SF Signal
SF Signal
A community for science fiction fans!
Star Trek Poster

J.J. Abrams reboot/prequel to the "Star Trek" film franchise.

< read all 41 reviews

Are you out of your Vulcan mind?! Star Trek Review!

  • May 3, 2009
  • by
Rating:
+5
Just as a warning, this review is going to be very spoilerific, so if you hate spoilers don't read this, but I just can't help myself. Now then, may I just say that this might be the BEST Star Trek Film ever?! And that's not comparing it to The Wrath of Khan or First Contact. This Trek film stand alone among all of the other ones. When J.J. Abrams set off to make a Trek film that was accessible to both non-fans and fans, he apparently knew just what he was doing. This film was also an ensemble piece. It would have been nothing without its cast.

Like I said, this movie was all about the cast. Without it, the film would have been just another action movie, but these actors came together and really became the Crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise. All throughout the film you are taken on a roller coaster ride of emotion and comedy. And if you are a fan of the original series, than there are so many little moments of nostalgia that only fans will understand that you feel like you are going to have a geekasm. Mainly, this is a story about how Kirk and Spock and the rest of the gang all got together and how they all learn to understand one another (for the most part). I would talk about the whole crew, but I feel like that would be the longest review ever so I'm going to talk about who I liked the most starting with whom I thought was the best of the best, Karl Urban as Leonard "Bones" McCoy.

I know that these actors were supposed to take takes these characters and make them their own, but I feel like Bones is an exception to that because If I didn't know any better, I thought I was watching DeForest Kelly in that film. I mean Karl urban just takes what Kelly did with Bones and in my mind doubles it. Every little thing that you would want Bones to do in Star Trek he did, from asking Spock if he was "Out of your Vulcan mind?!" or being snide with Kirk on the Bridge to asking for Nurse Chapel in sickbay even though she wasn't in the Film. He just was Bones and every time he talked, I laughed. Unfortunately there were no, "He's dead Jim's" in the film, but I was more than pleased with everything else. I have a bone to pick with one Mr. Orlando Parfitt, who reviewed Star Trek for IGN.uk. Besides you being the only one who thought this movie wasn't all that great, you also said and I quote, "whilst Karl Urban's "Bones" McCoy and Simon Pegg's Scotty are actually rather disappointing. You never felt Bones was Kirk's best mate." I don't know what movie you watched because while I slightly agree with you about Pegg as Scotty, Urban as McCoy was Kelly resurrected. Not to be rude, but you might want to go and re-watch the film.

On the subject of Mr. Scott, out of all the cast, I feel like he was most different aside from the fact that he wasn't trying to be different. So that is one thing I agree with Mr. Parfitt. In my mind, no one can possibly replace James Doohan. Though in defense of Simon Pegg, he did bring something new to the character in the form of major comic relief were I thought in the original series that was mostly left to Bones. This new Scotty was very funny and a new character all together and most definitely still a Scotsman by and by.

Next up is Zachary Quinto as Spock. WOW! You really don't realize how much Quinto and Nimoy look and act alike until you watch the scene between the two of them. Quinto took Spock, made something completely new and fresh while still leaving the essence of Nimoys version intact. This Spock unlike the Spock we have come to know is full of both logic and emotion. There are scenes between Spock and Bones were all Spock does is quote logic and then there is a scene near the end of the movie were Kirk is trying to reason with Nero, offering him the chance to surrender instead of destroying him and Spock turns to him and asks, "What are you doing Captain?" In which Kirk replies with something along the lines of, "I was using logic to try and reason with him, I thought you would appreciate that?" and Spock answers knowing what Nero did to Vulcan, "No, not in this circumstance" Totally awesome and it makes you realize that this is a new fun Spock. Also in traditional Spock manor, Quinto did an amazing job balancing the emotional scenes (especially with his relationship with Uhura) with the scenes were it was supposed to be all logic Spock. Great job!

Finally, we get to Chris Pine as Captain James T. Kirk. I will say this to begin with, do not go into this movie thinking that Pine took anything from William Shatners portrayal of Kirk because he didn't, he made it his own. I think if Pine had tried to put some Shatner into his acting, it would not have done well for the character. From the introduction of Pines Kirk, we meet this rebellious cocky man who thinks he is all that and then some and in all rights he is, but never the less. What happens when you're cocky? You pay for it and he does by getting beat up a lot in this film. When Pike tells him he can be an officer in four years, Kirk tells him he can do it in three. Pine has those cocky good looks that makes the acting so much more believable as well. The best Kirk scene is when he cheats on the Kobayashi Maru test, something fans have been wanting to see for a long time. This is the only scene that reminded me of Shatner due to the fact that while the whole test is going on, Kirk is eating an apple the same way he was in The Wrath of Khan explaining how he passed to Saavik. It was a great scene. Pine and Quinto both do an amazing job with each other building up their relationship throughout the movie, going from really hating each other, to forming what will become their everlasting friendship. This is very apparent when Spock actually calls Kirk Jim for the first time. Great job by both actors in this film since really, this movie is mainly about Kirk and Spock.

Very quickly I want to just mention that I really enjoyed Bruce Greenwoods portrayal of Captain Pike. he did an amazing job at being a true leader of the Enterprise crew in this film. Also, I thought Leonard Nimoy did a fantastic job coming back into the role of Spock. It must have been hard to come back into the role after being away from it for so long and he nailed it perfectly, especially in the scene between he and Kirk. As far as the Enterprise, I was in awe. They did an amazing job capturing the essence of what this great ship looks and feels like as well as what it represents. If you are a big fan of TOS, than keep a close eye and ear out for some great TOS nostalgia in both the movie and on board the Enterprise.

There were only two things that really bothered me about this movie. The first being that the Enterprise and the Kelvin are both these amazing tricked out apple store looking ships. I mean the insides just look amazing, but than you get to see the engineering sections of both the ships and they look like modern day (2009) factories (the engineering scenes were shot at Anheuser-Bush Brewing factories). I guess I can understand them wanting to have these sections of the ship look like what a real engine room of a ship looks like, but it is just not consistent with what the rest of these ships look like. The other thing I had a problem with was the fact that in the TOS, Spock and Pike are supposed to be very close friends. In the series Spock commits mutiny in him name. I didn't get the sense of comradery between the two at all. I don't know if this is because they really wanted to focus on the Kirk/Spock relationship or because it is in fact an alternate universe, but I would have liked to have seen that.

Like I said up top, Star Trek is an ensemble piece and every actor made this film come to life. If you are not a fan, don't sweat! You can see this film! If you are a Trekkie, prepare to have your mind blown! The two problems I had with the movie are not enough to take away a five spot from it, a BIG 5/5!
Star Trek Poster The Enterprise The Bridge Spock The Crew Star Trek

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
63
Thought-Provoking
18
Fun to Read
20
Well-Organized
16
Post a Comment
November 09, 2009
Your review was "spot-on" ! I really enjoyed the movie and saw it twice in the theatre. I thought finally, Star Trek reached down and got a pair! Looking forward to the next installments!
 
September 02, 2009
Great review. When Eric Bana's character travelled back in time (at Kirk's birth) he altered time kind of what happened in Back to the Future and thus created an alternate reality.
 
May 07, 2009
I was able to get Advanced Screening tickets from FYE in philly. There was an add about it in the Philly METRO.
 
May 07, 2009
I guess we're all gonna have to buy bootleg copies now so we can get famous too! =)
 
May 07, 2009
Wow, I send you a big congratualtions on this excellent review and it's exposure. Out of curiosity, how did you manage to get a sneak preview so early in the week? :)
 
May 07, 2009
much agreed withvthe review!! :)
 
May 07, 2009
Nice write up. I know, but I don't know......Perfect!
 
May 07, 2009
I'm going into Pon Farr in anticipation for this movie! How's that for a reference?!?
 
May 06, 2009
Julian... This review is getting a lot play... nice work. Did you see The Huffington Post reference it today?? at the bottom they link directly to your review. http://bit.ly/17b4SE Very cool stuff.
 
May 06, 2009
are you out of your Vulcan mind... still laughing. i'm using that all weekend and i will try to footnote you when i can. great title... even better review.
 
1 2 Next
More Star Trek (2009) reviews
review by . March 23, 2013
What was your first impression? Very negative        Plot summary? A new cast of the characters having the same name is introduced with a new storyline. Kirk and Spock forge a friendship under fire.        What's the bottom line?      There are some bad moments that will turn off many long-term Star Trek fans but if that happens, watch it a few more times and concentrate on the relationships between the main characters. 
review by . December 12, 2010
Let's just be clear, I am not a trekkie nor have I ever been a trekkie, and this film did not make me a trekkie, but that didn't stop me from enjoying this reboot of the franchise. The acting was great, the special effects were great, the story was great, and I recently found out that this was the only Star Trek film to win an Oscar (best makeup). It did tend to drag/ be too talky and sometimes hard to follow in some scenes, but for the most part, the movie worked.      …
review by . February 27, 2011
posted in SF Signal
How is it that a film that has been so anticipated, has had so much money and hype devoted to it ends up on the screen with a continuity error in the first half-hour? I refer to the scene in which McCoy is sneaking Kirk onto the shuttle to the Enterprise: Kirk enters the shuttle wearing a red cadet's uniform and then appears on the Enterprise wearing a black uniform. I won't even go into McCoy's breaking the 'do no harm' mantra of the medical profession... Yes, I'm probably …
review by . August 26, 2010
To be honest, I didn't think it could be done. I'm one of those old-time fans. I grew up on episodes of Star Trek in syndication. I cheered the return of the original cast to the movies. I followed closely -- at times more with a sense of loyalty than enthusiasm -- the various series set within the Next Generation, and I even stepped back in time to the early days of Enterprise. But when Hollywood chatter turned to rebooting the saga from the start, placing new actors in the roles of …
review by . December 07, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
I was never a big Star Trek fan.  I had moments where I watched the original and where I watched Next Generation but for the most part I found the series to be well... boring.  Some of it was the science fiction stuff, others was because sometimes it seemed as though Star Trek could never get to the point.  That's not to say I hated Star Trek or couldn't stand it.  There were certain episodes of the original series that I rather enjoyed.  Some parts of …
review by . December 03, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
I’ll get the obvious out of the way immediately:  Were Star Trek (XI) a standalone piece of space-set science fiction entertainment, it would probably be one of the finest to come out off Hollywood in years.  The visuals are stunning, the acting top notch, the Michael Giacchino sound score flawless, and even JJ Abrams’ direction (which is often criticized for being jumpy and dependent upon effects) is quite appropriate.  So why then a very mediocre review score?  …
review by . May 25, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
movie poster
"…To BOLDLY go where No Man had Gone Before.".. …or something like that. The immortal tagline of the operatic TV franchise that had gone on for many generations. First off, let me tell you that I am a casual fan and more of a "Next Generation" kind'a guy, although my favorite Star Trek movie is still "The Wrath of Khan". After the failed box-office outings of recent ‘Star Trek" films ("Nemesis" for one) and the less than dominating …
review by . September 10, 2010
I grew up with "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Since I didn't have cable, I rarely got the chance to watch the original Star Trek series. As I grew older, however, I got to watch TOS and found myself preferring it to TNG. It didn't matter how many new incarnations of Star Trek hit the television or the big screen, so long as no one messed with the original characters and the actors who portrayed them, I was fine. Then comes along J.J. Abrams. I have to admit that I followed the developments of …
review by . May 07, 2009
Honestly speaking, Star Trek is something I had never gotten into, though that slightly changed when an online friend of mine kept posting episode commentaries on the original TV series she was rewatching..     Of course, when I saw the trailer for the new movie in the cinemas, and seeing how amazing Zachary Quinto looked as Spock(I personally love Quinto), I knew it was a movie I had to see. The fact that J.J. Abrams was directing was a bonus.     After watching …
review by . December 01, 2009
Star Trek
It's 2233, and the USS Kelvin is researching a space anomaly. George Kirk (Chris Hemsworth) is left in charge of the ship when Nero (Eric Bana) orders Captain Richard Robau (Faran Tahir) to board his ship. When Robau tells Nero the star date, Nero kills Robau and attacks the USS Kelvin. When Kirk realizes that he cannot save the ship, he orders an evacuation or everyone else. His pregnant wife Winona (Jennifer Morrison) begins to give birth, and asks Kirk what he wants to name his son. Kirk decides …
About the reviewer
Julian Brown ()
Hi, my name is Julian Brown. I currently write for The Brotherly Game, a local Philadelphia soccer website where I cover the US Women's National Team and the local WPS Philadelphia Independence. I … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Husher315
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki


 Star Trek
tells the story of James T. Kirk, Spock and the rest of the Enterprise crew, following their time together at Starfleet Academy as well as their first mission together.

Cast:
  • Chris Pine as James T. Kirk
  • Zachery Quinto as Spock
  • Leonard Nimoy as Spock Prime
  • Bruce Greenwood as Captn. Christopher Pike
  • Karl Urban as Leonard "Bones" McCoy
  • Zoe Saldana as Uhura
  • Simon Pegg as Scotty
  • John Cho as Hikaru Sulu
  • Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov
  • Eric Bana as Nero
  • Ben Cross as Sarek
  • Winona Ryder as Amanda Grayson

J.J. Abrams Star Trek represents the first time in sixteen years since Leonard Nimoy has played the character of Spock.

Originally, Star Trek was slated for a Christmas 2008 release, but it was decided that the film would fair better as a summer blockbuster.  It would also allow for more media coverage as well as more time to work on the films visual effects.

This Film also represents the last time that Majel Barrett Roddenberry played the voice of the Enterprise Computer.  She died shortly after she had finished her work on the film.

J.J. Abrams' 2009 feature film was billed as "not your father'sStar Trek," but your father will probably love it anyway. And what's not to love? It has enough action, emotional impact, humor, and sheer fun for any moviegoer, and Trekkers will enjoy plenty of insider references and a cast that seems ideally suited to portray the characters we know they'll become later. Both a ...
view wiki

Details

Director: J.J. Abrams
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi
Release Date: May 8th 2009
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
DVD Release Date: Unknown
Runtime: 126 minutes
Studio: Paramount Pictures, Bad Robot
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
SF Signal is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists