Movie Hype
New Releases, Oscar-Winners and Obscure Movies!

The weakest in the Star Wars series but also one of the most visually spectacular ....

  • Mar 25, 2010
Rating:
-2

"Star Wars: Episode I- The Phantom Menace" opened a whole new chapter in the Star Wars saga  introducing us to a young  9 year old Anakin Skywalker   during a time of moral conflict in the Galactic Republic. "Star War Episode II- Attack of the Clones" is set ten years after the events in the previous films and while it is more stunning and visually attractive than "The Phantom Menace". But as a continuation of the great Star Wars Saga "The Attack of the Clones" falls short of the glory of the franchise and film making in general.  It runs like a  bad T.V. movie something that you would see on the Sci-Fi channel, it  is hollow and bloated  it  squanders  the limitless imagination and potential it shows in favor  of being an  extravagant,  special effects action set piece.   

 

 

 

George Lucas'  " Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones" is like I said visually spectacular and is emotional   gripping but it lacks direction and   care, it lacks the labor of love Lucas put into the original trilogy and doesn't strive to push itself. It feels like Lucas didn't care to make it to please only to make money and tell Anakin Skywalker's story, which if it had a better script, more upbeat and emotional acting and a clear sense of direction this second installment of the prequel trilogy could have lived up to it's expectations, instead it falls flat on it's face and for 2hrs. 22min it doesn't get back up. It's not a terrible movie per say but it's not a good one either it sits in between mediocre and god awful leaning more towards mediocre. "Attacks of the Clones" is nowhere near good but what it is a visual action spectacle that has some amazing set pieces and action but nothing.

 

 

 

Ewan McGregor is good  but not good enough  to help lead the charge in this film  McGregor falls flat  in every scene that he is in  "The Phantom Menace" he held his own very well  but here  the material, the direction and the script are not strong enough to  help him boost his performances. Instead he comes out stale, bland and emotionless but still amazingly is not an eyesore. Hayden Christensen is not an actor I would call a favorite of mine, in fact I don't really like him at all.  He's bland, emotionless, and lifeless and devoid of power in his acting he doesn't convince you at all that he is the character he embodies. In fact he does just the opposite he completely strips you of all belief that his character (Anakin Skywalker) is someone deserving of great character status.  Christensen is   incapable of drawing any feelings from the audience but   I will say this in his favor   he does try and that, in some minuscule way, is something. Natalie Portman is not good nor bad nor terrible but just plain alright in this, Portman has done better work and this film is not one of them. Portman exudes a certain charm, style and sophistication that mange to make her believable under overwhelming circumstances and even then she doesn't convince but she never lets you down and that is something I recognize and appreciate, Portman is one of the highlights of this film and also one of the heavy hitters.  The rest of the cast including Christopher Lee, Frank Oz, Anthony Daniels, Temuera Morrison, Kenny Baker, Ian Diarmid and Samuel L. Jackson   all deliver fine supporting performances in what can easily be called the weakest if the Star Wars series.

 

 

 

"Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones" is nowhere near the greatness of the first three original films or the first film in the prequel trilogy, it has it's high points but sadly there only visual and not emotional and moving the actors try there best with the material there given but they just can't seem to make it work. It lacks energy and delight it makes you feels patronized and kiddish. It can't lift itself beyond its legacy   it tries to follow and for that it sinks under the weight of one of the most powerful series ever invented (The original trilogy). "Attack of the Clones" is not a Sci-Fi classic or a classic of any kind it’s only purpose is to serve as great rainy day entertainment when you have nothing else to do. Beyond that it’s only all style and no substance. 

The weakest if the Satr Wra series but also one of the most visually spectacular ....

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
6
Thought-Provoking
6
Fun to Read
6
Well-Organized
6
Post a Comment
October 21, 2010
Excellent review
 
March 28, 2010
yeh...you pretty much summed it up. I think this was the only one in the trilogy that I didn't go see it in theaters. Nice work!
 
1
More Star Wars: Episode II - Attack... reviews
review by . July 20, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
So when Obi Wan said
My very first review here on Lunch was my ESSAY about this movie.  Lets cut to a more condensed hate of this blight on the Star Wars film series.  Please see that review "He was a good Friend" in the moviesucktastic community for more. Years have passed between Phantom Menace and Anakin has grown and is being taught the Jedi arts.  Knowing how all powerful he is supposed to be coupled with Obi Wan keeping him on a short leash has made him angry and frustrated.  Anakin's …
Quick Tip by . July 24, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Horrifyingly boring, whiny and painful film that is a blight on the legacy of Star Wars. For major fanboys of Star Wars only.
Quick Tip by . July 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
This movie is worth the time and money just to see Hyden Christensen's performance showing another side of Darth Vader.
review by . June 10, 2009
Anakin Skywalker with disgust for Obi Wan
Star Wars was a good friend of mine and I almost lost this friend and never looked back because of this one film.  Star Wars has had a million things said about it, groundbreaking, trendsetting, exciting, fun, whimsical, innovative, landmark, I can go on.    Not one of those aforementioned adjectives comes into play when I think of this movie.    Millions of people flocked to see The Phanom Menace back in 1999 and it was the most hyped THING on the face …
Quick Tip by . May 11, 2010
Too wooden in acting and too mechanical in other qualities with the phoniest romance in the galaxy a long long time ago. Agonizing and bad.
review by . July 12, 2009
Despite Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menance giving George Lucas a big new bank account, the movie was panned by several critics and fans alike... mostly fans.  Were fans being a bit too picky or were they dead on with some of their complaints?  Well, a little bit.  Although the biggest criticisms of Lucas's prequel trilogy really doesn't stem from whether or not he got things right nearly as much as it centers on aspects such as the acting, too much CGI and the writing.  …
Quick Tip by . September 29, 2009
Too few moments of genuine fun. The rest of the movie is wooden from it's acting, the dialogue and the lead who is a pretty little pouter.
About the reviewer
C.R. Lopez ()
Ranked #11
Member Since: Nov 6, 2009
Last Login: Jul 7, 2012 09:53 PM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Lopez15
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Hype is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists