A Lunch Community
Green Lantern (2011)

A 2011 film, loosely based on the comic book of the same name, directed by Martin Campbell and starring Ryan Reynolds.

< read all 22 reviews

A not so stellar first live-outing for the Emerald warrior

  • Nov 3, 2011
Rating:
+2

Millions of years ago a race of immortals who safeguard the universe called the Guardians of the Universe, founded a group of intergalactic policemen called the Green Lantern Corp, whose job is to protect a sector of the universe. The Green Lanterns are armed with cosmic-powered rings that are only as strong as the bearer's will. One of their number Abin Sur (Temuera Morrison) neutralized a threat years ago named the Parallax. The being returns once again for revenge. Abin Sur is killed and his ring seeks out a new host, and he chooses ace pilot from Earth, Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds). -summary

It's getting to the point where some of these superhero films need a caution label before entering for the comic fans, and as a fan of Green Lantern and his world, I find it rather necessary here, since the result is not even a decent translation from the comic. When looking at this from a film fans perspective, then Green Lantern ends up as a mediocre movie. No matter which avenue I decide to take, Green Lantern just really isn't that good of a movie at all. Released a few months ago, Green Lantern directed by Martin Campbell is based on the DC character of the same name. Although Campbell provides a good enough introduction which was mainly meant for the non fans of the character. The movie really had a rushed feel and it could have benefited from a longer run time and serious editing.

I thought the special effects had moments where they were good. The CGI-laden battle scenes and attempts at heroism were kind of fun to watch. Campbell delivered some moments for the fans with Jordan using the ring. I liked the look for the world of Oa, as well as the over-sized, dark cloud that was the Parallax. Hal's CG looking costume didn't bother me, and I thought it was a nice look for this day and age. The action scenes have their fair share of destruction, however, they're not on the overly absurd level you will see in a Michael Bay movie.

I thought Hal's character was well developed, and he took to the ring and everything that comes with it in a realistic manner. The cowboy like attitude from the comics wasn't present here, as he showed signs of fear and uncertainty. Even as a fan of the comic it didn't really bother me, but there were other things instead that left me feeling uneasy.

The plot follows Hal, as he tries to battle against his own demons and live up to the responsibilities on being a Green Lantern. The Parallax makes its presence known, and embarks on a mission to destroy both the Earth and the Guardians of Oa.

Campbell really didn't work too well with the time given. At times, the movie felt as if it wasn't only a Green Lantern movie, but also a Green Lantern Corp movie, and I felt neither one was completely fleshed out. Hal's little training regimen wasn't the least bit believable, and his transition into the hero he could be wasn't that easy to buy into. Campbell made an attempt at displaying the Green Lantern Corp in action, however, this as well had way too much of an undeveloped feel. It seems as though you get a small portion of two servings, yet neither leaves you even half way full. I believe the movie should have taken a page out of Batman Begins, and focused more on Hal trying to master the ring or put him in small situations where he really had to work with it, instead of spending time on his possible love interest, who was only present for the sake of eye candy. It's strange, but the animated feature Green Lantern: First Flight managed to make this part of the character easy to digest in such a shorter run time, to include, it completely left out the female eye candy as the unnecessary plot device.

I really didn't like the choice of Parallax as the first lead villain. As a fan of the comic, it really did bother me since he's a far more complex villain. If they weren't going to go with a certain guy with a yellow ring, then perhaps Evilstar would have been a better choice as a first villain to go through. In any case, I felt no real chemistry here between the hero and villain. Reynolds as Green Lantern didn't bother me as much as it did others. I really don't think some of the blandness of the character was the fault of the actor, instead the writing concerning him was the main culprit. I didn't have an issue with any of the acting now that I think about it.

Green Lantern is a film that disappointed me plenty; from both perspectives, as a comic fan and  a movie fan. There should have been more of a focus on the main character. Towards the end of the movie, it felt a little too much as a vehicle to plan for the sequel, by giving Sinestro (Mark Strong) knowledge of the Yellow Element. Campbell tried his hand at too many things, and the end result was everything feeling half-assed. I only recommend this to those who just love action flicks and/or superhero movies.

The movie has a 114 minute run time.

Pros:
-Special Effects here and there

Cons:
-Nothing truly stands out

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
18
Thought-Provoking
18
Fun to Read
18
Well-Organized
18
Post a Comment
November 03, 2011
I definitely see your "Green Lantern Corps movie" point. Both Hal and the Corps were spread a bit too thin. To be honest, I wish that they would have expanded on the Corps a bit more. Eventually I'm going to get around to reviewing this film. I did like it quite a bit, but you presented all of your points quite well. Nice review!
November 04, 2011
Thanks. It would've been nice had they fully focused on which ever. It really lacked focus to me, and attempted way too much. Shoot me a message when you review it. I would like to see your take on it.
 
November 03, 2011
They should have merely adapted emerald dawn and then saved parallax for later. This was too gimmicky and certainly so mediocre for a movie with its budget. I did not like this one at all. One more review for "Emerald Knights" which I am awaiting....
November 03, 2011
It was way too early for Parallax, which was a lot of the reason I put this off. I really didn't see the logic in using him, unless the movie would have strictly been aimed for fans of the character and his world. I may get to Emerald Knights soon.
 
November 03, 2011
Good review. I liked it more than you did, but you brought up some good points. The after-credits scene gave me hope for a better sequel.
November 03, 2011
Thanks. It was disappointing for me because it felt as if it lacked a clear focus. It tried its hand at too many things and it didn't do well at any of them.
November 03, 2011
That's the same reason I was not thrilled with the last Spiderman film!
 
November 03, 2011
I just can't bring myself to watch this. The cast, the director, and the script all seem so out of sync with the mood of the comics and the characters that I just avoided. Truth be told, I was never a big Green Lantern fan to begin with.
November 03, 2011
If you were never a fan, then an even better reason to avoid it.
November 03, 2011
Never a big fan. I like some of the story lines (especially in the '70s when Green Lantern was paired with Green Arrow under the guidance of Julius Schwartz, Denny O'Neil, and Neal Adams), but so often the Green Lantern mythos comes off as too outlandish and silly. And of course, when being portrayed by Ryan Reynolds, silly is what you get.
November 03, 2011
The thing is, I think Rayner is more intersting than Jordan. Which does make sense since Rayner is better written than Jordan's roots in the early days. They weren't as creative back then....
November 03, 2011
Is it just me, or did DC really have some seriously mediocre writers back in 60's - 80's when compared to Marvel?
November 03, 2011
Yes and no. DC was much more straight-forward whereas Marvel was tossing out some really great ideas. I mean, had it not been for the Scwartz, O'Neil, and Adams team, a lot of the DC characters might not be around today. Both Green Arrow and Detective Comics were on the chopping block.
November 03, 2011
And Agreed, Will, Jordan is a fairly dull character. He's only really interesting when he's caught up in an epic story, but alone, as a catalyst, he doesn't have much personality.
November 03, 2011
I would say DC is more limited. and yes, while I agree about O'Neil being one of the best writers, you have to remember that he shined a lot more in his run at Marvel....why? they were willing to take risks. When you say Schwartz...you mean Julius?
November 03, 2011
Of course.
 
1
More Green Lantern (2011 movie) reviews
review by . June 19, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
The Emerald Warrior In His First Full-Length Feature Film....is a Bit of A Poozer* !!
With all the follow-up successes (if mixed) Marvel had achieved with their comic book adaptations, of course DC would do well to try and follow up with the groundbreaking success of “Batman Begins” and “The Dark Knight”. With the rather mediocre film but mixed success that is “Superman Returns”, DC is looking for the next big thing. “Green Lantern” is somewhat of an oddball choice to try to begin a new franchise, but I am rather both happy and at …
review by . November 16, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
From all the harsh reviews and knowing that it starred someone who is principly a comedian (having remembered how brutal The Green Hornet was), I was reluctant to spend any "quality" time watching this. Well it became available at the library so I took it out and with nothing on tv but Dancing With the Stars, I decided to pop it in the DVD player. It actually held my interest throughout. Furthermore, Reynolds played the role in a fairly "straight" manner.    It starts out with …
review by . November 08, 2011
Emeralds Aren't A Fanboy's Best Friend But....
I've always enjoyed watching DC Comics' stable of heroes in cartoons and films more than actually reading about them in comics.  To me, DC's heroes were, for the most part, more "super" than Marvel's crop of characters.  They always seemed to be a bit more fantastical and otherworldly.  Sure, Marvel has plenty of heroes who acquired there powers from things like radioactive spiders and the force cosmic, but they always came across as more …
review by . June 25, 2011
The Lantern Ring clearly didn't edit this movie.
I'm approaching this movie much the way I did with the Sherlock Holmes movie from a little back.  I have only a slight grasp on the character and the source material, so as long as the movie is entertaining and makes sense then I the regular ticket buyer shouldn't be annoyed by the touches that the comic fans will no doubt be looking for.  I'm not going to get bummed out say if, Green Lantern's costume doesn't look right or if he drives a Mustang instead of a Charger …
review by . November 07, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
I was prepared to love this movie. It had everything I would enjoy in a comic book super hero movie including the good looking hero, outstanding special effects. So what happened? I did like it, but did not love it. It definately needed some editing. It took forever for the story to take off. I know they had to explain all the back story, but it was so slow moving in the beginning. Coming from director Martin Campbell I was surprised. He usually starts off running and leaves you breathless. I would …
review by . June 18, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Green Lanterns Light Shines
Ive never been a fan of DC Comics, Ive always been a Marvel fanboy. Although fictional Marvels superheroes just seem more realistic to me..........more believe able. That and some of the harsh reviews I read about this movie made me go into the theater with very low expectations.        Enter Hal Jordan an unorthodox US Military fighter pilot. After his reckless behavior causes him to crash an F-35 he is chosen by the ring of Abin Sur to replace him as guardian …
review by . June 27, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Green Lantern is a very flawed movie-going experience. It’s by no means a “good” movie, but it doesn’t fall into the ranks of the “superhero movie gone wrong” league of the horrifyingly awful “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer” or “Daredevil”, or even the “close but no cigar” category like “Batman Forever” or “The Spirit”. Instead, in a much more tragic fashion, Martin Campbell’s Green …
review by . June 18, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
   I discovered comic books back in the mid 1980s. We lived near a convenience store that stocked a fairly large number of them. I remember well going down there, getting a strawberry ice cream cone, playing some Super Mario Bros and buying comics. Being an imaginative child, and a fan of science fictiony stuff, I very quickly gravitated to Green Lantern. And why not? Here was a set of stories that often took place in space, featured aliens by the gross and had a ring that could be used …
review by . June 18, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Star Rating:         Green Lantern does not seem to know who it was made for. There are expository sections of story so densely packed with detail that they will (1) confuse and alienate those who are not intimately familiar with the original comic book, and (2) bore those who are. Most of the characters are badly developed while the rest are introduced and then immediately dropped. Specific events are either explained at too great a length or not explained enough. …
review by . June 17, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
'Green Lantern' 'Two Jews On Film' Agree-This Comic Book Super Hero Falls To The Ground (Video)
      Okay, so this is how the story goes...In a universe far, far away (where else would it be) an elite, powerful force has existed for centuries.  Protectors of peace and justice, they are called the Green Lantern Corps.        Helpful fact to know, for those of you unfamiliar with the DC comic...Green is the color of will.  Yellow is the color of fear.  So...green is good...yellow, bad...very very bad.   …
About the reviewer
Member Since: May 22, 2011
Last Login: Jun 15, 2013 08:21 PM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Madpenguin
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki


Directed by Martin Campbell. With Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively, Peter Sarsgaard. A test pilot is granted a mystical green ring that bestows him with otherworldly powers, as well as membership into an intergalactic squadron tasked with keeping peace within the universe.

Visit IMDb for Photos, Showtimes, Cast, Crew, Reviews, Plot Summary, Comments, Discussions, Taglines, Trailers, Posters, Fan Sites
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1133985/

As far as superheroes go, Green Lantern may lack the clean, iconic lines of his more respectable DC counterparts Superman and Batman, but the very wonkiness of the premise (earthling joins elite force of space cops) lends itself to a pulpy, operatic, not-entirely-serious approach. (One of his teammates is a talking carrot, after all.) Capitalizing on a charming performance by Ryan Reynolds, the feature-film adaptation is a big, messy movie that, at its best, generates a feeling of aw-shucks wonder. Much likeThor, it isn't afraid to loosen up on the inner turmoil of its hero and go macro. Based on comic writer Geoff Johns's retrofitting of the title character, the story follows Hal Jordan (Reynolds), an impulsive test pilot whose encounter with a dying alien leaves him with an energy ring capable of weaponizing his imagination. While struggling to master his will-based powers, he must deal with threats both earthbound (a hilariously nebbishy Peter Saarsgard, who may be the first supervillain to rock a hoodie) and galactic. Martin ...
view wiki

Details

Director: Martin Campbell
Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Special Interest
Release Date: 17 June 2011
MPAA Rating: PG
Screen Writer: Greg Berlanti
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
© 2013 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Movie Trailers is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists