This is not a book about teaching creative writing in mathematics and science nor is it a book about the role creative writing has in math and science. It is instead a collection of short works that have at least some of their content based in math and science. Some are stories, two are nonfiction, many are works of prose and two are segments of plays. When comparing the contents of this book to other imaginative works such as those collected by people like Clifton Fadiman, I found some of them uninspiring and often lacking in mathematical or scientific substance. In my opinion, using the terms math and science to describe works of creative writing means that there is a heavy dose of the topics; mere mention of some scientific terms in the work is not enough. This criticism done, there were a few that I considered first-rate.
Published in "Journal of Recreational Mathematics" reprinted with permission.
What did you think of this review?
Fun to Read
What's your opinion on The Shape of Content: An Anthology of Cr...?