|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Art » Reviews » Untitled (Portrait of Ross in L.A.) » User review

A 1991 installation artwork by contemporary minimalist artist Felix Gonzalez-Torres

< read all 1 reviews

Contemporary art as a pile of candy

  • May 1, 2009
  • by
Rating:
+5
 I first glimpsed the installation piece, "Untitled (Portrait of Ross in L.A.)," at the Art Institute a few years ago. In those big, blank galleries full of austere, serious contemporary artworks alluding to death or sex or violence (take your pick), "Untitled" stood out as something different. Secluded in one corner, the installation consisted of an sparkly, colorful pile of wrapped hard candies that you could actually take from ... and, like, eat! Now, this is participatory art.

Like other works in minimalist artist Felix Gonzalez-Torres' ouevre, "Untitled" is created with ordinary, everyday materials that pose questions to the issue of temporality. Over time, all the candies in "Untitled" will get taken. It is meant to be replenished — that is, the museum or the owner of the artwork is responsible for replacing the candies that patrons take. The pile of candy is meant to be maintained at a certain weight: the weight of the eponymous Ross, the artist's boyfriend who died of AIDS in 1991 (the same year as the artwork).

The taking of the candies, its progression from a big, fantastical pile of sweets to a few leftover lonely lozenges in a corner, represents the process that Ross went through from the incurable disease. His body grows thinner and thinner, just as the pile of candy slowly diminishes over time. With  "Untitled (Portrait of Ross in L.A.)," Gonzalez-Torres has essentially replicated the dying process of his  lover, set it up to happen again and again on a continuous loop into eternity (even, as it turns out, past his own death a few years later in 1996).

Every time I look at this piece, I feel very bittersweet. On one hand, it ties together something so innocent and jovial (candy!) with something that's darker and more terrifying (uh, death). There's also the question of participation. If I partake in the candy, then I'm also contributing to the pile's demise. Should I even be indulging my sweet tooth? Another question I wonder is why Gonzalez-Torres chose to name this work after his lover. I always thought that by doing so, he was defining Ross by his death, not so much by his life.

But having said that, I should also mention that whenever I see "Untitled (Portrait of Ross in L.A.)," it's really not that complicated.  What first strikes me is not the eventual diminishing of the pile, but the collective beauty of the  multi-colored candies wrapped in plastic, glistening under the gallery lights. I'll never fail to enjoy a piece of candy. What I'm left with is the sweetness of the sentiment.
Untitled (Portrait of Ross in L.A.)

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
14
Thought-Provoking
7
Fun to Read
4
Well-Organized
1
Post a Comment
July 21, 2009
I think I've seen this at MOMA some years ago. Not knowing the meaning behind it, I just walked away. I am a bit lazy with understanding art. It has to come to me or I don't give it a chance. Next time, I will try to read more about the work rather than just letting it talk to me visually. Thanks!
 
May 01, 2009
I've never heard of this piece before, but my interest peaked when I read that it was a participatory art installation that involved sweets that I can eat!  The story and symbolism behind it is very humbling and bittersweet, though.
 
1
About the reviewer

Ranked #72
I'm a curious foodie, a devout fashion gawker, and an unrepentant print nerd. I work at one of the last mainstream commercial magazines that's still printing.      Other things … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
LingEatsCake
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this artwork

Wiki

Felix Gonzalez-Torres. Untitled (Portrait of Ross in L.A.), 1991, multicolored candies, individually wrapped in cellophane. Variable, ideal weight 175 lbs. The AFt Institute of Chicago, Extended loan from the Howard and Donna Stone Collection. 1, 1999.
view wiki

Tags

Art, Minimalism, Artworks, Contemporary Art, Felix Gonzaleztorres

Details

First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists