Movie Hype
New Releases, Oscar-Winners and Obscure Movies!

A Little Uneven but Far From Being Rusted

  • May 9, 2010
Rating:
+4
Superhero movies have a strange formula to them that, for the most part, has served it well for the past decade.  The first movie spends quite a bit of time on the origin of the hero and thus it's usually not quite as interesting as the first sequel.  Once we get to the first sequel we've passed the "how" someone became a hero and usually the "why," so the bigger focus is usually on a nemesis to the hero and perhaps digging a little deeper into the hero's own story, feelings and motivations.  Iron Man 2 follows this same formula with ease.  In the past, most times the second film has usually been better than the first.  This actually isn't true of Iron Man 2.  It's good and fun (mostly) but it never achieves the incredible charm of the first film. 



Since the first movie ended, there has been world peace for the time being.  The United States millitary, however, is wondering if this will last.  And how long.  Other nations have been trying to make another type of suit similar to the one that Tony Stark himself has made.  As a result of this, the US Military wants the technology that Tony Stark used to make these weapons.  Stark refuses, claiming that the other nations must be at least a decade behind.  With the exception of Justin Hammer, a bumbling business man also trying to make and design weapons... he's the exception because, according to Stark, he must be at least twenty years behind. 

The answer suffices until someone in Russia, a man named Ivan Vanko (played very well by Mickey Rourke) actually does create something using similar technology and attacks Tony Stark.  With that in mind, the US is pressuring Tony more to give up his technology, while Justin Hammer works behind the scenes to utilize Ivan's resourcefulness to make a better weapon than what Tony Stark has created.  There's more to the story than this, including secrets from Tony Stark's past, as well as having to cope with the possibility that he might die. 

If anything, Iron Man 2 gets points for being able to juggle all that it has going on.  It tries to be more complex and bigger than the original, but that may be part of what the problem with Iron Man 2's narrative is.  Not that it throws too much in, but mostly that it tries too hard to be better than the first one.  There are some interesting characters introduced (the most amusing of which is Nastasha Romanoff, played by Scarlett Johansson).  Mickey Rourke does a fantastic job as Ivan, but Sam Rockwell as Justin Hammer is more likely to annoy you than anything.  You can only spend so much time rooting for him to falter.  Not because he's one of the "bad" guys, but because his character is not in the slightest bit charming.  If he was supposed to be an unlikable character, then the crew behind Iron Man 2 succeeded.  Better than they know.

The interesting change to the cast, however, is Don Cheadle playing James Rhodes.  He replaces Terrance Howard, but I wonder just how well the boys behind the scenes were thinking when they did this little number.  Don Cheadle doesn't do a bad job, but Terrance Howard is definitely better.  The rumor is that Terrance Howard asked for more money.  And while they may not have signed him up... they might've done well to at least get someone that actually resembles Terrance Howard in some way.  It might not bother anyone else in the long run, though.  And Don Cheadle does do an incredible job.

If anything, the story of Iron Man 2 is good, but it's also pretty slow.  Save for a couple of action sequences, the story doesn't really have a whole lot of action until the last half hour or so.  It's actually amazing just how little Stark actually puts on the suit.  For the most part, the movie spends a lot more time on Stark's melodrama, stacking in quite a bit for the audience to swallow.  It does a good job of juggling it, but there are moments when you're wondering if Stark is ever going to start kicking butt and taking names.  The end result is a movie that actually feels unbalanced.  If the first hour and a half of the movie lacks too much action, the last half hour is so full of it that it lacks the substance of the beginning and middle.  Jon Favreau begins to drown everything out in so many weird, pointless explosions while throwing in several action sequences that, while fun at first, can actually feel like overkill.  It just doesn't do nearly as good a job as the first film in balancing its story and its action.  That by no means makes Iron Man 2 bad.  It just means that depending on who you are... you'll probably find the first one is more fun because it did a much better job of balancing it all.  Tony Stark is also not nearly as clever and witty, but Robert Downey Jr. is still incredible within his role.  The movie is filled with humorous moments, though some of them just feels very strange and awkward.

The special effects are nice overall.  Although Marvel still seems to have a fetish with ragdoll effects.  It's not nearly as noticeable in the Iron Man movies as much as it is in say... Spider-Man, but when you do notice it, it can feel less like you're watching a movie and more like you're watching some kid play with toys.  Nevertheless, Iron Man 2 is still a fun movies.  It has some heart, laughter and explosions. 

For those looking to a great start for the summer, Iron Man 2 will definitely do it.  The movie isn't as good as the first Iron Man movie, but it's not bad in the slightest.  It doesn't live up to all the hype that was expected of it, but that probably comes from the film getting far too much hype.  Meaning, it's a good movie, if you've tempered your expectations from the bombardment of ads and promotional stuff surrounding it.  Do that, and you're apt to leave Iron Man 2 a happy movie-goer.  Refuse and the only reason I can think of that someone would actually hate this movie would be if they let their expectations get absurdly high.  Go see it, and hopefully you'll find it in you to like it too.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
24
Thought-Provoking
24
Fun to Read
24
Well-Organized
24
Post a Comment
May 10, 2010
Great review. I like that the movie had enough going on and handled everything well. People say that the movie has too much going on, but the thing about that is Iron Man 2 HANDLES everything well and you can follow it. It's not a plot less movie, a movie with an incomprehensible plot or a movie with so much going on you can't follow it. Yeah, it could have used more action but the action it DID have was fantastic.
May 10, 2010
Yeah, Iron Man 2 has a lot going on, but it juggles it well, which is something I like.  But it also doesn't throw so much at you at once.  So it was easy to take it all in.  Especially because other situations involved different characters as well.  Not hard to follow at all.  I can't imagine anyone would even get lost in it.
 
May 09, 2010
Great review, Sean! Great touch in including that little bit about Terrance Howard--they should've learned from Michael Keaton, you cannot ask for more money when the chaarcter you are portraying wears a mask. This was alright but definitely expectations need to be tempered.
 
May 09, 2010
I expect a fun superhero movie with a snarky Stark and one-liners that would do Stan Lee proud. I understand there is stuff after the credits? Good review! I'll see this next week.
 
1
More Iron Man 2 reviews
review by . February 11, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
*** out of ****     The sequel to Jon Favreau's near-perfect "Iron Man" turns out to be pretty darn good, mostly thanks to the directorial talents of Mr. Favreau himself. Since it's nigh impossible to make a sequel to "Iron Man" and make it nearly as impressive and refreshing as the original film, Favreau decides to use what he's got. And he presents "Iron Man 2", in all its star-studded, CGI-happy glory, in the most passionate way possible. If you've heard that "Iron Man 2" …
review by . May 07, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
3 ½ + Stars: Shellhead Gets a
   …well, not exactly, although “Iron Man 2” is definitely your Hollywood fare that relies on being loud, “spiffy”, brisk popcorn entertainment but it does do it well; its uninspired plot mechanics render this sequel a step backward. The first film (personally that was NOT the Tony Stark I remember) while not perfect had better plot development and didn’t rely on being “spiffy” too much but focused more on characterization. …
review by . May 07, 2010
Would
Forgive the parlance, but I can't think of a better name for an irresponsible man who gets loaded, straps on a suit of destructive armor and starts using his laser beams to trick shoot fruit and vases in a crowded room full of people.  Tony may have seen the error of his ways in the first movie but with those troubles behind him theres plenty of room for his fast lifestyle and inner jerk to come out in this one.      Iron Man 2 is THE most anticipated Summer movie of …
review by . May 15, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Iron Man 2 takes off at a thounsand miles per hour and doesn't slow down.....
When "Iron Man" was released  in the early summer of 2008 it took the box-office and critics for a ride they would soon never forget, its huge critical and commercial success  and Robert Downey Jr.'s natural charm and appeal as the hero Tony Stark  landed this  larger than life comic book adaptation amongst the ranks  of greats such as Tim Burton's "Batman" and "Batman Returns", Christopher Nolan's "Batman reboot "Batman …
review by . May 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Sequels have a tendency to be on the mixed reaction of results. In the case of Marvel films (Spider-Man, X-Men, Fantastic 4, Hulk), it's a hit or miss. Regardless, we still love those comic book heroes in their adaptations. As with all comic book adaptations, they all loosely follow the comics per panel.      Iron Man 2 continues the origin story of Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) as he continues to rise and protect the world from evil in his armor powered suit. Now that he has …
review by . March 31, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
The United States government is now demanding of Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) that he hand over his advanced armor technology to the military. Stark publically refuses in a fashion that gets him a lot of negative attention. Though one day Stark is attacked by a man named Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke) who has technology of his own that might be on its way to being able to defeat Stark. Vanko now possibly has the technology to make a suit even stronger, and more advanced than Stark's. Meanwhile, …
review by . August 15, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Plenty of action. Plenty of drama, partying, flirting. But it lacked the heart of the first film (pardon the pun) and felt more choppy and predictable. There was one very satisfying relational moment, but other than that, I felt pretty indifferent and glad I didn’t hand over the moulah to see it in the theater. I’d suggest trying before buying.     
review by . May 07, 2010
If the turnout tonight is any indication of how popular Iron Man is this movie is in no danger of flopping. Iron Man was a comic book I picked up to try to get into something long ago as a kid. I wasn't completely familiar with the whole story, but that's what these movies are really designed to do. Initiate the public into the fantastic and interesting worlds of the comic books.      Most everyone already knows what this movie will entail from the previews. Mickey Rourke? Check. …
review by . May 13, 2010
Not as bad as you think.
      Your right its not as good as the first, but it aint that bad.          I think most people didnt like Ironman 2 beacause this movie although called Ironman focused mainly on Tony Stark. The stress from the US Government, the stress of being Ironman and running Stark Industries, and lets not forget The Arc reactor in his chest is killing him. But even through all this we still got a bunch of action and lots of laughs. Ironman 2 was a great …
review by . September 25, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
   Over the past decade we’ve seen some pretty phenomenal superhero stories. We’ve seen Christopher Nolan’s dramatic reinvention of the fledgling Batman series, Sam Raimi’s awakening of Spiderman, and Brett Ratner’s tale of the X-Men, among many many others. 2 years ago Jon Favreau entered that race with a little superhero film called Iron Man that was financed for $100 million dollars that won over both critics and audiences, and simply wasn’t afraid …
About the reviewer
Sean A. Rhodes ()
Ranked #8
I'm a more analytical person. I believe that the purpose of the review is not for me to give you my opinion but for me to give you an analysis and help you decide if you want to get it. If you reading … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Sean_Rhodes
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki



Iron Man 2 is a 2010 American superhero film based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name from Marvel Studios and Paramount Pictures. It is the sequel to 2008's Iron Man, and the second film in a planned trilogy.  Directed by Jon Favreau, the film stars Robert Downey Jr., reprising his role as Tony Stark.

Tony Stark has revealed his identity as Iron Man and is resisting calls by the United States Government to hand over the technology. Ivan Vanko has also duplicated the technology and built weapons of his own, creating new challenges for Stark.

The film held its red carpet premiere in Los Angeles, California, on April 26, 2010 and in France on April 28, 2010. It was released in the United States on May 7, 2010.





After the high-flying adventures of the firstIron Manpicture, the billionaire arms manufacturer and irrepressible bon vivant Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) finds himself nursing a hangover. But not like any hangover he's had before: this one is toxic, a potentially deadly condition resulting from heavy metals (or something) bleeding out of the hardware he's installed in the middle of his chest. This is the problem Stark needs to solve inIron Man 2, not to mention the threat from resentful Russian science whiz Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke), whose father helped create the Iron Man technology. There's an even bigger problem for the film: the need to set up a future Marvel Comics movie universe in which a variety of veteran ...
view wiki

Details

Director: Jon Favreau
Genre: Action, Adventure
Release Date: May 7th, 2010
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Studio: Marvel Studios, Paramount Pictures
Polls with this movie
30 Days of Night (2007 movie)

Best Comic Book/Manga To Film Adaptations

by

First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Hype is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists