He is most critical of Chesterton for his humor and his Christianity, perhaps most especially when one is used in service of the other. Yet he does concede that Chesterton is right when he says that the opposite of funny is not unfunny; "A man may be perfectly serious in a funny way," says West, in perhaps the most powerful praise one could offer up to Chesterton.
In perhaps his most interesting criticism of Chesterton West says that Chesterton fails to distinguish the difference between a Christian and a Crusader. "The [Christian] attempts to show his love to his enemy by abolishing his unchrstianness, the [Crusader] by abolishing him altogether." Perhaps in the Christian culture of his day Chesterton seemed heavy handed in his defense of Christianity; today as Christianity fights to stay relevant or even engaged in the culture, he sound like a welcome voice of victorious strength.Much of the rest of West's criticism centers on small sidebars of Chesterton's writing that are no longer particularly relevant or even read today, which perhaps proves the truth of West's critique but also the danger of offering it so soon. History has voted. Chesterton (most of him, anyway) remains read and relevant; West remains a footnote.
What did you think of this review?