Movie Hype
New Releases, Oscar-Winners and Obscure Movies!

A Nightmare On Elm Street 2010: Do the nightmares remain?

  • May 3, 2010
  • by
Rating:
+3


In 1984 Wes Craven introduced us to a little character named Freddy Kruger, a true boogeyman.  This film introduced us to a new type of slasher featuring one of the scariest villians ever created, pretty much jump started Johnny Depp's acting career and spawned 8 sequels.  This is one of the best horror movies ever made and when I heard that a re-make was being made I was really disappointed as I feared it would suffer the fate of well...all horror remakes and end up being a very shallow blood fest.  So after seeing this just this morning i feel a little torn about it, so I'll take this step by step

Synopsis:  Nightmares have been plaguing the teens of Springwood about a burned man with a knives for fingers (Yes, I'm aware it's a glove bear with me),  When one of their friends Dean kills himself in the middle of a dinner after one such nightmare they find themselves digging up pieces of their own past while trying to survive the horrible Freddy Kruger.

Story:
Although this is in fact a remake of of the first movie and the basis of the story remains the same, alot more things have changed than stayed true.  For instance, several of the characters were replaced in order to appease this generation a little bit more.  One thing that is in fact interesting is we're introduced more to Freddy's backstory, which was a little cliche but in a slasher, no surprise.  There was one BIG difference and that was *SPOILER ALERT* Freddy was not a child murderer in this version he was a child molester. 
One of the worst aspects of this movie were the killings, as in the original they were creative and unique while in this one they seemed a little dry and predictable, so much so that I predicted one of them maybe 10 minutes before it happened.  There were however several referances to the original that were done very creatively 
The twists given were actually pretty well addressed and plot holes were very seldom seen.  Scary wise...not so much in fact I would call this as more of a dark mystery if anything, nothing was truely scary however you will jump once or twice.  STORY OVERALL: 6.5/10

Cast:
Okay, I have to say this, Jackie Earle Hailey was an amazing Freddy Kruger.  Although he's only on screen for about 20 minutes he was definately the star of the entire movie with cruel jokes, an incredibly dark attitude and his normal total diregard for human life.  This Freddy though is much different than the Robert Englund version, he seems to be more interested in actual revenge and inflicting pain than making cheesy jokes; a fine change in my opinion.

That being said the rest of the cast was very forgettable Dean, and Kat (played by Kallan Lutz and Katie Cassidy) were almost text book movie teenagers and paper thin, as well as their acting.  The character jesse (Thomas Dekker) was, for lack of better word, okay with what he had to work with.
 
And of course to fans there's Nancy (Rooney Mara), she was much different and almost unemotional throughout the entire movie.  When it came to about the second half it was like someone turned on her acting switch and she was much better; sadly though that's really all I can say about Nancy she may have been important but she was very boring.

Taking place of johnny depp's character we have a new guy named Quentin (Kyle Gallner) we have an legitamately fine actor.  he gave his all when playing a paranoid insomniac and looked actually scared when it came to Freddy, sadly the only other good actor in this movie aside from Jackie Earle Hailey and Rooney Mara in the second half
CAST OVERALL: 5/10, 8/10 for Jackie specifically

Special Effects/Cinemetography:
Freddy himself looked fairly interesting as he looked like he was really burned rather than a rubber mask.  The only downside to this was that there was sometimes a lack of emotion in facial features but with Freddy, honestly, who cares?  The SE, were used well to give a chilling experience in the dream world and some of the deaths looked a little more realistic,  At the same time they had what I call the "Micheal Bay Syndrome" AKA special effects for the use to simply look cool, such as snowing inside a house etc.

