Movie Hype
New Releases, Oscar-Winners and Obscure Movies!

A big letdown

  • Feb 27, 2009
Rating:
-3
Movie franchises, unlike most other human creations, often get worse with each subsequent incarnation. This is quite aptly illustrated with Brendan Fraser's Mummy franchise. The first Mummy came out in the spring of 1999, and was a commercial hit and probably the 2nd best movie of that year after the Matrix. The 2nd Mummy came out several years later, and though interesting, had some ludicrious scenes in it. This most recent Mummy just sucked. If there was ever a perfect example of a movie in which the dialogue was used solely to join adjacent action scenes together, and provide an occasional slinger, this is it. Unfortunately, even the action scenes were lackluster.

Worst of all, this movie lacked attention to detail in numerous scenes. I will expand on this last point. At the beginning of the movie, a narrator describes how the Dragon Emperor was turned to stone, and we see him frozen into a stance of pain and agony standing on the ground. Outside his palace, his army is frozen into stone while in battle formation. About 15 minutes later in the movie, this army is discovered in AD 1946, in a totally different formation, and the stone emperor is standing on a chariot holding the reins! How do stone warriors change their stance? Another screwed up scene was the episode in the Himalayas. By the constant blizzard, I would guess the temperature of this setting is around 0 degrees F. Several dozen characters are shown in this scene; many of them participating in dialogue, yet we cannot see any condensation from their breaths! And probably the worst scene of all is the final fight scene between Fraser's character, Rick, and Jet Li's chracter, the Dragon Emperor. Here we have numerous punches to the face on both sides, yet they each have perfect hair throughout the whole scene! Absolutely ridiculous!

Even after leaving out these detail flaws, the acting is also horrible. The romance scenes were totally contrived and rushed. The mother - daughter scenes seemed fake, and Jet Li's portrayal as the Dragon Emperor was totally off. His character seemed more like a general, or a magician, than that of an emperor. There was no hint of nobility, regality, or supremacy in his role; only violence. Probably the worst portrayal was that of Alex O'Connell. This guy is supposed to be British, raised in the snobbish upper-crust of British aristocracy. He seemed more like Indiana Jones. And this leads to the biggest flaw of the movie; it seemed like a watered-down version of an Indiana Jones movie. Overall, don't buy the DVD, and watch the movie only if you are really bored.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
0
Thought-Provoking
0
Fun to Read
0
Well-Organized
0
Post a Comment
More The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon ... reviews
review by . December 30, 2008
poster
Several years have passed since "The Mummy" (1999) and "The Mummy Returns" (2001) had made decent box-office outings. The second sequel (arguably unneeded sequel) to the action-fantasy franchise has a different director at the helm, in the name of Rob Cohen (The Fast and the Furious). If the first two films were any indication, Stephen Sommers is indeed a good action director; he knows how to make the wide camera angle, doesn't rely on slow motion and how to make his actors look quite good. Rob …
review by . December 18, 2008
posted in Movie Hype
Best to view this on a nice big television screen with a good upscaling DVD player, and a fabulous sound system with subwoofer. The Mummy is a visual and audio barrage - maybe even fireworks.    The story line is choppy, definately. It really doesn't make a ton of sense. The thing looks like Indiana Jones made all over again. This time with better computer graphics and better sound.     Brendan Fraser is sort of likeable here, just about the same character …
review by . December 12, 2008
posted in Movie Hype
There are a few reviewers who have said that these movies are great escapism, they're not meant to be taken seriously nor are the characters. The characters seem to be mere extensions of the old action movie clich├ęs of the past with Brendan Fraser being the tough talking action hero, and John Hannah being the wimpy slimeball who always survives thanks to the heroes. I have to be thruthful and say I've never watched the first two Mummy movies in their entirety, I have only caught them either at the …
review by . November 20, 2008
I did not believe that this movie could possibly be so bad until I saw it. I would have left when the Yeti came out except I was surrounded on either side. There is absolutely no chemistry between any of the characters-- they all act as though they are on the stage saying their lines by themselves. Brendan Frazier maintains one tone of voice throughout-- irritated and loud. Maria Bello as Evie is too "suave" with none of the endearing clumsiness of Rachel Weisz, and it looks as though she and Fraser …
About the reviewer
Newton Ooi ()
Ranked #171
Hi everyone, so here is the rundown of me. I like reading and writing, nonfiction for both. I love movies, especially original ones. I like nonfiction music, eating out, and basketball. I love to travel, … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
newtonooi
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

The third film in theThe Mummyseries freshens the franchise up by setting the action in China. There, the discovery of an ancient emperor's elaborate tomb proves a feather in the cap of Alex O'Connell (Luke Ford), a young archaeologist and son of Rick O'Connell (Brendan Fraser) and his wife Evelyn (Maria Bello, taking over the role from Rachel Weisz). Unfortunately, a curse that turned the emperor (Jet Li) and his army into terra cotta warriors buried for centuries is lifted, and the old guy prepares for world domination by seeking immortality at Shangri La. The O'Connells barely stay a step ahead of him (climbing through the Himalaya mountains with apparent ease), but the action inevitably leads to a showdown between two armies of mummies in a Chinese desert.The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperorhas a lot to offer: a supporting cast that includes the elegant Michelle Yeoh, Russell Wong, and Liam Cunningham, the unexpected appearance of several Yeti, and a climactic battle sequence that is nightmarishly weird but compelling. On the downside, the charm so desperately sought in romantic relationships, as well as comic turns by John Hannah (as Evelyn's rascal brother), is not only absent but often annoying. Rarely have witty asides in the thick of battle been more unwelcome in a movie. Rob Cohen's direction is largely crisp if sometimes curious (a fight between Fraser and Jet Li keeps varying in speed for some reason), but his vision of Shangri La, in the ...
view wiki

Details

Genre: Action, Adventure
DVD Release Date: December 16, 2008
Runtime: 112 minutes
Studio: Universal Studios
First to Review

"Feet of clay"
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Hype is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists