Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Coffee » Reviews » Agreeing to Aid » User review

Argreeing to Aid

Stories about organizations or people agreeing on a plan to help others out

< read all 3 reviews

African Union Pledges to Reinforce Somalia Force

  • Jul 27, 2010
  • by
BBC Article:

At a summit in Uganda, they approved a request to send 2,000 more troops to the Somali capital Mogadishu.

Rules of engagement are to be changed to allow the troops to fire first if they are facing imminent attack.

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni had wanted a tougher mandate to "eliminate" the al-Qaeda linked group that allowed forces to go on the offensive.

He told the BBC that AU peacekeepers were "confused" by the current mandate.

"They don't understand what they are doing. So they need a robust answer, a robust incisive answer," he said.

Dozens of people were killed two weeks ago in twin bomb attacks in Uganda's capital, Kampala, which al-Shabab said it had carried out.

Mr Museveni's call for the AU force to be able to go on the offensive against al-Shabab was not taken up by the African Union leaders, but the force will now be able to carry out pre-emptive attacks against the hard-line Islamist insurgents.

The summit also approved requests for new equipment for the force.

Troops from Uganda form a large part of the AU's 6,000-strong peacekeeping mission in Somalia. Burundi is the only other country to contribute to the force, known as Amisom.

BBC East Africa correspondent Will Ross says the extra 2,000 troops are likely to come from Guinea and Djibouti - as previously announced - but precise numbers and dates for their deployment remain unclear.

Before the Kampala summit, Somalia's embattled UN-backed government had asked for troops from Muslim countries to prevent al-Shabab portraying the AU force as "infidels".

Both Guinea and Djibouti have Muslim majorities.

The government, backed by the AU, controls only a few parts of the capital, Mogadishu, while al-Shabab and its allies run much of southern Somalia.

The African leaders gathered in Kampala amid tight security and a heavy military presence.

They observed a two-minute silence for the victims of the 11 July bomb attacks, which targeted people who were watching the football World Cup final at a Kampala restaurant and a sports ground.

Mr Museveni told AU delegates that "many of the organisers" of the attack had been arrested and their interrogation was "yielding very good information".

In a statement released before the meeting, Mr Museveni said the attacks would worsen al-Shabab's situation.

"These reactionary groups have now committed aggression against our country," the statement said. "We have a right of self-defence. We shall now go for them."

Our correspondent says there is concern that any offensive against al-Shabab could increase the number of civilian deaths and make the AU mission extremely unpopular with the Somali population.

This too stood out to me in my daily news cycle. Somalia has been a troubled country for years now and for at least the past year has been in the news multiple times a week, not to mention making a very high appearance on the failed states index (#1). Therefore, there has been much debate about what plan of action to take, how international forces should intervene-if any- and what would be the consequence of letting Somalia just fail- would their be a new terrorists group in power?

Here the African Union (AU) has somewhat found a middle ground on the course of action they intend to take. They changed the mandate to allow for pre-emptive defense for troops. Although this is a step in itself, seeing the AU, first act and then agree, I do not believe it is enough. Sending more troops will not solve the problem and coincedentially I also came across an Op-ed from the NY Times today that speaks more to the position I hold.  A strategy of “constructive disengagement” — in which the international community would extricate itself from Somali politics, but continue to provide development and humanitarian aid and conduct the occasional special forces raid against the terrorists. 

This option of talking with the enemy does not only make sense on a rational scale, but a monetary one as well. Countries, even teh U.S., cannot afford to keep draining funds towards troops, when it has already proved to be insufficient and in fact, backfired with Ethopian troops raiding and raping instead of protecting.As Bronwyn Bruton (Op-ed piece) points out, the U.S.should reach out to first moderatists within Al Shabab considering that most SOmalias want the extremists out. I can attest to this having a personal friend who is a refugee in Kenya and wants to return home. Considering most of the Somalia population has now been forced to flee their homes and country, there is support within those numbers to kick teh extremists out (and not in a literal sense), but a negotiative one. 

I acknowledge this may not be the most feasible option, but I think all options must be exhausted before more troops are added and violence is escalted even further. 
African Union Pledges to Reinforce Somalia Force

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
More Agreeing to Aid reviews
review by . July 27, 2010
Giving Back to the Roots
I read an article today about a Harlem Church working with an Ethiopian coffee growers.  According to the NY Times, "the Abyssinian Fund, the only nongovernmental organization in Ethiopia formed by an African-American church, the Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem. The Fund plans to pay for specialized training and equipment to help the co-op’s farmers produce a higher-quality product so they can be more competitive on the international coffee market. Once their income has increased, …
review by . July 27, 2010
TIME Article:   It's no secret that the global economy hasn't exactly been a boon to the labor movement. But globalization can be cruelest to the Third World employees it was supposed to raise out of poverty. As developing countries compete for investment from large foreign corporations, they all too often push workers' wages, benefits and rights so low that many of them ought to be called sweatshop nations today instead of banana republics.  Case in point: In January …
About the reviewer
Laura ()
Ranked #308
My name is Laura, I am currently living in D.C. and attend American University. I am originally from Staten Island, NY. I am majoring in International Relations with a focus in Peace and Conflict Resolution. … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since