The locations used gave a dreery and depressing experience, giving a sort of hopeless feeling throughout the movie.  That being said the final location was very cheesy, I won't say what it is to spare more spoilers, as it was a generic horror location.  The Boiler Room the teens all eventually visit gave a chilling look, and had a spiders in your veins feeling, especially when Freddy drags his claws across the pipes.
Special Effects/Cinemetography overall: 7.5/10

Script:
I'll make this short and sweet, very cheesy lines, some of which make you roll your eyes.  Freddy had some decent line but still, at the same time the original did, I mean it's a slasher for god sakes
Script overall: 4/10

Scare Factor:
This movie seems to think that no one has ever seen a horror movie before and sticks to the basics.  Such as, See killer, scene pans away, killer is gone, hero thinks thery're safe, and Ahh! killer's right behind you.  Some of the popping up effects can cause some jump factor but it really just relys, again on basics.  Killers saying let's play some games, creepy singing, scary little girlsm and such
Scary? Not quite but it's playful

Final Review:   To say A Nightmare on Elm Street is a bad movie really goes too far, the story may have changed but it sticks to the traditional scares.  The good lies in Freddy himself and the nestagia of seeing a new 80's remake.  The bad lies in most of the cheesy dialogue and scares mixed with some really terrible acting from some of the actors.  But I digress, it's indeed a fun movie and good in far as horror movies.  Is it a gem though?  Sorry fans, far from it but you won't be too disappointed.

OVERALL REVIEW: 7/10

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
9
Thought-Provoking
9
Fun to Read
9
Well-Organized
9
Post a Comment
June 11, 2010
I'm VERY anti-remake unless you can bring something new and original to it and it doesn't sound like this one really has much to offer in that respect. I saw the previews in the theater and it looked very familiar. Everything looked like warmed-up Wes Craven--only when Craven did it, it hadn't been done before. Nice job evaluating the movie though.
June 12, 2010
Usually I am as well, especially when Americans remake Japanese films it's almost insulting. This one however, did a pretty good remake it was just still cheesy, which is like the original but they brought up alot of unique ideas in the remake. Plus believe it or not it taught me about insomnia and sleep disorders, they really knew that kind of stuff
June 12, 2010
I'll catch when it when it plays on cable for free I suppose. But usually when I see so many scenes from the original being reprised in the trailer it's not a good sign.
 
May 03, 2010
Nice breakdown. I saw this movie also and I had mixed feelings about it. I liked the new "Freddy" but the Nancy character was kinda weak. Nice work and thank you for sharing!!
 
May 03, 2010
See?  Writing your first review wasn't so bad, was it?  Very nice.  I may see this... eventually, but I'm not making any promises up front.  Hope to see more from you in the future.
 
