|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Music » Reviews » St. Anger » User review

St. Anger

Hard Rock & Metal album by Metallica

< read all 2 reviews

Ugly in a good way.

  • Jul 1, 2003
  • by
Rating:
+5
This album is seemingly technically deficient on nearly all levels. The musicianship is almost simplistically nasty: no epic riffs or catchy guitar harmonies. The train-wreck drum engineering is aggressively annoying to nearly everybody, and Lars drumming itself is simple-as-usual. The overall sound quality sounds far below the standard of a band with great resources to lavish their recordings.

And yet that is exactly how _St. Anger_ has to be. This album is pure and heavy and the band is completely tight. The _St. Anger_ experience to me is in its urgent rawness. The gutter production makes the album a strangely intimate experience -- the blurry walls of heavy guitar and crude thunder of the drums *enhance* the album's credence. Hetfield's vocals are unrefined, bloody and cracked and all the while very convincing. Metallica's accomplishment here is seen in their marriage of the dirty sound with the *perfect* songs to go with them -- the end result of these two elements enhancing each other at the same time is why the album is good. And befitting to James Hetfield's reputation, there's some pretty huge riffs on this album (not LOTS, but if you make the mistake of listening to this album and saying, "Hey, where are all the legendary riffs like MOP????", you haven't been listening and missed the point).

The media hype about _St. Anger_ being a return to Metallica's thrash roots was often misleading and sometimes pretty asinine. This is heavy and fast, yes. However, it sounds nothing like anything Metallica did before the Black album. The songs are usually long (6-8 minutes) but not really "epic." There are no solos -- they would have just taken away from the sweeping immediacy of the album. Heck, it doesn't sound much like anything they've done ever. The purpose and feel seems different, not to mention the sound.

Some have said this is "nu-Metallica", likening the sound of _St. Anger_ to all the dreadful nu-metal bands. I disagree: nu-metal bands, with their musical recipe of incompetence and banality, are too clean and polished and phony -- inarticulate musical diarrhea no better than "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star." The Metallica of _St. Anger_, on the other hand, is brutish and ugly with an authentic pathos, achieving the sound nu-metal may have been seeking originally before veering horribly off course. Plus, Metallica has pretty mean chops.

The DVD (where you can watch the band play every song on the album live in the studio) is awesome and I wish every band would include such things. And it's funny to see how out of shape Lars is and new bassist Rob Trujillo (please don't beat me up if I spelled the name incorrectly) has some funky moves. Hetfield's vocals, for the most part, take a pretty bad dive, but eh.

Honestly I think this is a pretty great album.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
0
Thought-Provoking
0
Fun to Read
0
Well-Organized
0
Post a Comment
More St. Anger reviews
review by . June 16, 2003
posted in Music Matters
I'm amazed at the many unhappy reviews here. To me, this is some of Metallica's BEST work. It isn't as commercial as the stuff on Load and Reload, which is both good and bad. However, it isn't as grindingly monotonous as some of their older material. It has a sound that nicely melds their gut churning, hard sound with some of the melodic flavorings that groups like System of a Down feature. I wouldn't suggest they are "stealing" those influences, but they have certainly been influenced. However, …
About the reviewer
Clayton Reeder ()
Ranked #442
Rogue capitalist in search of all that is interesting, weird, or beautiful.      Collected here are my hundreds of reviews from Amazon.com, covering mostly music that is offensive … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
lordchimp253
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this topic

Wiki

Never underestimate the regenerative powers of Metallica. Following the stripped-downLoadandRe-Load, they've returned to the raw, vitriolic savagery of their earlier canon, using 1984'sRide the Lightningas a template forSt. Anger. The title track provides the psychic lynchpin of the album by combining the bombast and defiance of the band's earliest high-water marks with more deliberate lyrics and emotional nakedness. Equally cathartic is "Some Kind of Monster," a lumbering beast of a song that declares, "This is the voice of silence no more." Despite that claim, there's an economy to these lyrics; James Hetfield's raw-toothed growl only occasionally punctuates the menacing soundscapes. In fact, "Dirty Windows," the standout track here, is a shimmering five-minute instrumental that's free of the baroque trappings that sometimes clutter the Metallica landscape.--Jaan Uhelszki
view wiki

Tags

Details

Label: Elektra, Wea
Artist: Metallica
Release Date: June 5, 2003

First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists