Automobile Enthusia A Lunch Community for the automobile enthusiast. http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia <![CDATA[Honda Fit Quick Tip by jbeswick]]> Fitta", which apparently is the Swedish word for, ahem, the C Word (see http://forbruker.no/bil/article291156.ece). 

Note to brand marketers and creatives: it pays to hire a cunning linguist.]]>
http://www.lunch.com/Awesomeness/reviews/d/UserReview-Honda_Fit-163-1428057-205283.html http://www.lunch.com/Awesomeness/reviews/d/UserReview-Honda_Fit-163-1428057-205283.html Thu, 7 Apr 2011 20:37:55 +0000
<![CDATA[Bugatti Veyron Quick Tip by nalinmello]]> SSC Ultimate Aero TT claimed it in 2007. But recently, people from Bugatti produced a gem, which help them regain the title for the fastest production car in the world.

]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-Bugatti_Veyron-432-1130977-115553.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-Bugatti_Veyron-432-1130977-115553.html Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:32:22 +0000
<![CDATA[Porsche 918 Spyder Quick Tip by TeamAWAC]]> http://www.lunch.com/Sub5Zero/reviews/d/UserReview-Porsche_918_Spyder-11-1440478-81956.html http://www.lunch.com/Sub5Zero/reviews/d/UserReview-Porsche_918_Spyder-11-1440478-81956.html Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:46:20 +0000 <![CDATA[2009 VW Tiguan Wolfsburg 2.0T Quick Tip by theKENnection]]> http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2009_VW_Tiguan_Wolfsburg_2_0T-432-1490474-63813.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2009_VW_Tiguan_Wolfsburg_2_0T-432-1490474-63813.html Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:59:11 +0000 <![CDATA[Audi A3 Quick Tip by Bethany_K]]> http://www.lunch.com/AudiCars/reviews/d/UserReview-Audi_A3-148-1421027-56381.html http://www.lunch.com/AudiCars/reviews/d/UserReview-Audi_A3-148-1421027-56381.html Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:31:37 +0000 <![CDATA[Audi Quick Tip by Bethany_K]]> http://www.lunch.com/AudiCars/reviews/d/UserReview-Audi-148-1010160-56380.html http://www.lunch.com/AudiCars/reviews/d/UserReview-Audi-148-1010160-56380.html Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:23:09 +0000 <![CDATA[Toyota Prius Quick Tip by jrjohnson]]> http://www.lunch.com/reviews/d/UserReview-Toyota_Prius-20-1130919-56224.html http://www.lunch.com/reviews/d/UserReview-Toyota_Prius-20-1130919-56224.html Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:58:08 +0000 <![CDATA[Toyota Prius Quick Tip by IsiandJasmom]]> http://www.lunch.com/reviews/d/UserReview-Toyota_Prius-51-1130919-55842.html http://www.lunch.com/reviews/d/UserReview-Toyota_Prius-51-1130919-55842.html Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:25:57 +0000 <![CDATA[ Nissan Leaf: An Electric Car for the Rest of Us]]> electric cars are neat alternatives for people who want to be environmentally responsible and don't mind keeping fairly close to home, but they do have one significant drawback: they're either gobsmackingly pricey two seat sportsters (Hello, Tesla Roadster!) or larger-than-normal golf carts made just beefy enough for 35 mph-and-under street duty. Not terribly appealing to the majority of American motorists, eh? Thankfully, Nissan has seen fit to create an EV that, aside from being powered by lithium ion batteries driving an electric motor and having a roughly 100 mile range, is a pretty normal front-drive, 5-door, 5-passenger subcompact called the Leaf.

As a purely electric vehicle, the Leaf does without any internal combustion engine, giving it a serious leg up on other green cars like the Honda Insight, the Toyota Prius, Ford Fusion Hybrid and the upcoming Chevy Volt. Granted, there is still a little pollution released somewhere else (the exact amount depends on what kind of power plant the electricity comes from), but if for some reason you want to end it all by locking yourself in the garage with the car running, the Leaf will definitely leave you disappointed (read: alive).

But the Leaf's cleanliness isn't its only calling card; it also has many cutting edge tech toys inside the cabin, like Sirius/XM satellite radio, keyless ignition and Bluetooth connectivity. And speaking of connectivity, you can actually use your iPhone or other smart phone to remotely tell the Leaf to pre-heat or pre-cool the interior, and you can program the Leaf to send you a message when it's done recharging.

So how much will this electrified runabout cost? About $32,000, but that's before a federal tax credit of up to $7,500. Many states will offer further incentives that could bring your net cost very close to $20,000. You'll also be able to lease the Leaf for $349 per month. An optional 220V home charging station, supplied by a company out of my home town called AeroVironment, will run you about $2,200 before tax breaks. (You can charge the Leaf from a 110V wall outlet, but - surprise! - it takes about twice as long.)

Will the Leaf fill everyone's automotive needs? Of course not. But sooner or later, cars that run on electrons and other alternative fuels instead of fermented dinosaurs will be the norm rather than the exception, and if you ask me, the Nissan Leaf seems like it will make that transition quite a bit more bearable.

For more on the  Nissan Leaf, check out the full-length article at sub5zero.com.]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2011_Nissan_Leaf-432-1442459-20456-Nissan_Leaf_An_Electric_Car_for_the_Rest_of_Us.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2011_Nissan_Leaf-432-1442459-20456-Nissan_Leaf_An_Electric_Car_for_the_Rest_of_Us.html Thu, 1 Apr 2010 05:09:44 +0000
<![CDATA[Porsche 918 Spyder Quick Tip by devora]]> http://www.lunch.com/Sub5Zero/reviews/d/UserReview-Porsche_918_Spyder-11-1440478-54780.html http://www.lunch.com/Sub5Zero/reviews/d/UserReview-Porsche_918_Spyder-11-1440478-54780.html Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:27:22 +0000 <![CDATA[ The Porsche 918 Spyder Concept: Automotive Perfection?]]>

It's only a concept car, but every time I think about the Porsche 918 Spyder Concept, the only thought is, "It's the only sports car I'd ever need." And I'm serious. Usually when someone asks what my dream car is, I have an aneurysm. Do I want a fast car? AWD? RWD? V8? Turbo? How many doors? Do I want any practicality at all or just go for the full insanity hyper-car package? 

But this car brings a calm to my mind usually only attained by a bald man chanting on top of a Himalaya. This car satisifies practically every urge and craving I have for an automobile.

The performance of this car is extraordinary. It has a 500hp V8, so it has plenty of power but it will also sound great, which is a prized possession of any good dream car. Now, a Porsche with a 500hp V8 is pretty good, right? Well this car is something special. In addition to to that V8, there are 2 electric motors that put out an additional 218hp. Yes, it's a hybrid. This is what hybrids can-and will-be. This is no Prius, a car so boring they had to add a computer screen showing which way the electricity is going, just to keep you awake. This is a glimpse at the future of hybrids. Hybrids that aren't only for people that talk about shakras, recycled dog poo bags and Al Gore. This is they type of Hyrbid that appeals to everyone. This hybrid will give you 78mpg, but it will also hit 60mph in 3.2 seconds and scream (hum?) all the way up to 198mph.

This is a hybrid for people like me.

You could put this powertrain in an old garbage can and I would probably buy it. 718hp and 78mpg? Sign me up.



But it's not in a garbge can. In fact, it resides in one of the most beautiful Porsches I have ever seen. The design is forward-thinking without being from the Jetsons. It's classic Porsche, without looking like a 911. It's good enough to sit next to a Carrera GT without being called, "the ugly one." It's like a Porsche with some Ferrari sprinkled in it. It's just fantastic looking.

Whether they build this or not (bet you $100000 they do.) what Porsche has done is show us what hybrids can be. They don't have to be designed in a wind tunnel first, with aesthetics as an afterthought. They don't have to be built with tunnel-vision, looking only at the efficiency of the engine, thinking that's all people care about. This car would draw a crowd of car geeks, gear-heads, moms, dads, hippies, and oil barons.  Everyone can appreciate a beautiful car, but it often comes with a caveat, like, "It's a gorgeous Lamorghini Frederick, but 11mpg is just offensive nowadays." Not with the 918. This car can get on the freeway at the same time as a Honda Insight, and the Insight will be pulling into a gas station first. It's the supercar of the future, that could preserve the future. If I had a car that did 200mph and got 78mpg, I don't think I would need anything else.




