A 2008 film directed by Christopher Nolan. ... see full wiki
This movie was by far the best batman movie that has been made yet. The acting was really good on all points but Heath Ledger totally took center stage as the joker. Everything from his facial expressions to his voice and the way he moved was absolutely perfect! I was also surprisingly impressed with the costumes. The joker costume was perfect, it really looked more like the costume from the comic books than previous jokers did. And the batsuit was actually kind of sexy looking, it lacked the hard plastic fakeness of previous batmen it looked more like it was painted on in some places. That suit in combination with the sexy growl his voice takes on when he is angry is enough to make me buy the DVD! The special effects where pretty awesome too. From explosions, to the cool batmobile, and the gliding batsuit, the effects made watchers really get sucked into the movie and watch the whole thing (and it was pretty long). The ending of the movie really surprised me. When Harvey and Rachel are both kidnapped and tied to gasoline cans i really didn't expect Rachel to be the one who dies being as she is Batman's ex-girlfriend. But then i also see how it was necessary because the burning, the scars and the grief is what drives Harvey to become two-face. This is a really great film, if you didn't get a chance to see it in theaters it will be an excellent addition to your movie collection.
Rarely has a film left me speechless, much less a comic book inspired film. Christopher Nolan's rendition of the DC comic character has. "THE DARK KNIGHT" may well be the best comic book film I have ever seen. Christopher Nolan, along with Jonathan Nolan has crafted a screenplay of nearly unbelievable proportions. The duo has taken the "Batman" mythos and has turned it into their own; what results is a film that captures the essence of the comic book and combines it to a truly gripping and engaging psychological crime drama-action-adventure. You heard that right, a psychological crime drama and an adventure.
I'll get right to the point, you don't need to read any reviews, (including this one) just watch this film. It stomps Burton's rendition of the caped crusader to the ground and may well eat "Batman Begins" for breakfast, lunch and dinner; all the more evolving the concept of Gotham City's "Dark Knight".
Still here, no trust? Ok then, here we go…

Gotham City is the battle ground. The mysterious "Batman" has the crime element by its ear. Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) is an incorruptible force in court and Lt. James Gordon (Gary Oldman) has his special unit to combat crime. Seems like a good time to be in Gotham, doesn't it? Wrong.
A mysterious "Joker" (Heath Ledger) has surfaced and seemed poised to take Gotham's soul by creating mass hysteria and chaos. Gotham's population is at the mercy of this madman--and what does he want? To prove a point.
Christopher Nolan has impressed me before, with his films; "Blade" and "Memento". But never as much this time around. The director has abandoned the idea that "Batman" has to have a comic book feel. The film goes for the comic book's soul. Nolan is armed with a near flawless script that exudes the spirit of Gotham City as well as its Dark Angel. If there are any holes in it then I cannot see it. The movie is unstoppable, the direction it went is awe-inspiring that it almost gave me goose bumps. The movie not only portrays the usual Batman vs. Joker main event, it also defines the meaning of the word "hero" as well as the morality that surrounds the idea.
"The Dark Knight" has a lot of characters and the film develops each one. No one is a plot device, everyone has a purpose in the screenplay. Heath Ledger gives the performance of his career (Rest in Peace, Heath) and trumps Nicholson's portrayal. Ledger's "Joker" is very reminiscent of the Joker in the comic book "The Killing Joke". The maniac is not after money, he has no grand scheme but he wants to prove a point. This Joker isn't joking around, this villain is frighteningly twisted, maniacal and homicidal. Ledger performs as if he saw the adage: "Crazy people don't know they're crazy" and brings all to bear. There is no "origin" as to where he came from, although his past was suggested by his "quippy" remarks. The Joker will remain an enigma in this film, and I think it was a very smart move to do so. Christian Bale is still a great Bruce Wayne and as his alter-go. Bale changes his voice to a raspy one when he is Batman. Aaron Eckhart is an intriguing Harvey Dent, the district attorney is charismatic, heroic and the embodiment of Gotham's hope, until he--well, has a very bad day. Yes, Two-Face makes an appearance and not to worry, the character won't be one-dimensional.


The film's success is that the plot has attained a life of its own. The characters can breathe and everything has a purpose. The film's main premise is not limited to our two nemeses. Even Gotham City itself has become a character in the movie as well as its inhabitants. Gotham is portrayed as a melting pot of chaos and disorder and one nudge towards the wrong direction may unbalance the city's moral fiber. Yes, the film has its bit of morality in it and explores the decency of everyday folk. Before, in "Batman Begins" James Gordon and Bruce's lost love Rachel (Maggie Gyllenhaal) embodied this idea, but the concept is more widely expressed this time around. The Joker's target is the soul of Gotham and never more has the stakes been this high. The Mantle of the Bat is by itself a separate entity from Bruce and the concept is even given more depth, just what it means and what it is.
The movie still has the tank-like Batmobile and a newer version of a Bat-cycle or in this case, a "Bat-Pod". The mantle of the Bat has undergone some updates to make it lighter but for me, it looked bulkier. Tim Burton's rendition of the Bat-suit may have the edge over this one but none are more accurate than the Bat suit in the fan film: ‘Batman Dead End". If the film had a fault, is that the fight sequences need some smoothening up. They're not bad, it's just that it's not as hard-hitting as I would've liked and the camera work needs to hang back a little bit so the audience can see the fight a little more. The action sequences itself are exciting, the movie does have some very cool car chases which are intense and adrenaline-pumping; further complemented by Hans Zimmer‘s powerful soundtrack. The proceedings have that somber but intimidating "dark" feel that the film's cinematographer needs to be commended. The visuals are great, the CGI doesn't look they're CGI at all.


There are cleverly placed bits of humor that help the film's pace. Alfred (Michael Caine) supplies the sarcasm that is reminiscent of his character. The sarcastic exchanges between him and Wayne give a lot of depth to their relationship. Morgan Freeman reprises his role as "Lucius Fox" and his character has a humorous exchange in sarcasm with a Wayne Enterprises employee. Fox also has a significant role as Bruce's conscience almost as much as Alfred himself. Even "The Joker" adds some twisted bits of black humor--"I have a magic trick..", boy, what a way to add an exclamation point to his character. The bits of humor help the film balance its darkness towards its gripping build-up to its end game.
BATMAN is a dark character and he is arguably the most interesting character in DC's line of comic books. The man is an enigma and very mysterious. Obsessed? Crazy? a Genius? This man is an urban legend and Nolan and company has successfully represented all these factors. Ledger's performance may have taken the spotlight since this is his last film and he does somewhat steal the show from Bale--from Bale not the character itself.
I'm not exactly sure how Christopher Nolan will be able to top this film. The promise of things to come and its climax has such an impact the way everything was structured through its storytelling. Comic book fans have a reason to rejoice, the director has taken the Batman myth to new heights. "The Dark Knight" is epic, deliciously exciting, unforgettable, groundbreaking, scary and manages to put the audience in the struggle between Gotham's Dark Knight and his arch-nemesis. The film is very sincere and precise in its execution.
HIGHEST POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATION! [5- Stars]
This review is Dedicated to the Memory of Heath Ledger.

Finally, after what seems like an eternity of buzz, waiting, hype, and tragedy, what could easily be the biggest movie of 2008 is upon us: Christopher Nolan's second installment in his re-imagining of DC Comics' Batman, The Dark Knight. Does this mammoth two-and-a-half-hour superhero magnum opus live up to expectations? The simple answer is yes.
With The Dark Knight Nolan has crafted what may be the greatest superhero film to date. In a summer where Marvel blew the doors wide open with the lighthearted and fun Iron Man and then followed up with an entertaining rebooting of The Hulk, it looked like DC was at a distinct disadvantage in this whole cinematic superhero renaissance. Hell, even superheroes who never appeared in a comic book (Hancock) are raking in box office dough by the fistful. Fortunately for DC, their lone summer offering features their most interesting character by far (I know there are guys out there who would argue for Superman—but Batman's internal conflicts and existential crises make him a lot more interesting than The Man of Steel in my opinion), a fantastic ensemble cast, a director on top of his game, and an aesthetic presence that's so far removed from the Marvel comic book films that it often feels like a different genre entirely.
Iron Man is a great film, filled with fun and fluff and powered along by a fantastic performance from Robert Downey Jr. It's exactly the sort of thing filmgoers expect from a "comic book movie"—meaning lots of fights, explosions, and good times. The Dark Knight is almost a diametric opposite—it's a somber and heavy affair with a surprising amount of philosophical weight. It doesn't skimp on the action, mind you, but surrounds the action with an air of seriousness that has been lacking in this particular type of film to date. Because of this, comparisons between The Dark Knight and other superhero films are going to be hard to make. This film stands in stark contrast to the typical comic book movie and has more in common with the noir crime films of the 1940s than it does with caped crusaders. Because of this, I find myself loving the film but wondering what the popular consensus is going to be. I'm sure there are people who will find the tone of The Dark Knight at odds with their expectations. Some will accept and appreciate the film for what it is, while others will walk away sorely disappointed and wondering what all the praise is for.
I don't want to spend much time on the plot of the film—so here's a very brief rundown.
Christian Bale is back as Batman. He's cleaning up Gotham City, and along with Jim Gordon and new DA Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) they're making quite a bit of progress. Of course, Batman's success has led to a spate of "copycat" vigilantes working the streets—which certainly makes things tougher on the real Dark Knight. In fact, the public isn't even entirely sure what to make of Batman anymore. Anyway, The Joker (Heath Ledger) turns up and things get really interesting. And that's all I'm saying about the plot. No spoilers here.
Nolan's direction continues to inspire in this outing. When Tim Burton was making Batman films, the movies featured a decidedly gothic looking Gotham City. At the time, I remember being quite taken with the effect. Nolan has dropped this in favor of a more industrialized look that seems to work even better than the gothic aesthetics of the older films. Gotham City in Nolan's film has a very oppressive feel to it—you can almost taste the danger that potentially lurks around every corner. In this regard, Gotham City is almost a character in its own right. It's a living, breathing metropolis that will beat you down if you're not careful.
The only real negative in the direction of this film is found in the editing of the action scenes. The frantic, quick-cut editing style worked well in Batman Begins because Batman often attacked out of the shadows ninja-like precision. It doesn't work as well in The Dark Knight because the action scenes feel more traditional and less like guerilla warfare. Because of this, the hyper-edits mostly serve to make the action confusing at times. It's not a major flaw, but it is something worth mentioning. It's one of the few flaws in a fantastically lensed film.
The cast is uniformly excellent. Bale is a fantastic Batman, the perfect mix of playboy playfulness as Bruce Wayne and tortured crime fighter as Batman. You can sense that the time between the two films has allowed Bale to refine his take on the dual characters, and the end result is an even more nuanced performance than his first time out in the cowl. He remains the only actor other than Adam West to make the character his own. It's a far different appropriation, of course, but from here forward there are only going to be two men who spring to mind when Batman is mentioned—West and Bale.
The rest of the cast is equally impressive. Aaron Eckhart continues to demonstrate just how diverse an actor he is. Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine bring depth and respectability to their roles. Gary Oldman is Gary Oldman—I love the guy. Maggie Gyllenhall makes a fine replacement for Katie Holmes. The performances are great.
And now, we must spend a few minutes talking about Heath Ledger's portrayal of The Joker. Since Ledger's unfortunate passing, there's been a great deal of debate about whether or not he deserves a posthumous Oscar, whether he or Jack Nicholson was the better Joker, and if this is a performance for the ages. I can't answer any of these things definitively (and neither can anyone else—it's all subjective opinion), but I can tell you what I think of the performance.
I wasn't a fan of the Ledger casting when I first heard it. I couldn't offer up a viable alternative, but I just couldn't see this guy as The Joker. My fears were further confirmed when I saw footage of him in the role—his "Joker voice" was awful. The final nail in the pre-release coffin for me was the PG-13 rating. I understand wanting the PG-13, but when a Batman film does a Joker story with a PG-13 rating, the character is greatly reduced. As comic fans know, the Joker is not just a crazy clown—he's a full blown psychopath. The Joker kills with impunity and complete disregard for human life—innocent or not. Being restricted by a PG-13 rating generally means that this character will be neutered. It's just the nature of the business.
That being said, Ledger's Joker is the closest cinematic interpretation to the comic book version to date. I love Nicholson's Joker in the first movie—he's borderline psycho, he gets great quotes, but he also brings in a little of the Cesar Romero Joker's campiness. Ledger is genuinely scary at various parts of the film—which is a dimension that Nicholson's Joker never quite had. There's no campiness in this portrayal (unless you count his voice—which still bothers me). This is the finest portrayal of the character in terms of bringing the monster of the comics to the big screen. That being said, this takes nothing away from Nicholson's performance—the two movies are so different that comparing the Jokers is essentially pointless. Both characters work perfectly in their respective films and wouldn't work at all in the other. Nicholson's Joker in The Dark Knight would be a disaster, and Ledger's in Batman wouldn't be any better.
Whether or not Ledger deserves an Oscar is hard to say. We haven't seen everything that's coming out this year, so it's really too early to tell. It's a very good performance though, and I wouldn't be surprised if it did garner a nomination. I'd just hope it would be because Academy Voters were pleased with the performance and not the groundswell sympathy movement that seems to be afoot.
Finally, I've read a lot of glowing praise saying that Ledger gives a performance worthy of DeNiro or Marlon Brando. I don't know that I'd go quite that far personally. The real tragedy of Ledger's performance here is that it does show signs of brilliance—of an actor coming of age and learning his craft. He may have become a DeNiro or Brando later in his career, but crowning him as such now is shortsighted and a disservice to two men had an entire body of work that was impressive as opposed to two performances. It would be nice if we all could just enjoy Ledger's performance for what it is—a truly inspired interpretation of a character who's very hard to portray accurately—instead of trying to hyperbolize it and place it into some historical context whether it fits or not.
In the end, The Dark Knight stands alongside Iron Man as my favorite films of the summer blockbuster season. The two movies are so different (despite sounding so similar) that it's all but impossible to compare them with any kind of objectivity. Nolan's film has a few very minor flaws (it could have been a little shorter, the editing could have been tighter), but nothing detracts from the power of the performances and the director's vision. Not everyone is going to like this film—but anyone who considers themselves a connoisseur of superhero films needs to see it anyway.
I'd heard good things prior to the viewing so my expectations were admittedly high, but I have to say...this movie lived up to the hype.
Story: Typical of superhero tales...villain threatens/harms the innocent...hero comes to the rescue...and the battle of good vs. evil ensues. Although there really wasn't anything that hadn't been done before, the plot was well-executed and the action moved the story along at a nice pace. This movie ran for almost three hours but definitely didn't feel that long. One aspect in particular...I thought Christopher Nolan did a particularly good job of pulling off the underlying themes of the film - those of faith and trust...the different forces that drive each of us to do the things we do and shape the people we are...the choices we make when we're put to the test...and the need we all have for something to believe in.
Performances: Or should I say Performance. Heath Ledger as the Joker...probably not many people's first choice for the role. But after seeing the film, he may very well have been the best, if not only choice. Whoever made that decision...Genius. He so fully inhabited the psychopath persona that even when something was meant to be comical, the humor is tempered by that eerie prickle on the back of the neck that precedes total chaos and mayhem. The performance hit all the right notes...subtle when needed and over-the-top when called for. Almost made you forget this isn't the Joker's story.
Overall assessment...Better than Batman Begins and pretty much blows any other previous Batman endeavors out of the water. Much like how Hollywood seems to want to pretend the AngLee version of the Incredible Hulk never happened...this is how I prefer to think of the earlier Batman films. That those five cartoonish farces (seriously, were there really that many?) were just a bad dream and that Batman Begins and the Dark Knight encompass the entirety of his representation on celluloid. So far.More Topics like 'The Dark Knight'