If anyone can do grandeur, it's Peter Jackson. I mean, it's the mastermind behind the LOTR films. He is the one that can make a true monster epic for our time, and King Kong is definitely that. Great effects, great acting, great story, just general greatness. Some say that it was too long, I say that you need that much time to tell the story. Some say Adrien Brody isn't hero material. I say that he did just fine.
The effects are simply wonderful, but you aren't there to admire the effects, the effects are there to tell the story. It's good that 3-D wasn't around then, so this could remain it's wonderful self without 3-D tainting it. Kong himself looked really realistic and all the creatures on skull island looked incredibly realistic as well. It actually looked like they were real and that the deaths of certain characters looked real.
The acting was pretty good too, especially in its three leads. Naomi Watts, Adrien Brody, and surprisingly Jack Black did quite well. Not that I don't like Jack Black, I would just assume that he wouldn't do well in a slightly more serious role like this. It's a definite welcome change from his normal roles, and I like it. Adrien and Naomi are both great actors unto themselves and had good chemistry and were a believable couple. As for the rest of the crew, I thought they were actually pretty good, especially Jimmy, and the mystery-shrouded Captain Hayes. They are also all good actors and they made for a great supporting cast for a great movie.
The story was really well done, and the "romance" (if that's what you can call it) between Ann and Kong as well as Ann and Jack really incorporates well into the story without overshadowing it or taking it over. The heart of the story is still the monster-epic, and it should definitely stay that way. Some people think that they spent too long on the boat. I disagree, but I can see where they're coming from. They're playing the rule of Jaws, where you wait an hour to show the monster, and I can definitely see how that could leave certain people impatient and waiting to see Kong, but you have to let the story roll in order to show the monster. That, unfortunately, involves spending some more time on the boat.
This is another case of CGI done right. This is a case of everything done right. Not to say that it's a perfect movie, but it's pretty damn close. If Peter Jackson didn't have delusions of grandeur, then some of the greatest fantasy films ever wouldn't exist, and that would be quite a shame.
If you haven't seen this movie, it's definitely worth a rental. Far from perfect, but far from horrible. I haven't seen the original, but after seeing this, i really want to. All in all, an unforgettable movie, one of my favourites of all time.
**** out of **** After finishing his breathe-taking "Lord of the Rings" film trilogy, Peter Jackson realized that he still had the rest of his entire career ahead of him; and he intended to use whatever time he had left. He has, since the "LOTR" films, made but two films; one of them great, one bad. And luckily for me and for you, we're talking about the better film; which is "King Kong". There's a name you may not; or at least, you should know it. It's the name that comes … more
Peter Jackson's remake of the 1933 King Kong is exactly how to do a remake. This movie keeps to the spirit of the original, whilst including state of the art special effects and exciting action scenes. Jackson didn't try to add any silly plot twists or change the setting to 2005, but rather set out to remake the original film as it stood. He deserves a lot of credit for resisting the urge to "improve" the basic plot structure and settings of the original King Kong. … more
KING KONG I remember watching the original Kong film back in the day and every one that followed and could not help but be entertained by every one although the first was the best. I have always enjoyed Kong films and have only rooted against him when he took on the greatest of all time in Godzilla. So after years of nothing new when this film was announced I was actually excited about it when normally I would be like "oh man they are going … more
Peter Jackson's remake of the 1933 King Kong is exactly how to do a remake. This movie keeps to the spirit of the original, whilst including state of the art special effects and exciting action scenes. Jackson didn't try to add any silly plot twists or change the setting to 2005, but rather set out to remake the original film as it stood. He deserves a lot of credit for resisting the urge to "improve" the basic plot structure and settings of the original King Kong. The only … more
Right after Lord of the Rings became such a smash success at the Box Office and the Academy Awards, Peter Jackson set out to do a film he just about always wanted to do: King Kong. Peter Jackson talked about how much he enjoyed the film. And for the most part, King Kong really sounded like a movie Jackson should do. It could've been a huge epic! Yeah! And Peter Jackson does make it an epic. But when making such an epic where exactly does the line get drawn? … more
Peter Jackson's King King is an excellent film. I was surprised by how well it was made. The direction, photography, acting and special effects were just fantastic. I usually have negative opinions of big budget remakes but this one is excellent. Even Jack Black is good in this film (I an not a fan of his other work) and I'm impressed how Peter Jackson managed to get a very good performance out of him, Naomi Watts redefines the role of Fay Wray and Adrien Brody … more
It's the height of the Depression in New York City, and down-on-her-luck actress Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) accepts movie director Carl Denham's (Jack Black) offer to sail off for an adventure and make a movie. Playwright/screenwriter Jack Driscoll (Adrien Brody) gets stuck on board and they all sail off for Skull Island, a mysterious place that just happens to be the home of bloodthirsty natives, prehistoric animals, and a 25-foot tall ape called Kong. When the natives kidnap Ann and sacrifice her … more
This movie was excellent. It borrows a lot from the original with incredible special effects and amazing recreations of 1931 New York! King Kong finally moves like a real gorilla and the destruction that gets wrecked throughout the movie is very convincing! The natives of this movie look like something out of the Exorcist although there was a tribute to the original natives during the scene where Kong is displayed to the New York public at the theater. There are a lot more … more
Pretty girl meets monster ape King Kong has got his charm In all the most romantic scenes The girl is on his arm Naomi's got the strongest arms She must be doing curls But Kong has got the safest paws For catching falling girls Packed to the brim with CGI This movie's much too long Stampeding dinos, "Tremors" worms Some parts just don't belong … more
4.5/5 Stars This remake of one of the most cherished films of all time wins an award for something, a minor one, but still an award and that is that it's probably the best remake of all time. Not much considering its competition, but still it's something. King Kong (2005) is certainly worth a look, but I must say some critical response to the running time of over three hours considering it could easily be two hours and still give the same level of emotion, but in the end … more
The extended version of Peter Jackson'sKing Kongadds 13 minutes to the running time--fortunately those 13 minutes include two dynamic action scenes and no material has been added to the movie's belabored set-up, which tries to give depth to these quintessentially b-movie characters with a clumsy patchwork of melodrama and in-jokes. But once movie-maker Carl Denham (Jack Black,School of Rock) and his crew finally arrive at Skull Island, the movie kicks into gear with spectacular action, technical wizardry, and genuine feeling. ThoughKongseems crafted to dazzle the eye on the giant screen, the overlong structure improves when you can take an intermission at will. At home, each scene can be approached on its own terms, be it the insanely choreographed battle between Kong and three T. Rexes or the subtle and multi-layered interplay between Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts,Mulholland Drive) and Kong (played, through motion-capture technology, by Andy Serkis, who previously played the similarly animated Gollum in Jackson'sLord of the Rings). The addition of a rampaging ceratops and an underwater race with what the movie's crew dubbed a "piranhadon" not only add more eye candy, but provide some valuable moments of character development. But in the end, that's frosting on the cake; when the movie's weaknesses and strengths are weighed, the emotional power of the fantastical relationship between a woman and a giant ape is a real cinematic achievement.--Bret ...