Movie Hype
New Releases, Oscar-Winners and Obscure Movies!

A 2011 movie directed by Bennett Miller.

< read all 9 reviews

Moneyball works

  • Oct 14, 2011
Is it more surprising that a movie was made of Moneyball, Michael Lewis's great account of how Billy Beane made the A's a winning baseball team by finding undervalued players, or that it took so long to do because of Hollywood's sausage-making machinery?  Perhaps what is most surprising is that the result is really, really good.

First, this isn't really a movie about baseball (yes, that's the second time I've used that phrase today--see my review of The Art of Fielding, the best-selling book by Chad Harbach)--but I have empirical (well, OK, only one data point, so its more anecdotal) proof in this case, because my son, a confirmed baseball hater but big Brad Pitt fan, says this is the best movie he's seen so far this year.  And some critics and baseball purists have said that both the book and the movie, but particularly the movie, overstate and oversimplify the value and uniqueness of Billy Beane's approach.  The point of this review is not to quibble about those fine points.  The point is this--every GM now users Moneyball techniques, and the movie and book are both valuable and entertaining introductions to the concept.

Brad Pitt perfectly captures Billy Beane as the  tortured and frustrated former can't-miss prospect as Lewis described him in the book.   Nervous tics, compulsive eating (Pitt seems especially adept at this; reference the Ocean's series!), refusal to watch the games, all make Beane a riveting character.  Jonah Hill plays the nerdy stat geek who crunches the numbers for Beane and finds him the undervalued players that fit the payroll.  Hill and Beane seem to develop a genuine relationship, to the point where by the end of the movie their banter seems so lose it could be unscripted. 

The traditionalist scouts play the bad guys attempting to thwart Beane's new approach, and they are such an easy mark that the movie doesn't quite ring true to life here, just enough to knock one point off my rating.  However, in defense of the movie, it is the case that the resistance to recognizing the value of new statistical analysis was very strong, and took years to overcome around baseball.  While the movie does stack the deck against them, the results are in, and Moneyball won, so the case can't be argued into the ground.  This is, after all, entertainment, not documentary film-making. 

And entertaining it is.  The movie moves at its own pace, not the driven or inevitable pace of most sports redemption movies.  It is much smarter than the usual type of the genre, and in fact does have somewhat of a documentary feel to it at times, but never strays from the story that it is determined to tell.  I would expect Moneyball to get nods for Best Picture, Brad Pitt for best actor, and Hill for best supporting actor, and all would be well deserved.  Moneyball isn't a loud drama driven by three-dimensional special effects, a star-packed comedy, or a blockbuster series.  Its just a good small film.  Go see it.

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
October 15, 2011
I liked this one as well; the script and the direction was real strong.
More Moneyball reviews
review by . September 25, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
The Men Behind The Oakland A's History-Making Season
Oakland A’s fans would be right at home with “Moneyball” as they would be very familiar with the amazing historic run of the team during the 2002 baseball season. Well, I am currently a “retired” baseball fan but even I remember that record-breaking season, when an underdog team actually went on to make history. Non-Athletics fans wouldn’t be lost either since while this is indeed a film about baseball and about the A’s, the film’s focus isn’t …
review by . January 21, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Baseball is a game of spitting, crotch scratching and often interminably long innings. Moneyball is a movie that deconstructs the myths of America’s home-style game and shows how it becomes an exemplar of big business. By the time Moneyball is over, baseball’s traditions are as quaint as long underwear, the players have become work units, and computer analysis is still unknown by the fans as they munch their expensive hot dogs, slosh beer on their neighbors and scream joyously for the …
review by . September 25, 2011
Billy Beane won, you know. He would hate to hear anyone say that since he never picked up a Pennant, but he won. He changed the way baseball is played. Well, maybe not so much played as constructed, but his method proved to win a ton of games in the end. Most teams are emulating his model now, and as the Boston Red Sox say at the end of the movie Moneyball, those not using it are old dinosaurs. Beane's biggest foe, Joe Morgan, is an old trudging dino these days whom I could probably beat up, and …
review by . September 23, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
There is a tendency in Hollywood for their movies to have a deeper meaning. If a movie were just about zombies it may be tough to get a broad audience into the theater. So what people tend to do is add a metaphor like zombies that really stand for consumerism or lack of individuality or some B.S. like that. Or they will put in a handsome lead to attract women who may otherwise not want to see a monster movie. Moneyball has every opportunity to do these things as well and while it may touch …
review by . December 19, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
   Moneyball was one of my most anticipated movies of this year. The simple combination between Miller, Sorkin, Pitt, Hoffman, and Pfister projected the prospect of a bomb movie. The clock was ticking faster and faster and as soon as I hit the comfortable seat in my theater I decided to let myself caught in this movie's bliss. Did I get caught in that web? Ehh... not really. Sadly, I was too hyped over this project that I left in a way disappointed even though I thought the movie was …
review by . September 23, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
A third base hit
MONEYBALL Written by Steve Zaillian and Aaron Sorkin Directed by Bennett Miller Starring Brad Pitt, Johan Hill and Philip Seymour Hoffman   Billy Beane: There are rich teams; there are poor teams; then there’s fifty feet of crap; and then there’s us.   These days, it seems that when it comes to conversations about the American economy, the focus is on the increasing divide between the rich and the poor. In MONEYBALL, that same gap is affecting America’s favourite …
review by . September 22, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
'Moneyball' 'Two Jews On Film' Only One Says This Hits A Home Run (Video)
   First thing I must say is...I basically know nothing about sports. I do watch the Super Bowl but only for the commercials. That said, I absolutely loved 'Money Ball'. Which goes to prove, that you don't have to be a baseball fan, to think that this film, written by Aaron Sorkin and Steve Zaillan and directed by Bennett Miller, is absolutely wonderful.      Brad Pitt portrays real life Baseball legend, Billy Beanne. I'm sure there are many people …
About the reviewer
Todd Stockslager ()
Ranked #65
I love reading and writing about what I have read, making the connections and marking the comparisons and contrasts. God has given man the amazing power to invent language and the means to record it which … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game (ISBN 0-393-05765-8) is a book by Michael Lewis, published in 2003, about the Oakland Athletics baseball team and its general manager Billy Beane. Its focus is the team's analytical, evidence-based, sabermetric approach to assembling a competitive baseball team, despite Oakland's disadvantaged revenue situation. A film based on the book starring Brad Pitt was released in 2011.
view wiki
© 2015, LLC All Rights Reserved - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Hype is part of the Network - Get this on your site
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since