Movie Hype
New Releases, Oscar-Winners and Obscure Movies!

Birth of a Nation (1915 movie)

2 Ratings: 2.0
Classics movie

A pivotal moment in film history. AfterThe Birth of a Nation, nothing was the same: not the way audiences watched movies, not the way filmmakers created them. D.W. Griffith's jumbo-size saga of the Civil War expanded the boundaries of storytelling … see full wiki

Genre: Classics
1 review about Birth of a Nation (1915 movie)

Incredible and awful all at the same time

  • Aug 27, 2010
Rating:
+3
To watch this movie is to watch a contradiction.

There is no question that in terms of a movie, it is incredible, even more so when you consider that it is 95 years old. The Battle scenes are spectacular, The acting is pretty good considering the lack of sound. The occasional comedy is ok and in an age of everything digital the sight of a large scene full of real people and the desire to control it is appealing.

We clearly see this story is being told from the view of the old south that still existed in living memory at the time. Lincoln is treated with some deference (we will ask the great heart) but to say this film is practically pining for the old Confederacy is the understatement of the year.

You get some impressions of the racial attitudes in the first third of the picture when we get glimpses of the old south but it's the reconstruction scenes that are so unbelievable vile and twisted in its view that one is unsure if you are watching Triumph of the Will (Remastered) .

What is even worse in purely cinematic terms the 2nd half is an exciting movie so it reinforces a message that is so racist that it was controversial even in 1915 and led to the resurgence of the KKK and all the blood that would follow.

It can't be denied that ignoring the subject matter, what Griffith does on screen was genius. A breakthrough for its day and age, a masterpiece of cinematic achievement that is the ancestor of the great movies of today. That as a movie it can stand up to a modern film in terms of quality speaks to that.

It also can't be denied that the message it conveys is dehumanizing to an entire race of people, simply evil and wrong. While it argues the futility of war it presents a case to justify the permanent subjugation of millions based upon race. The closing image of Christ as if an endorsement of this blasphemy managed to add one more outrage to an already outrageous message. In this sense it is a greater ancestor to Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 as a propaganda organ (that thankfully can't match the quality).

To truly understand an era one should read the newspapers and history books of the time, and also to watch the films. This film gives an important glimpse to its time, like the Islamic beheading videos one wants to turn away, but denial of reality will not make it go away. This film needs to be seen and forthrightly confronted for what it is.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
9
Thought-Provoking
9
Fun to Read
9
Well-Organized
9
Post a Comment
September 24, 2010
The sequel wasn't directed by Griffith, it was called Fall of a Nation (released in 1916) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_of_a_Nation I haven't seen it, and I'm sure it pales in comparison...
 
September 24, 2010
It's also the first film to get the distinction of having a sequel.
September 24, 2010
Would Intolerance properly be considered a sequel? I've never seen it.
 
1
What's your opinion on Birth of a Nation (1915 movie)?
rate
2 Ratings: +2.0
You have exceeded the maximum length.
Photos
Birth of a Nation (1915) (1915)
Related Topics
Cinderfella

A movie directed by Frank Tashlin

First to Review
Source: Birth of a Nation (1915 movie) on Lunch.com
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Hype is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists