arichards
"While Strolling Through the Park One Day"






The film’s climax may disappoint some viewers as the film never does offer any solid answers; which is the whole point. I can just hear them now; so what was the cause? I thought it was quite good for Shyamalan to encourage these questions, but those who like being spoon-fed the details should just stay away. How can you explain the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle...of Rogue Waves? After all, how do you explain an “ACT OF GOD”?
What did you think of this review?
Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.
So I can't let M. Night get away with laziness on that part and the terrible script and the beyond awful acting (but M. Night just isn't a very good writer, is his problem). I think there has to be something more. Redeeming value of some sort. It doesn't have to be answers, but we shouldn't just accept laziness as "open ended and perhaps you should interpret for yourself." Especially from a guy who thinks he's a genius. I just can't let that kind of poor execution slide and I'm actually disturbed by the number of people who constantly jump up and defend any movie that causes thought-provocation. Just because it does I don't think that necessarily makes it a good or even acceptable film.
Or I just hated the movie that much, your choice, but I rarely go negative and The Happening was one of the few films I felt was worth going negative on.
It's a nice review, but I'm finding it hard to see through the fog on this one. I'm just not seeing that redeeming factor that so many others who've jumped in to defend this movie did.
I think part of this movie's failings in the fact that it didn't deliver on what folks expected from it. I do agree, that Shyamalan isn't that good a writer and is now showing his weaknesses as writer/director (my review on Devil and Last Airbender just showed his flaws), but I did like Unbreakable quite a bit, so he does have it, but I think he lost it.
Yes, there was some areas that needed better execution in this movie, and yes, Shyamalan is mistaken if he thinks he's a genius,( maybe that is what got him in this position in the first place. ) I guess as flawed as this movie was, it was better than the other garbage out there (I know, it's not an excuse)--it did have ambition (it actually planted the seed in the first act albeit too quickly), and you're right that it is no excuse to be lazy, but sometimes...I try to just maybe read too much between the lines.
Yeah, me, Jenny and Christy defended this movie before, and while I know it wasn't the best, I guess you can say I respected it for what it tried to do (unsuccessfully to most folks)but honestly, I sure wished it was better. Then again, I hated Lady in the Water....so maybe my expectations were very low and I was in the right mindset at the time with this film.
We'll see, this was an old review so let's see how I feel about it once I watch it again...this review was more of a reaction to the negative reviews it got in amazon saying that it was the plants in 5-10 sentences, maybe I just wanted to share my thoughts...
thanks for the read, bud!