http://www.sub5zero.com/green-autos/2010-gen...ug-hybrid-concept-video]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-Porsche_918_Spyder-432-1440478-19418-The_Porsche_918_Spyder_Concept_Automotive.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-Porsche_918_Spyder-432-1440478-19418-The_Porsche_918_Spyder_Concept_Automotive.html Tue, 9 Mar 2010 08:12:10 +0000
<![CDATA[ 2012 Lexus LFA Supercar is a True Anomaly]]> 2012 Lexus LFA were announced. This vehicle is one of the most difficult cars to truly wrap your head around. At $375,000, it's more than any of the base models in lineups from Ferrari and Lamborghini, the first two companies that come to mind when thinking about supercars. It can sprint from 0 to 62 mph in 3.7 seconds, which is not particularly fast among its competition. In fact the $70,000 Nissan GTR can perform the same feat in just 3.5 seconds. And Lexus doesn't exactly have supercar credentials. Their last attempt at a high-performance car was the IS-F, which just didn't make any waves.

Even with its 552 horsepower 4.8-liter V10 I just wasn't sold on this new halo car until I came across the Lexus  LFA at the 2009 SEMA Show in Las Vegas, where it made its US debut. I didn't even need to drive it to know that it was truly special. The car has all of the styling and design cues to let you know that it's a supercar but still fits with the Lexus brand aesthetic somehow. There are scoops, inlets, spoilers and skirting everywhere and yet it just works somehow. The interior is sublime and the cockpit laden with dark carbon fiber along with bright red leather and suede.

So, what is the Lexus LFA all about? For starters, the car tips the scales at only 3,263-pounds, truly lightweight for a luxury sports car. Toyota managed to create the LFA using 65 percent composites and 35 percent aluminum. There is no steel anywhere to be found. Almost all of the components were manufactured in house. Which leads us partially to the answer to the question of why? Why now, why this car? 

Toyota knows that the next generation of cars will need to rely on the use of stronger and lighter exotic materials. And there will need to be plenty of technological breakthroughs along the way. Only 500 Lexus LFAs will be produced, all at a loss, but Toyota will be able to offset a portion of their overall R&D costs while creating a platform that gives them plenty of buzz, a strong showing in the motorsports arena and a very different face then they had before its creation.]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2011_Lexus_LFA-432-1439018-18941-2012_Lexus_LFA_Supercar_is_a_True_Anomaly.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2011_Lexus_LFA-432-1439018-18941-2012_Lexus_LFA_Supercar_is_a_True_Anomaly.html Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:06:40 +0000
<![CDATA[ 2010 BMW 135i; Great as is, amazing potential]]>
Starting at $36,000, the 135i comes with BMW's new and amazing 3.0 liter, twin-turbo inline 6 cylinder. It produces 300hp, and 300ft lbs of tq at an incredibly low 1,450 RPMS. That means the powerband is wide and smooth, making it feel like any powerful naturally aspirated engine, and thus very easy to drive. It has the same DNA as BMW's 3 series, which has been on the Car and Driver Top 10 list for 10 years straight. Better yet, you get that DNA is a package that's much lighter than a 3 series, 3250 lbs to be exact. All of this adds up to a small coupe that costs almost 10 grand less than a base 335i, is almost as fast a $60,000 M3, and has room for 4 inside. Not too shabby.

But what makes this car good, so good it landed at #3 on sub5zero's Top 10 Sports Cars of 2010 Under $50,000 is it's potential. In stock form it's a very fast car, keeping up with BMW's flag-ship sports car (the M3) is a very big deal. But that turboocharged engine comes from the factory with a very conservative tune. It doesn't take much to take this car from sports car to supercar. And that is not an exaggeration. For a few thousand dollars, with simple bolt-ons and engine mapping, 500hp is easily achieved. M3s are merely a warm-up to battling 997 Turbos and Ferrari F430s. And you can do it with a proper trunk and still have room to scare 3 of your friends. Not everyone is open to modifying their cars, but for those that are, the potential of a car has a big influence on what you buy. People are just starting to find out what this motor is capable of. And with a curb weight of only 3,250lbs, it holds just as much promise as a track car.

I'm honestly surprised this car rolled out of the factory as good as it did. I would have thought someone at BMW would have said, "Wait! Wait! Stop that car! We made it too good!" But they didn't. The 1 series is supposed to be an entry-level car, aimed at younger buyers who can't quite afford the 3 series, but want a BMW. Like a free cigarette, it's meant to get you hooked on BMW early. Well mission accomplished. The only problem is that if you buy a 135i, you might like it so much, you never see a reason to buy a more expensive BMW down the line. Fine with me, that's just more money for mods.]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/product/UserReview-2010_BMW_135i-432-1438872-18932-2010_BMW_135i_Great_as_is_amazing_potential.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/product/UserReview-2010_BMW_135i-432-1438872-18932-2010_BMW_135i_Great_as_is_amazing_potential.html Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:37:06 +0000
<![CDATA[ 2010 Honda Civic Si w/ Honda Factory Performance Package]]>
Blending performance and practicality is something all automakers are trying to do nowadays. The term "Sport-tuned suspension" is in ads for minivans and Evos alike, and has lost all meaning. Automakers will drive their newest ginormous people-mover around a cone in the parking lot, just so they can call it "track-tested." I understand why. We the consumer want everything. My perfect car would go 240mph, look like a coupe, carry 5 people, sound like a top fuel drag car and get 50mpg. 

That is, of course, impossible. But automakers are trying to feed our simultaneious appetites, and we have to appreciate that. Honda has been doing this for years now, with the SI model of it's popular econobox; the Civic. A normal Civic is as powerful as a toddler, but the SI models have generally been quick, agile little cars that make your commute a helluva lot more fun without compromising quality or efficiency. 


This year's Civic SI is no different. For $22,000 you get a well-equipped 4-door sedan, with loads of creature comforts and a 200hp engine that still returns over 30mpg. It's roomy inside, it will still run long after your turtle dies, and the materials-on the touch points at least- feel more expensive than they are.

There's only one problem; In 2010 giving your "performance model" 200hp is like sending your kid to buy a new video game with pelts. It's outdated. Right now a base Accord has more power than that. Normal family sedans are creeping toward 300hp as a standard offering, and still return good MPG. Now, for $22,000 a Civic SI is ok. It's the cheapest sport sedan on the market, sitting a few thousand underneath a base WRX or GTI.

But that's very, very close. And the Civic Si I drove had the HFP Package, which stands for Honda Factory Performance. And that package costs an extra $4,900(with dealer install), raising the price to $27,000. Add the Sat/NAV the car had (which is horrible) and I was sitting in a $29,000 Honda CIVIC.

Sure, the HFP pack gave me better suspension, brakes, exhaust and a nice bodykit, but at it's core it still had the same 200hp engine the Civic SI comes with. I'm sorry but spending $29,000 for 200hp, bad NAV, and FWD is a bad decision. For that money you can get a fully loaded Subaru WRX, which has 265hp, tons of torque, and AWD. It's cheaper, faster, safer, more versatile and still gives you 28mpg. The MSP3 or GTI are also better, faster and cheaper choices.

A regular Honda Civic SI is a decent performance sedan. It's handling is crisp, and the acceleration is acceptable. But Honda is been using the same formula for too long, while the rest of the field took the idea and ran with it, passing Honda years ago. If you want a daily driver that can also reward you in the canyons or on a track, your better off shopping down the street.
 

For a detailed review or this car, with more pictures, click here.
 

]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2010_Honda_Civic_SI_with_HFP-432-1439009-18928-2010_Honda_Civic_Si_w_Honda_Factory_Performance.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2010_Honda_Civic_SI_with_HFP-432-1439009-18928-2010_Honda_Civic_Si_w_Honda_Factory_Performance.html Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:29:35 +0000
<![CDATA[ 2011 Toyota FT-86: Start Saving Now]]> So, you like cars, but don't have enough money to buy something from Italy or some Swedish super-car that has 254 letters in it's name. What do you do? Well there's lots of cars available right now to choose from. If you don't mind FWD (front-wheel drive) the Volkswagen GTI is an easy choice, or to save a little money you could get a Honda Civic SI. If you think FWD is awful, which it is for true performance driving, you might consider a basic Subaru Impreza WRX, which gives you 265hp with AWD, a good combination.

But if you want to get the most fun from a car, and learn about driving, RWD is the way to go. And entering the competition next year with be the 2011 Toyota FT-86, and I have already started a piggy bank for it. Here's why: 

Starting at $20,000, it will be one of the cheapest RWD coupes on the market. Subaru and Toyota are teaming up to build the car, meaning it will run until I'm too old to drive. It will have a flat-four 4 cylinder engine, similar to the Impreza, so it will be light and get good gas mileage. If it is offered with a turbo engine (from the WRX probably) it will be the only turbo RWD coupe in that price range. For those of you not keeping up, it will be a very fast, light, RWD coupe that costs about as much as a Honda Civic. If the Civic is the dinosaur, the FT-86 may be the ice age.

It's also a damn fine looking car. I wouldn't put it up against the 8C, but the concept is very slick. It's got an aggressive face, sharp curves and a wedge shape that makes the car look pissed. The interior is still in concept form but it will probably come with NAV, Bluetooth, a stereo, a place to put your latte and some seatbelts. I think that all adds up to a very good package.

And if it's offered with a turbo (it had better be!) the tuning potential will be incredible. Parts will carryover from the WRX market, so reflashes and downpipes will be in the mail the second someone gets their keys. For example, if the car comes with the WRX's current engine, a reflash and turbo-back exhaust will give you over 300hp. That means you have almost as much power as a 370Z, which is twice as expensive.

The FT-86 will have the drivetrain that driver's want, an efficient engine that is powerful in stock form but has huge mod potential, wrapped up in a sexy coupe body. For $20,000, that is a hard combination to beat. The ONLY concern I have is if it turns out nothing like the concept. Yes that's a fairly big concern, but the response to the concept was so positive, you'd have to be a vegetable to change it too much. This car will not only give Toyota it's spine back (sorry Prius, you're as boring as dead air), it will give the driving enthusiast a great option if they're looking for cheap, yet practical, fun. This has "bargain of the year" written all over it. Now go look for change in that couch.

For a full-length article and more pictures on the FT-86, click here: sub5zero.com

]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2011_Toyota_FT_86-432-1438840-18861-2011_Toyota_FT_86_Start_Saving_Now.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2011_Toyota_FT_86-432-1438840-18861-2011_Toyota_FT_86_Start_Saving_Now.html Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:36:04 +0000
<![CDATA[ 2010 Nissan 370Z Convertible Review]]> really fast but are insanely expensive, 4 that look fast but are actually slow, 5 that can actually take a corner and the rest fall somewhere in the middle. Throw in the fact almost all of them are available with a convertible, and you're probably feeling overwhelmed and ready to give up.


Well don't, because what the 2010 370Z Roadster is is the Neapolitan of sports cars. It's fast enough, plenty agile, and looks fantastic whether the top is up or down.

When I heard I was going to be driving the soft-top version of the new 370Z, I will admit I was disappointed. Convertibles usually don't do justice to the original coupe's design, they're noisy they're soft in the corners and pigeons have the option of bombing you and your passenger. Some people are drawn to open-air motoring as if it's some magical fountain of youth. I am not that person. So when I grabbed the keys, I thought I was going to be driving a heavy, ugly car with the moves of a manatee.

I was wrong. This car has so much grip and poise, that even on a racetrack with quick elevation changes-mid-corner mind you-it never missed a step. High speed corners are taken with complete confidence, and body roll could only be measured with a carpenter's level. Strucutural rigidity is usually the biggest comlaint about a soft-top, but you can erase that term from your dictionary. That's because Nissan planned to have a convertible from the start, so they put the right bits in to make sure it drove as good as the coupe and by achieving .94g (a mere .03 less than the coupe) is proof that Nissan did. It just feels planted.

It's also powerful, with a 3.7 liter V6 producing 332hp and 270 ft lbs of torque, it reaches 60 mph in under 5 seconds. That kind of acceleration is on par with far costlier, uglier convertibles. The powerband is high, with power peaking at 7,000RPM, but the thrust feels smooth and endless. You're not waiting for that big push right before redline, the 370Z urges you forward continuously, as if being pulled forward by an electro-magnet. It's also buttery smooth, with zero vibration, more proof of the exceptional build quality. The only complaint I have is the lack of a proper exhaust note. It looks and feels like a sports car, so it should sound like one.

The transmission in the car is a wonderful 6 speed manual that has a great mechanical feel, without feeling clunky or coarse. The throws are short, and I never had a problem finding a gear. It's fitted with Nissan's new Synchro Rev Matching system, enabling perfect throttle-blip downshifts every time. Heel-and-toeing is fun, but this system is so flawless it allows you to give all your attention to the driving at hand, be it hitting an apex or passing a truck. And to keep your "purist" friends happy, a simple button turns the system off. Altogether the drivetrain on this car is perfect for the car.

Nissan must have spent as much time on the interior as they did on the drivetrain, because it's laid out very well. It's a very driver-oriented cabin, with every button you might need inches away, and the ones you need the most often (stereo volume, bluetooth, NAV) mounted right on the steering wheel. The cabin is a mix of leather, Alcantara, feaux aluminum and quality plastic. A center-mounted tachometer reinforces the sporting nature of the car, as do the auxiliary gauges aimed at the driver. There's enough stowage for your gadgets and drinks, and even space behind the trick-looking, well-bolstered seats. The only problem arises when you try to look in the rear-view mirror with the top up. You can see cars behind you, but I wouldn't rely on looking over your shoulder to parallel park. That aside, the interior looks the part and plays it well.


Lastly, there's the view of the car itself. As I said above, I almost always prefer the look of a coupe to a convertible. The 350Z is a perfect example why; it's hideous. What happened is they designed a great coupe, then simply erased the top half of the car, leaving a belt-line as flat and boring as Arizona. This time around, as I said, Nissan planned to build a convertible all along, so the designers figured out how to make a car with no roof look good. And boy did they succeed. The long bulging hood leads back to high rear fenders and a wrap-around trunk. Long hood, short deck, prominent fenders; classic sports car. The metal has been sculpted into a shape filled with flowing lines and sexy curves and is easily one of the best looking drop-tops around.

This car exceeded my expectations, and not just those of a convertible, but of a sports car. For $44,000 it has every option available, a well-equipped, smart-looking interior, plenty of power, and grip that many AWD cars strive to attain. For that money you can only get a bare-bones Porsche Boxster, or a Miata that has have the power and isn't nearly as pretty. With the gorgeous sculpted body and a build quality on par with NASA, and you have one of the best sports cars, hard-top or soft, available today. In fact this car is so good, I would - and I can't believe I'm saying this- pick this over the coupe.

 
For the full test-drive, with specs and more info: 2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster

]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2010_Nissan_370Z_Convertible-432-1438258-18833-2010_Nissan_370Z_Convertible_Review.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-2010_Nissan_370Z_Convertible-432-1438258-18833-2010_Nissan_370Z_Convertible_Review.html Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:40:09 +0000
<![CDATA[ A First-Class Ride]]> Buying a new car can be intimidating, especially when you don’t know much about cars or the process. It’s a big investment and you have to do your homework before making a decision. Two years ago I was in the market for a new car. The possibilities seem endless. I started my research online, milling through websites featuring everything from fantasy to sports cars, convertibles to SUV’s. I have to admit I was stumped. Yes, I wanted a cool car (no minivan, please), but also wanted safety, utility, good gas mileage and something compact enough to function well in a city.   After much research I purchased an Audi A3. It was the best choice I could have made and I couldn’t be happier with my car. Here’s why:

   Great Design:

  • The A3 is a hatchback. You can fold down the back seat and still have plenty of room for ski’s, bikes, a dog, etc. However, the car is still small and compact. This makes parking easy and also allows for decent gas mileage.
  • Two sunroofs allow for a semi-convertible feel in the summer and lots of light in the winter.


I feel in control:

  • The car is low to the ground and hugs the road like a race car. It’s not top heavy like an SUV. I have astonishing control even at high speeds and never feel off balance. This has proven especially useful in the many road trips I take and makes driving much more relaxing. I worry less about heavy winds or drafting from other vehicles or trucks pushing me around on the road.
  • All wheel drive – super important for winters in the Midwest. I don’t worry about sliding off the road.
  • Clear vision. The front window is huge and gives me almost panoramic view. The windows towards the rear are position for a minimal blind spot.
  • The steering wheel is taut. If you move it, the car reacts immediately. This is useful in traffic and when passing other cars.  You don’t feel like you’re fighting the road or the car.
  • Power on Demand. This car has instant acceleration. If I need to move fast, it goes. This definitely secures a sense of confidence.  My A3 is the sports version, so it also has a Sport Setting with Tiptronic controls (paddle shifters) located on the steering wheel. This allows for more speed and control, essentially allows you to control the car manually without grinding the clutch.
  • The A3 comes with an Electronic Stabilization Program which improves the vehicles general stability and helps you maintain control when the car is having problems gripping the road. This helps during acceleration, cornering, and especially evident in inclimate weather conditions like heavy rain, ice or snow.  There is nothing scarier than hydroplaning and this prevents the car from skidding out. 

Maximium comfort:

  • The interior seats are awesome…all leather with adjustable seat warmers.
  • It has a great stereo that includes a radio, tape player and 6 disc CD player. The sound system can also be controlled using the buttons located on the steering wheel.  In other words, the driver is King!
  • Power everything: windows, locks, side mirrors.
  • Cruise control (again great for long trips).
  •  The front and rear windshield wipers react automatically to debris or liquid. If it starts to rain I don’t even have to hit the wiper lever, it comes on for me.
  • It’s BlueTooth enabled- which honestly I never use, but would be helpful for those who talk on their cell phones while driving.
  • Heat:  Dual heat control. Both the driver and passages have their own temperature switches. I love this, because I usually tend to be cold when others are warm. Makes everyone happy.

Cons:

  • The only con I can think of is that the back seats are a bit snug for passengers. The roof of the car tends to be low and this can be a bit uncomfortable for tall men.


    One of the best purchases I've ever made! Highly Recommended!
]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-Audi_A3-432-1421027-14250-A_First_Class_Ride.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/d/UserReview-Audi_A3-432-1421027-14250-A_First_Class_Ride.html Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:15:49 +0000
<![CDATA[ For many people, a great read; for motor racing fans, a "must read"]]>
As Charles McGrath points out in an article about Baime in The New York Times (6/09/09), "The centerpiece of the story is the quest by Henry Ford II, or the Deuce, as he was known, to end Ferrari's string of victories at Le Mans, the 24-hour road race that at the time was probably the world's most dangerous sporting event. He was convinced that Ford's racing success would translate into sales back home in the showroom, but he was also locked in a personal rivalry with the imperious Enzo Ferrari, head of the Italian car company. It took Ford three tries and countless millions, but he finally prevailed when a Ford GT40 Mk II, driven by Bruce McLaren, won at Le Mans in 1966."

Displaying the world-class skills of a cultural anthropologist and of a raconteur, Baime carefully guides his reader through a narrative of increasing tension and apprehension until Chapters 21-23 during which the 24-hour "Grand Prix of Endurance" is run at La Mans on a racetrack described in the Detroit News as "a cornfield airstrip in the jet age. It was built 50 years ago for cars that went 65 mph. Tomorrow [June 18] 55 race cars - some of them capable of 225 mph on the straightaway and all of them over the 130 mph class - will get off at 10 A.M. (Detroit time) and it will be a miracle if no one gets killed. Nobody is fearless. Some of these drivers are scared stiff." The climactic race in 1966 had an especially controversial conclusion, what was widely viewed as an "infamous photo finish" and won "by a technicality." The details are best revealed within the narrative, in context.

Baime provides a riveting account of the competition between Ferrari and Ford and their respective racing programs, competition creating tension that is almost palpable. He also celebrates the almost incomprehensible courage as well as athleticism, skills, and stamina of those who drive the Formula One cars, notably Phil Hill, John Surtees, Walt Hangsden, and especially Ken Miles. In the Epilogue, Baime answers a question most readers have after learning what happened at Le Mans in 1966: "And then what happened?" It would not spoil it for anyone who has yet to read this book to reveal that the major "players" in this compelling human drama were never quite the same again after that race.

For those such as I who have little (if any) interest in automobile racing competition, this is a great read. For those with such interest, it is a "must read."]]>
http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/book/UserReview-Go_Like_Hell_Ford_Ferrari_and_Their_Battle_for_Speed_and_Glory_at_Le_Mans-432-1438960-107802-For_many_people_a_great_read_for_motor_racing.html http://www.lunch.com/automobile_enthusia/reviews/book/UserReview-Go_Like_Hell_Ford_Ferrari_and_Their_Battle_for_Speed_and_Glory_at_Le_Mans-432-1438960-107802-For_many_people_a_great_read_for_motor_racing.html Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:00:00 +0000