1
More A Nightmare on Elm Street (201... reviews
review by . March 23, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
* out of ****     The remake of "A Nightmare on Elm Street" is a mad failure of a horror film; a horror movie trying to seduce us through visuals that aren't even the creation of the director or the writer (or even the visual effects designer), as well as that ever-so generic feeling of horror. Yes, I know that this remake isn't the first, of many, to suck. But since "A Nightmare on Elm Street" was originally a good movie, with all its surrealism and intelligent ideas, I would …
review by . May 01, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Whenever I Want To, All I Have To Do is...Drreeaaamm...Dream...Dream....Dream....
   ...of a world with NO Remakes. Hurm....Hurm...      The original “Nightmare on Elm Street” was a film experienced that broadened the scope of “Slasher” films. Wes Craven managed to bring an imaginative twist to the 80’s slasher fare that “Friday the 13th” or “Halloween” could not match; “Nightmare” brought forth a deformed, burned entity that preys on his victims when they are most vulnerable--while …
review by . November 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
FEELS LIKE A MURDER MYSTERY MORE SO THAN HORROR
      A NIGHTMARE ON ELM ST.      Remakes are a crazy thing because no matter what people will have certain expectations for it, even if they don't mean to. In this day and age remakes are becoming the norm while originality is becoming a thing of the past, kinda. Don't get me wrong I like remakes for the most part because I believe that they help to showcase something that once was off to a new generation. But the end results are mostly negative with …
review by . June 24, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Please Tell Me It's Only A Dream
I'll admit that Wes Craven's ANOES was perhaps one of the most influential, if not innovative scripts of the eighties. In light of that, it's almost impossible to believe that any sequels or needless remakes could ever recapture that charm in it's entirety. Nevertheless, I've seen virtually every sequel ever made & even had a razor glove as a kid which I bought from Toy R Us. Naturally, it would only make sense that I'd manage to find a way of seeing the remake in opening …
review by . June 11, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
I'm honestly not sure why they bothered to make this movie.      It's not that this new take of Wes Craven's classic Nightmare on Elm Street is bad. It's well-made, polished and dark and gleaming, and has some truly memorable scenes. There's a scene in a supermarket, flickering in and out of dreams, that I found particularly effective and well-done.      But here's the thing - it's not very engaging, it's not very funny, and …
review by . March 25, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
If asked to describe the man of your dreams, what would you say?  Would you call him "dreamy" or any other cliche term? Although this particular man has been known by many since the '80s to be associated with dreams, I bet only a few if any would think of him in this context.  In fact, Freddy would probably be the last person you'd name, however after this weekend he will be the one man in everyone's dreams.      From the opening scene and straight …
review by . October 14, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
While there's really no reason to remake Wes Craven's cult original, I wondered what 20 years and a pile of mediocre sequels would breathe into the franchise and, of course, who would play Freddy. Following in the footsteps of Robert Englund is no small feat but Jackie Earle Haley (of Watchmen fame) was a great casting decision, and carries out the sadomasochistic teen-slashing quite convincingly. He does this despite the script so kudos for making something out of nothing.      …
review by . December 03, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
There's no doubt that if you're looking for a film to give you some jolts, you won't do wrong renting this piece. On the other hand, if you're more selective, there are other adventures that are more worthwhile. I've never actually seen the 1984 classic, which gives me all the advantages and disadvantages that come with seeing only the remake. This dream sequence slasher film is done effectively enough by Jackie Earle Haley in the title role, but the mayhem gets tiresome with …
review by . August 07, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
A midget Freddy and
Nightmare on Elm Street reboot was terrible.  I didn't care for the cheap scares, the bad acting, the terrible writing and the plain Jane actresses.  When the women wear less make-up than the guys, somethings wrong.  I wished the made a sequel to the series a la Predators instead of this ill advised remake for the "Twilight" crowd.  The use of twenty something teenagers is starting to bother me.  The new Freddy was real laughable and not scary at all.  …
review by . May 20, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
A Nightmare on elm street? more like A Nightmare of filmmaking......
I am not a fan of the original  "A Nightmare on Elm Street" in fact I did not like it much at all  mostly due to the fact that for a movie with it's reputation it lacked everything a great horror film  needs it just fell flat when I needed it to soar. Sometime in mid to late '09, I started hearing rumors that New Line Cinema was looking to reboot the famed Nightmare on Elm Street franchise but then I had not seen the original so I had no interest in watching the …
About the reviewer
Ian ()
My name is Ian, and interesting would not really be a word to describe me. I'm an aspiring writer with a huge passion for movies and video games, some of which consume much of my time. Sadly that's … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Ianmat
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

Michael Bay (Transformers,Pearl Harbor) produced this remake of Wes Craven's 1985 horror classicA Nightmare on Elm Street, which means updated shocks, computer-driven special effects, and a brand-new Freddy Krueger, this time played by Oscar nominee Jackie Earle Haley. Unfortunately, it also means a mechanical, largely scare-free carbon of the original film--the same fate suffered by Bay's remakes ofThe Texas Chainsaw MassacreandFriday the 13th. Director Samuel Bayer, best known for helming videos for Nirvana and Green Day, does well by the film's visuals, which hew toward stylized doominess, but the film itself limps from set piece to set piece, with the ones borrowed directly from Craven's original scoring the most impact. What's left are a group of dull teens on the run from Haley's Freddy, who proves unsettling, if not the dynamo that Robert Englund was in the previous franchise entries. Speaking of which, the picture ends on a note that suggests a follow-up is imminent, though some more inspiration is clearly needed if Bay'sNightmareintends to have the longevity of the first series.--Paul Gaita

"


Nightmare on Elm Street
 is a reboot of the popular Freddy Krueger franchise from the eighties and nineties.  Jackie Earle Haley (Watchmen) will take on the razor glove as the new Freddy.  It is scheduled for release on April 30th 2010.

A Nightmare on Elm Street is a 2010 American slasher film directed by Samuel Bayer, ...
view wiki

Details

Director: Samuel Bayer
Genre: Horror
Release Date: April 10th 2010
MPAA Rating: R
Screen Writer: Wes Craven
DVD Release Date: October 5, 2010
Runtime: 95 minutes
Studio: Platinum Dunes, New Line Cinema
First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Hype is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists