Movie Hype
New Releases, Oscar-Winners and Obscure Movies!
Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows

A movie directed by Guy Ritchie

< read all 9 reviews

"Why don't the two of you just f**k already and get it out of your system?!"

  • Dec 17, 2011
Rating:
+2
I didn't pick up on it in the first one, but after someone brought it to my attention and repeat viewings....oh yeah, Holmes and Watson are pretty gay for each other in the first film and in this one.....oh yeah it's the whole point why Irene Adler was even in the first movie and why Watson is getting married here, to throw you off.

I really hated making the gay joke above but this running thread in this movie, especially during the train rescue scene is a real distraction.  From that scene to even the part where Watson says that (Holmes) taught him how to dance....it's all I thought of in some scenes.  No it isn't BAD, but like I said, it's a distraction.                     

The distraction comes as a good sign as this movie, almost literally is like the Bond movie Tommorrow Never Dies.  You might remember that one, where Bond stops a media king from manipulating countries into a war so that he get high ratings and magazine sales?  Well this movie is about Sherlock coming face to face with Professor Moriarty to learn that Moriarty is manipulating countries with bomb attacks (France and Germany mainly) and positioned himself to be a head of major gun and supply companies.  When World War One comes out due to this, he stands to make a fortune.......nah, it's just me.  Theres no similarities.

Theres more going on with Watson getting Married and trying to distance himself from Holmes, but Moriarty says anything is fair game and a double mission involves running off with Watson to stop Moriarty and getting the new wife out of the way and in the care of Sherlock's pompus brother Microft.  That leaves Holmes and Watson plenty of time to......solve the crime.  No really.

Sherlock Holmes AGOS, has the same issue really with RDJ's other series sequel Iron Man 2.  Theres nothing really WRONG with it, it's just not as great as the first one.  While the first Holmes movie was peppered with great scenes this one has maybe 4 or 5 really great ones.  That makes it the Ace Ventura of action movies I suppose where the sequel isn't bad, but it's just inferior to the first film.

One character I must bring up is the Gypsy Woman who falls in line with Holmes and Watson on they're mission.  Shes actually interesting to the plot as her brother is caught up in Moriarty's evil.  She knows what shes doing and contributes something worthwhile IE, shes everything Irene Adler wanted to be in the first.  Speaking of which, Irene's screen time is so minor and her consequences so minimal, you'd be better off leaving her out completely.  A scene on a boat to France sums up her importance in the movie.

The biggest plus is that the shaky cam editing tricks during the "Holmes Vision" scenes is scaled back, but the movie still suffers from that crap Matrix "speed up-slow down" nonsense especially during an artillery attack later on in he movie.  Moriarty and Holmes do feel like equals in smarts in that while Holmes, while roguish does have a conscience, Moriarty does not and is a far smarter man and that just makes Sherlock work even harder to stop him.  Holmes is a man of action and you wonder why in the couple of times they meet face to face and exchange words..."why don't you just shoot him?!" but we all know Holmes would rather beat Moriarty with his mind and the final showdown with the two men, a literal and figurative game of chess is better then any fist fight we would have gotten from the two.

Sherlock Holmes A Game of Shadows, isn't a loss, it's at least as good as it's previous film, ramped up consequences, but the ongoing distraction of the Watson/Holmes, the Bond movie plot and Irene Adler's pointlessness dropped this one a little for me but I can overlook that due to the ending:  It's never in doubt no matter how much they try and tell us it is, but comes about in a way that is natural for the character involved, uses something unimportant from earlier in the movie and is a surprise.  I can appreciate seeing a surprise in a movie when I don't see it coming.  My own Holmes vision ruins some movies for me.

* PS, no OF COURSE Holmes and Watson are not really gay and I'm sorry if continuing to say that bothers anyone, but in the first movie and especially this one-try NOT noticing the way Watson and Holmes talk to each other.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
9
Thought-Provoking
9
Fun to Read
9
Well-Organized
9
Post a Comment
December 20, 2011
Hey! I am gay. And guess what. I agree with you. Its insulting and its not funny the way they go out of their way to make the gay connection between Watson and Holmes in this movie and in the original. I kept asking my self what are they trying to say. Why don't they just say it, or let it go already. And  the fact that I really did not like this movie has nothing to do with the gay references. Its just not a good movie in my opinion.
December 20, 2011
Maybe "bromance" would have been a better way to put it, but I still think that Irene is largely in the first movie to make sure we the audience know that Holmes has a case of the NotGays. It's the only thing she did, and then shes only in this movie so much and as SOON as Watson gets married, his wife goes away..... The next movie needs to pull this back.
December 22, 2011
I don't think its a bromance at all. I think they are lovers...lol.
 
December 18, 2011
I really don't know how I felt about this film. I mean, it wasn't bad and was competently made but for some reason even when it was looking so cool, it was a tad boring. Love your title! Watson and Holmes bickered like husband and wife; you are not the only reviewer that noticed that. Nice review and Quick tip!
December 19, 2011
I really had a hard time on how to feel about this film too. I liked it, but I kept wondering how much I like it and how much better it was then the first one. I didn't but I didn't dislike the movie either. I was getting worried that people were avoiding this review BECAUSE of the title. Glad to know thats not the case.
December 19, 2011
sure! If anything else your title attracted me so I had to read it LOL!
 
December 17, 2011
Needless to say your title grabbed my attention LOL - nice review!
December 19, 2011
Every good title should. Thank you for looking.
 
1
More Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Sha... reviews
review by . December 17, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Being quite familiar with Guy Ritchie’s works such as “Snatch” and “Lock Stock Two Smoking Barrels”, I know he is the kind of director who likes to cater to mainstream viewers. I wasn’t too fond with his “Sherlock Holmes” back in 2009, but I have to admit that it was fun escapist entertainment carried by strong performances from its cast. It was a simple formula that worked that it spawned this sequel “Game of Shadows” as Robert Downey …
review by . December 20, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
I didn't like the original. Why did I think I would like the sequel?
I really did not like the first Sherlock Holmes movie 2009 for many reasons.  I went to see it and was so sorry afterwards.  I don't know what I was expecting but I did not find it entertaining.  I thought it played to freely with the Sherlock Holmes legend and tried to turn it into a video game themed movie.  Now two years later I saw the trailer for the sequel and thought it looked really good.  I read the reviews and some were very good, while some were not.   …
review by . August 17, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
***1/2 out of ****    "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows" improves upon its predecessor in just about every way. Guy Ritchie has dropped the excessive green screen and employment of unnecessary slow-motion (although plenty is still present, just somewhat more, you know, NECESSARY) as well as the miscast Rachel McAdams from the original (who does appear here, but gets killed off early on, thank God). Ritchie seems to have understood what was wrong and what was right about his …
review by . December 21, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law return once again as Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson in “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows“. In this installment, a series of bombings across Europe has positioned the nations of the world on the brink of war. Holmes is convinced that there is a criminal mastermind behind the numerous, seemingly unrelated events and he believes it is renowned scholar James Moriarty (Jared Harris). Watson, well-accustomed to Holmes’ eccentric and erratic behavior, …
review by . December 20, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Star Rating:         The title is Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, and indeed, it’s all about the shadowy arts of cleverness and deception. This is to be expected when you have an adversarial relationship between two supremely intelligent men. I am, of course, referring to detective-for-hire Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey, Jr.) and Professor Moriarty (Jared Harris), both engaged in a deadly battle of wits in 1891 Europe. They’re each faced with the monumental …
review by . December 15, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
It was two years ago when Guy Ritchie debuted his take of the famous detective from Baker Street. From the outset it enraged traditionalist fans who did not want Sherlock Holmes to be a gritty street fighter. It was fun to watch as any blockbuster should be and Robert Downey Jr. was in the middle of his resurgence. Since that time Downey has become an A-lister while the original movie grossed $524 million dollars worldwide. So while certainly not a great movie it put butts in the seats and while …
Quick Tip by . December 20, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Caption
Guy Ritchie’s indulges in style, fast-editing and tricky camerawork to generate a feeling of tension in the action sequences. It is a well-made film and such formula was successful in the 2009 film, and in this sequel expect more of the same.      The plot in this sequel is pretty simple and offers little surprises. The acting was good as always, but the dialogue does feel obligatory at times and the interactions between Watson and Holmes resemble a married couple.   …
Quick Tip by . December 17, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Decent sequel to the 2009 hit has Sherlock and the newly wed Watson following Professor Moriarty's trail as he attempts to agitate events that will lead to World War 1. Plenty of what made the first great, but the homo eroticizm between the leads is un-ignorable nor is the fact that the story, while deep isn't as intriguing.
About the reviewer
John Nelson ()
Ranked #5
Born in Wausau Wisconsin. Move at an early age to Ventura California and lived for 8 years. Growing up in a big city landscape didn't prepare me for my next move: Archbold Ohio with a population of … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
TheJohn
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

Details

Cast:
Director: Guy Ritchie

First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Hype is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists