A film named "Lincoln" spreads specific expectations. The audience needs to be in touch with the man's life, needs to understand him and to get behind his motivations and wishes. When the only thing you get is a film dedicated to one single important event from this man's life, then at least the audience would want a better understanding of why this person pursued this dream of his. When you don't even get a clear picture of that, then my friend, the film finds himself in a blind corner. Spielberg's take on Lincoln is by far his weakest take on anything in the last years. The film is not bad as in it's narrative opening and construction. It has it's qualities, it explores the 13th amendment pretty well and fair, but the problem is it's just about that. And even if Lincoln is at the center of this historical achievement, you don't really feel it. You see it on screen, you see Lincoln talk but what he really says that makes the audience understand his motivations? What does he really do? From where these motivations come from? Why this inner desire to fight against a wave of naysayers? Why did he aged so much in the last few months? What hurts him so much and what brings him joy? These are question that the film does not give answers for.
You see 'Ol Abe smashing his palm in the table few times but even then there's something missing. And the other times you see Lincoln speaking is when he quotes people or segments of literature. Sure, they have their meaning, and they are connected to the problem at hand, but that's not an insight in this man's life. That doesn't offer much clarity in who this man was besides the obvious. It's kinda disappointing, because it takes away from the emotional weight of the film. On top of that, the supporting cast, the people around Lincoln, are better shaped thus they're more relatable and understandable. Lincoln also suffers from being too cold. It's been long since I've seen a Spielberg film that made me feel almost nothing. This man has a gift for teasing the soul and he wasted that here. Even the way it's shot. The framing was good but that blackness covering like seventy percent of the screen all the time gives the film a confusing tone. What am I supposed to get out of this? I felt forced to like it, to feel something about this incredible man that is continuously augmented to a godlike status. The problem is I never understood why, because all I got was a bigger picture of one single event in which our hero had much to say, but was shown in such light that you don't quite realize that. And to put the cherry on top, the ending makes no sense whatsoever. It has nothing to do with the 13th amendment, it has to do with Lincoln alone, and since the film has weak links to Lincoln as a man of state and a human being, then it makes no sense for that ending to happen. You have a whole film dedicated to the 13th amendment and now you want to end it as a biopic? Please... There's an iconic shot of Lincoln at the end walking down the White House corridor. That's where the movie should have ended. 13th amendment? Job done.
Of course this is mainly me releaving my frustration and disappointment with the film. Like I said, the film has value on it's own if only the title was something else. You get a lot of good stuff in here as well. Besides the good narration and the good architecture of that century and decade, I love that John Williams didn't do too much this time avoiding a jump on the melodramatic horse. The music felt more like ambient music which gave the film a beautiful ghostly exposition. Then there's this great gathering of actors giving quality performances. Besides luxurious performances from Sally Field, David Strathairn, and Tommy Lee Jones, there's obviously Daniel Day-Lewis as our beloved Lincoln. He's a master of this craft and this film proves it once again. I'm not even sure what I should say about Daniel Day-Lewis anymore. He's a work of art on it's own. On of my acting idols, and the man I totally respect and understand the most from the world of acting. Either he's a genius or a paint brush on this huge canvas, that's for you to decide. Daniel Day-Lewis gives life to Lincoln as no actor could have done. At the same time, I feel this sorrow. I feel that the film's confusing tone kinda rips you away from it and there's the risk of not fairly judging Daniel's portrayal.
I don't know what Spielberg wanted to do with this film. I doubt he did this just to rank up some more Oscar nominations and possible wins. I don't think I will ever understand it completely. If he tried to tell history through one man's eye here, then I guess the historian in him became a confused story-teller.
President Abraham Lincoln is perhaps one of the most loved, the most admired president in history. Put that together with director Steven Spielberg impressive resume, Daniel-Day Lewis in the title role supported by a stellar cast headed by Sally Field and Tommy Lee Jones, 2012’s “Lincoln” would obviously be a winner. Well, the film is indeed all that may have been promised and more. The timing of the film’s release was set to coincide with the 150th anniversary of the Emanticipation … more
This movie had a lot of good individual parts: a really good cast, a great director, and a National icon. However, in sum this movie didn't live up to what it could be. The story focuses on the end of the Civil War and Lincoln's push to get the 13th Ammendment through the House of Representatives. Lincoln talks about how he used the powers granted to him because of the war, to pass the Emancipation Proclamation, freeing the slaves. He gives a difficut explanation … more
Two Jews On Lincoln twojewsonfilm·205 videos 35 views By Joan Alperin Schwartz Okay I know what some of you may be thinking...A film about Abraham Lincoln...Boring!!! Let me assure you it's anything but...boring. Steven Spielberg has directed a riverting, intense, exciting, fascinating film about the President of the U. S. that put everything on the line, to pass the 13th amendent to the constitution, which … more
The movie examines Abraham Lincoln's (Daniel Day-Lewis) efforts to pass the 13th Amendment in the last few months of his life. It is a detailed account of his strategy and the negotiations of the members of his cabinet, especially his Secretary of State, William Seward (David Strathairn). The story deals with the minute details involved in making slavery illegal; conversations between pompous politicians are endless and dry and I found it boring. I would have preferred … more