|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

< see more 'Glee GQ Photoshoot Controversy' questions
a question by Oct 22, 2010
Do you think these photos of the Glee cast taken for GQ are inappropriate?
show text editor
You have exceeded the maximum length.
Answers
Showing 1-2 of 2
answered:    October 26, 2010
If you're referring to these (http://www.gq.com/entertainment/movies-and-tv/201011/glee-photos-rachel-quinn-finn#slide=2) I think I have to say "Yes". I may be getting old and prudish but - seriously - isn't this a light-hearted show that attracts loads of kids? Is it really acceptable to pose actors portraying teenage girls like this? And in a men's mag? Actually, check this out: http://www.gq.com/entertainment/movies-and-tv/201011/glee-photos-rachel-quinn-finn#slide=5. Apart from the astonishingly poor lighting, it's pretty to hard to argue the case that it's anything other than exploitative porn.
Share  
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Was this helpful?
3
answered:    October 23, 2010
I don't think it's inappropriate, it's GQ, after all and this could easily be on a Cosmopolitan cover. What may be a tad bit inappropriate is the "what happens when teachers aren't around..." tagline. If you just left it at what it is, a piece on the cast (who are all adult actors) that's one thing. But, when you actually make the correlation between that and high school kids, people may be slightly offended.
Share  
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Was this helpful?
3
Post a Comment
Lunch Average Rating: -3 (1 rating)
Photos
Glee GQ Controversy
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists