The Vampire Historians
The Vampire Historians
Lunch community devoted to the study of vampires.
Twilight (movie)

A 2008 film based on the Stephenie Meyer book of the same name, directed by Catherine Hardwicke

< read all 30 reviews

A solid idea and intresting premise can't save this film from being a soul draning experience...

  • Mar 5, 2010

Vampires and humans have been falling in love with each other for years either one falls in love with the human so he can drink her blood whereas the girl is most likely under a trance and does not know of what she is doing.  While those types of stories are interesting they only serve a purpose as a mere plot device to push along the real story of the vicious vampire   trying to   regain power or destroy as many humans as he can. Stephanie Meyers' "Twilight", while interesting in its idea, takes this old tale of the blood feud between vampires and werewolves and romanticize it. I would be lying if I did not tell you that  I was enthralled for the first two halves of this movie  the story of  an introverted  teenage girl named Bella Swan  was interesting for the most part. Watching her  go through her daily routines  and slowly but surely finding  love, which is interesting for the most part  but  this shallow,  and soulless adaptation of the mega popular  books   quickly takes a nose dive  from being ingenious and refreshing. Turning into the titular teenybopper movies of modern cinema.





"Twilight" is a miscalculation on every level the story is good in its own right and the plot of the film about a young girl falling for a vampire is interesting but does not hold your attention long enough for you to enjoy it. It drones along at an agonizingly slow pace setting up the romance that fans of the books know is coming and that non-fans   can see coming from 200 miles away.  It holds it own for the first half but once Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson) makes his appearance onscreen, it quickly turns into an empty, poorly made film that feels more like a T.V. movie than a big screen film.  If the  there was a better director, a better actor and a better screenplay and screenwriter this film could have been the start of a new era of  stylized vampire films instead of a sour  film that leaves you with a bad feeling afterwards. 




Kristen Stewart is good for the most of the film but she is shallow at best it is as if she wants to do more than just read the lines she given but can't. You cannot connect with her character Bella Swan simply because of the way Stewart acts. She makes it impossible to form a bond with Swan because of her mousy voice and shy attitude, which I like in a girl but here it is just shameful.  I've read that is how Swan is suppose to be  Stewart  lowers the bar even further  taking the character to below  the average of the teenage girl  making Bella Swan an  unlikable  and unsympathetic character.  I will say this in her behalf Kirsten Stewart for trying her best, if only for a little while. Robert Pattinson in my book was a complete and utter miscast as the vampire Edward Cullen Pattinson cannot act or hold his own in a film he is a complete and utter eyesore and only there to do nothing more than just please the millions of female fans out there. If he had at least tried to  act in this movie  I would give him a  tip of my hat. Sadly, he did not but I will say this he did try for at least 20 minutes to be professional and then he went right into being just plain awful. The rest of the cast are as emotionless and talentless as the leads they provide no good support except to just stand there and look good.




"Twilight" is entertaining in it's own  way for fans it's there dream come true, for non fans it's a kind of take it as it is type of movie or don't take it at all. How you view, the film is   for you to decide if it is as a shallow heartless exploitation film or as a deeply rich and emotional one, (The latter is more believable).  "Twilight” can entertain you if only for a little while.

A solid idea and intresting premise cause this adaption of the popular books to loose it's bite...

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
March 06, 2010
ha-ha! I'm glad I ran into this review. I didn't like this movie at all, actually I dislike the series' premise so much that I may have fun ripping apart its sequel. Nice work.
March 06, 2010
Thank you very much, I liked this film a little at first then it all went out the window when the romance came into it destroyed it
More Twilight (movie) reviews
review by . April 27, 2009
UPDATE Nov 24, 2009:  For more Twilight fun, check out my list, You might be a Stephenie Meyer Vampire if....      Before I begin, two caveats:      1) SPOILER ALERT:  This review contains spoilers... all over the place.  If you're a 13 year old girl and want to be surprised to find out the really pale super dreamy troubled teenager is actually a vampire... stop reading now.      2) I'm not a 13 year old girl, so  I …
review by . June 26, 2009
The over-priced 2-disc DVD...
     Generally, I’m suspicious of popular trends in entertainment and I avoid exposing myself to any books or movies that I perceive to be conformist, populist, or over-hyped. Most of the time my instincts regarding pop culture are dead on, however there have been some notable exceptions (I was wrong about the Harry Potter novels, which were extremely well-written as well as being successful commercially). But I didn’t expect much when it came to the film adaptation of …
Quick Tip by . March 25, 2011
Interviews with Vampires Trends in the entertainment world are something that we always watch closely. Everyone looks for what the next hottest fashion trend will be. We wait to see which A-list celebrity has a baby and what the new name trends will be. And then we patiently wait for the next greatest thing to come about that will clearly dominate all the markets. Well, the wait is over. The newest greatest thing since pizza bread has finally arrived and it is blowing all of its rivals clear out …
review by . July 19, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
did they even read the book??
i will say this: had i never read the book, i may have liked this movie. but to bad for summit entertainment, i did read the book and so did a WHOLE lot of other people. it was (or at least seemed to be) really low budget. aside from pattington, who had some notable acting experience, the rest of the acting was really bad. some of the minor supporting actors shined brighter than Bella's character as far as acting goes. and the vampire makeup effects were awful. it looked like baby powder mixed …
review by . June 27, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
   The Twilight Books have become popular all on their own.  They've made a huge dent in the literary world (albeit, for all the wrong reasons, but see my reviews for that).  With becoming such mega huge bestsellers, it's no suprise that they opted for a film.  And while my expectations for the film were low heading in, I'm sad to say that they couldn't even fulfill that.  As I kept watching, my only real thought was... how much worse can it get?      …
review by . May 05, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
More than any other movie released last Fall, I so wanted to hate Twilight & actually made a special point to avoid it at all costs. You might even ask what changed my mind or why I'd bothered going at all. Hell, why write a review for the film? Surprisingly, this was actually somewhat better than I thought & somehow I felt compelled to write up a small one for you guys. Hmm. Empty spot in my schedule, right? Ha!      As anyone will tell you, Twilight has been the …
review by . March 23, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
     Being a vampire lore enthusiast, I have seen a very good amount of vampire films. Of course, I would check out this vampire movie based on the best selling book by Stephen Meyer called "Twilight". Please understand that I have not read the book (yet) and obviously this type of movie would attract audiences based on the book's popularity and that this film does know its intended audience--teenage girls or hopeless romantics. I will try to be as objective as I can, I …
review by . July 08, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
did they even read the book??
i will say this: had i never read the book, i may have liked this movie. but to bad for summit entertainment, i did read the book and so did a WHOLE lot of other people. it was (or at least seemed to be) really low budget. aside from pattington, who had some notable acting experience, the rest of the acting was really bad. some of the minor supporting actors shined brighter than Bella's character as far as acting goes. and the vampire makeup effects were awful. it looked like baby powder mixed …
Quick Tip by . October 01, 2010
It was okay. I think I liked the book better though I'm not really sure why.
review by . May 12, 2010
I know this is uber popular but if you go beyond the mush, you get to the utter stupidity.        Seriously, a vampire who's been a dr for many many many more years than most of us have lived and he doesn't think to check the blood level-  umm yeah, I buy that.  But a werewolf with no experience of pregnancy figures that one out.      She has to drink the blood- sure, because there is no such thing as an iv I guess.      …
About the reviewer
C.R. Lopez ()
Ranked #10
Member Since: Nov 6, 2009
Last Login: Jul 7, 2012 09:53 PM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


Twilight is a 2008 American romantic vampire film based on Stephenie Meyer's popular novel of the same name. Directed by Catherine Hardwicke, the film stars Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson. It is the first film in The Twilight Saga film series. This film focuses on the development of the relationship between Bella Swan (a teenage girl) and Edward Cullen (a vampire), and the subsequent efforts of Cullen and his family to keep Swan safe from a coven of evil vampires.

The project was in development for approximately three years at Paramount Pictures, during which time a screen adaptation that differed significantly from the novel was written. Summit Entertainment acquired the rights to the novel after three years of the project's stagnant development. Melissa Rosenberg wrote a new adaptation of the novel shortly before the 2007–2008 Writers Guild of America strike and sought to be faithful to the novel's storyline. Principal photography took 44 days, and completed on May 2, 2008; the film was primarily shot in Oregon.

Twilight was theatrically released on November 21, 2008, grossing over US$392 million worldwide. It was released on DVD March 21, 2009, and became the most purchased DVD of the year. The soundtrack was released on November 4, 2008. Following the film's success, New Moon and Eclipse, the next two novels in the series, were produced as films the following year.
view wiki


Genre: Drama, Fantasy, Romance
Release Date: November 2008
MPAA Rating: PG-13
DVD Release Date: Summit Entertainment (October 27, 2009)
Runtime: 122 minutes
Studio: Summit Entertainment
First to Review
© 2015, LLC All Rights Reserved - Relevant reviews by real people.
The Vampire Historians is part of the Network - Get this on your site
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since