seth76
"Tom Cruise & Scientology = Crazy"
What did you think of this review?
Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.
Let's discuss Vanilla Sky. Okay. Maybe I can understand someone's not appreciating it the way I did, because I watch a lot of movies and I really like it when someone does something very daring, and just flat-out leaps out of the mainstream. Why people aren't willing to go to these more unusual places will remain a mystery to me. It's not like the tried and true path is going to disappear in your absense; you can always return to the mundane, no harm done. Watching Vanilla Sky at home with my companion, I noticed that she had become antsy. She wanted it to move along; she wanted to know what it was about. So I had to hit the pause button, and I turned to her and said, "Look. I'm going to go ahead and tell you, or you'll loose complete interest and stop paying attention, and it deserves more than you're giving it. It's a science fiction movie." She then turned her head slowly back to the screen, frowning, wondering if she had missed something. I had to inform her that, no, it doesn't look like it, but it is. She ended up enjoying it, but not as much as I did. Cruise was very credible in that movie, and sympathetic, too.
Then right after he completes that foray into weirdness, he turns around and collaborates with Steven Speilberg for Minority Report, which is not only good sci-fi, but a rip-roaring ride through a fascinatingly futurized citiscape. That is a very good movie, and why it's not talked about more is due almost entirely because Tom Cruise was the star instead of, say, Arnold Schwarznegger.
I like Cruise. I've liked since Born on the 4th of July. I preferred the remake of War of the Worlds to the original, and I thought Cruise evoked a lot of emotions in his passion for his children. When I see Cruise's name attached to a project, I immediately become interested. I do so because he's so rich now -- and take that, you naysayers -- I know he can afford to choose whatever project he wants, according to his own very interesting lights. I didn't like his last Mission: Impossible movie, but his body of work is sprinkled with things I have a high regard for. I've even bought a few of his movies on DVD. My reaction is generally favorable toward him.
And anyone who hasn't seen Valkyrie should put it in their queue.
I especially like him in Magnolia where he plays a deeply troubled, chauvinistic motivational speaker. Other great stuff: JERRY MAGUIRE, Risky Business and Eyes Wideshut
I've always been an advocate of playing your own kind of music, even when nobody else sings along....
It is hard for actors to avoid being typecast, especially when they are trying to jumpstart their careers through exposure by taking most roles that come their way. I think Tom Cruise proved that not only was he good in those similar roles, but he was able to go beyond the boy next door, rebel wanna-be in such films as Interview with a Vampire, Magnolia, and even The Last Samurai.
I also don't agree that his performances in Rain Man and Born on the Fourth of July were less than great. In those films, he showed that he was able to give deeper, more complicated performances than those in such films as Top Gun.
I will say, though, that while many people have jumped on another bandwagon, saying that he somewhat redeemed himself and showed a sense of humor by being in Tropic Thunder, I feel that that performance, if any, was a bit contrived.
It is just unfortunate that until recently when people started seeing his more personal side, Tom Cruise was regarded as one of the most successful, most popular and best actors around. If his acting was so mediocre then, why is it that just recently, when he's had less movies out that I can count on one hand, that his popularity is so low? Obviously it is not a question of his acting ability, but his personal life and unfavorable choices that, unfortunately, the world has been able to scrutinize so much more closely than their own.