There have been many things said about George Romero and even more things said about his Dead films post the original three. For the most part people liked "Land" and just excepted it for what it was; people seem divided on "Diary" and as for this one well people kinda disliked it. Now I will say from jump right now that I have enjoyed all of them, honestly I have. I really liked all of them and that includes this one, do I like some more than others, of course. Where would this one rank, well I am sure most people could guess.
This film is based on a solider you may have seen in the previous two "Dead" films, he is labeled something different in each but in the special features Romero says he is the same character. The film follows him and his group of comrades as they make their way to an Island off of the coast of Delaware. This island is home to two different families who hate each other; you know the classic blood feud story. The O'Flynn's want all zombies terminated while the Muldoon's are trying to round them up and save them for the day a cure is found. Seems like something is wrong on both sides but I [if this really happened] may be on the side called TEAM PEOPLE were we kill the zombies threat. Say what you want but they tried to kill Simon Pegg, and poor Nick frost was turned into one, that is unforgivable.
When the military click happen upon a video thanks to a kid that tags along in which a man claims to have boats to get to an island off the shore line in Delaware, they make their way to it. After a very entertaining stand off with not only the man and his men at the boat place but with the dead as well they finally make it onto one and head over there. It is here that the real zombie killing begins and the fun begins as well, the blood feud is still very going on. O'Flynn came along for the ride to make it back home finally after being banished by Muldoon and is looking for his daughter and revenge.
The film is really just that but with a lot of gore and death so it is still fun, especially for fans of this type of film. The film is not perfect and the flaws are there, this is not the best of the "Dead" films but with no expectations it is still kinda fun. I think it is a fun twist on an old story, kinda like the "Pride & Prejudice & Zombies" style books. The acting is good at least for the most part and every one seemed like they were having fun on this. O'Flynn was my favorite for some reason; he was just funny to me and his character was great.
Speaking of that all of the acting seemed good, the characters and even the performances some times seemed 2-d but for the most part I kinda thought it was over the top good. Romero always has strong scripts and his direction is always great here I think he said "I am just going to have fun with this one". The reason I say that is because it feels a little more loose than his other works. Still I found it to be a good enough movie that does not match the earlier films but is still worth my dollar.
This two disc version is excellent with loads of features, everything from featurettes to full length making of. Of course the always great commentary is a highlight on any film geeks list so you know I loved it. There are little shorts on here as well and many more things zombie fans will enjoy. To be honest getting the 2-disc version is really worth the money even if you didn't care for the film as much as his others. I say go ahead and buy this 2-disc version if you already haven't, it would be worth it.
Let’s be honest here; George Romero is certain to have a spot in the “Horror Hall of Fame” since he has indeed given us the best in “undead” entertainment. His fans have always seen that the man can do no wrong, but honestly, his “dead” series has been really inconsistent and some may even say that it is indeed a ‘dead series’. After my disappointments with “Diary of the Dead”, I wonder what in heaven’s name am I doing … more
*1/2 out of **** Isn't it strange how one day, a man is an inspirational director who re-invents a genre, and then the next day he's a generic, forgettable bloke? George A. Romero, King of the Zombies, is without a doubt one of those men. The man has made good to great films before; take the original "Dawn of the Dead" for example. But his zombie career, particularly in the "Dead" series, has gotten worse and worse as time goes on. His zombies … more
Forewarned is fore-armed and perhaps that's the best way to view George Romero's latest zombie flick SURVIVAL OF THE DEAD. One always hopes for another classic of the same stature as NIGHT, DAWN, or even DAY OF THE LIVING DEAD but audiences should cut the guy a little slack and realize that no one can give them what they want every time out of the starting gate. I went into this flick expecting something that was absolutely unwatchable, and what I got was a film that (had … more
Diary of the Dead was Romero's attempt to cash in on the shaky cam craze while putting his own zombie mastermind spin on it. Although technically his fifth film in the living dead series, I never really considered it on the same field as Night, Dawn, Day and Land. It seemed more like a spin off film, an add on, to make a gaming analogy Diary of the Dead was a bonus pack, not a new game in and of itself. For me, and for many, many other long time Romero fans, Diary was a bitter disappointment. It … more
With George A. Romero, it's always about social critique. "Night of the Living Dead," released at the closing of the 1960s, examined the horrors of war - specifically the Cold War and Vietnam - and the harsh reality of racism. "Dawn of the Dead" satirized American consumerism. "Day of the Dead" suggested that man's greatest enemy isn't a world full of zombies, but his fellow man. "Land of the Dead" explored political divisions between classes in a post-apocalyptic community. "Diary of the Dead," … more
Survival of the Dead follows the exploits of Sarge Crockett, a National Guardsman who was for a brief moment an internet celebrity when he was captured on video robbing the film students from Diary of the Dead and a feud between two clans on a small Atlantic island community. Sarge and his soldiers are now in survival mode and they're looking for a place to hide out from the zombie plague. One of the island's clam leaders has been exiled from his home along with his followers … more
Survival of the Dead: It was ok. The cultural commentary seemed forced. But, movie seemed more like a comedy than a horror movie. There is a reason by Return of the Living Dead is not considered to be up to par to the Dead series. This compares to the recent D zombie movies that have been coming out.
I basically am just a normal person obbsessed with Mixed Martial Arts, pro wrestling, movies of all kinds, music of all kinds, books of all kinds, and of course foods of all kinds. Just trying to keep … more
Consider the Source
Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.
Writer-director George A. Romero, who invented the modern zombie film with 1968's Night of the Living Dead, returns to the graveyard for Survival of the Dead, the fifth sequel (of sorts) to his landmark movie, with his trademark gore and social commentary intact. Survival picks up shortly after the events of 2008's Diary of the Dead, which offered a revisionist take on the zombie outbreak in Night; here, a minor character from Diary (Alan Van Sprang) takes center stage with his team of fellow mercenary soldiers as they make their way to remote Plum Island, where two feuding Irish families sort out the best way to deal with the living dead. As is often the case with Romero's films, the ideas don't always match the execution--his dialogue and characters remain painfully stock at times, and the CGI elements of the effects look amateurish--but at its core, the picture retains his fascination for entropy in American society, as personified by the twin family patriarchs, who cling stubbornly to their beliefs as their world literally dies around them. Parallels between this story and the conservative movement of the early 21st century are obvious, and while others have made more artful statements about the situation, Romero once again cuts to the bloody heart of the matter. Limited in scope and budget, Survival isn't on par with Night or 1978's Dawn of the Dead, but it's a watchable and intriguing addition to his zombie ...