Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » TIME (aka. SHI GAN, Korean film) » User review

U.S. release

Korean Film directed by Kim Ki-Duk

< read all 1 reviews

Korean Director Kim Ki-Duk Asks the Question: Would You Change Your Face to Keep Your Lover?

  • Aug 21, 2009

TIME (aka. Shi gan) is the 2006 offering of acclaimed Korean director Kim Ki-Duk (the Bow, The Isle, Spring Summer Fall Spring, 3-IRON, Samaria). Kim's style of film-making usually involves limited dialogue, allowing silence to express the screenplay by way of unspoken emotional expression. Much of his films involve marginalized worlds or a way of life; he takes his audiences to that world, the main goal is to make us understand how it operates and see certain rules that may apply. In his film; "Time", he tackles the desire for youth and beauty, also the fears of love.

A young and attractive woman named Seh-hee (Ji Yeon Park) is worried that her boyfriend, Ji-woo (Ha Jeong-woo) is growing tired of her. She occasionally observes him looking at other beautiful women. She-hee is a jealous type and always insists that she doesn't excite him anymore during lovemaking. She-hee even goes as far as suggesting that he imagine her as someone else while making love. Seh-hee, takes drastic measures to keep her boyfriend's love. She disappears for a time to undergo extensive plastic surgery; to change her appearance.

Six months pass, and Seh-hee re-introduces herself to her ex-boyfriend as Ji-hee (Seong Hyeon-a, Woman is the Future of Man, the Intimate) and they start a new romance. Now, Ji-hee realizes that Ji-woo hasn't gotten over his former love; Seh-hee. She learns that he is STILL very much in love with her former face. Ji-hee is faced with a terrible dilemma.

scene at beach

Most of Kim Ki-Duk’s films have certain themes that reflect human misery and some vile characters that can prove alienating to some. His films such as “Bad Guy”, “Samaria“, “Address Unknown” and “The Isle” have presented themes that truly go to the depths of sadness. Among his films, “Spring Summer Fall Spring” and “Time” feels a little more light-hearted. Plastic surgery has become an "in" thing in South Korea, so it is no wonder that movies that deal with this current wave (Time, Cinderella) will be made. Unlike many of Kim's films, "TIME" has a lot of dialogue, although there are moments in the film wherein silence is used for expression. There are some subtle symbolisms and potent themes in the screenplay; I think the failure of communication as well as obsession are strongly represented in "Time". The film plays like a ballad, even though the setting is a huge concrete world, the film never failed to entrance me and at times, even bewilder me. The cinematography is great as usual, places are revisited, and photos are memorized but NEVER for a moment did the proceedings felt dull and boring. The cinematography is actually mesmerizing.

I've read that Kim originally refused to play "Time" in Korea, only after an online petition by thousands of fans did he agree to it. The film received a bit of disdain from the Korean people, which further cements Kim's status as an "outcast" director. "TIME" is far from becoming a mainstream drama, but surprisingly, it may contain a bit of sly humor which are absent in his past films. Kim never fleshes out his characters entirely, but one thing no one can deny is that he never fails to engage his audience's brain with cerebral fascination. Kim's style of directing is truly inspired; it retains that symmetrical genius, both in visuals and narration. "Time" may have a bit of a minimalist approach, the use of symbolic themes and metaphors in the sculptures, the proceedings stay grounded and still came to me as a slice of pure human drama than a fable. 

to recognize?
The only thing with Kim’s films is the fact that sometimes, his screenplays may become too cryptic for its own good. I’ve mentioned that there are symbolisms and metaphors aplenty and one significant one is the scene when Seh-Hee wears a mask of her former face in the café. She then leaves to see her former doctor who then asks if she wants to be changed back, and she refuses. When she leaves, she leaves the mask behind, and the plastic surgeon tries it on, and then asks his assistant to try it on. I thought this was a way to bring a certain understanding to one’s issues, how else can we comprehend something without taking a step to understand? The final act is also a head scratcher, but I saw it as something to do with ‘time’ itself. Kim’s films can easily frustrate viewers, but the beauty of it is the freedom to interpret what you have seen. His films does usually make you work, and I love it.

The strong performance of Hyeon-A Seong is the highlight of this film, she succeeds in expressing all the needed emotions in portraying Ji-hee's character. She is excellent in her performance. Ji-woo's character isn't fleshed out as I would have wished. The two appear to be kindred spirits, both are obsessing either with the past and the future. Seh-Hee’s character is undoubtedly better written than Ji-Hee’s which may prove a flaw in its script. The lead characters' motivation in their actions is very much left to our interpretation at times.

"Time" may mark a new direction in Kim's work, only "time" (pun intended) will tell. This film tackles important issues even though it carries a different style to previous films and it is just as cryptic as his previous films, but it is still entertaining and nonetheless challenging. As usual, the climax of the film is left to the audiences' interpretation. "Time" is truly worth a look for fans of Kim Ki-Duk's work.

I have the Korean region-3 anamorphic widescreen release by KD MEDIA while the U.S. release is letterboxed. This is the usual problems with Asian U.S. releases, they tend to lack the Asian transfer quality.
VIDEO/AUDIO: 1.78 anamorphic widescreen. The PQ is exceptional. Bright, radiant colors with strong blacks(when needed). Clean and crisp picture quality. 5.1 Dolby Digital Korean track is sufficient for this film. The sound is clear with the excellent English subs.

movie poster park Ji-Hee Seong Hyeon-a to recognize? scene at beach

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
October 30, 2009
Plastic surgery is certainly a big thing in Korea. I heard some even goes for one b4 a job interview! Seems like it's a man's lack of attention and a woman's lack of confidence that generate the setting for this industry. In any case, the more one tries to hold onto something, the harder it is to hold. A great review indeed although I probably wouldn't be watching the movie now that I've read the review! I love watching a movie without any idea of the details and what it entails. :-)
October 30, 2009
Oh no....sorry if I spoiled it for you. But trust me, there is more to this film than what I described. You made keen observations when you said man's lack of attention and woman's lack of confidence; you have a great skill in observations. I think this movie may be for you because of your potential for reading between the lines. ;-)
August 21, 2009
Is it "Seh-Hee" or "She-Hee"? You use both. That would be a little too much transformation for anyone I think. =)
August 22, 2009
my bad...it's Seh-hee...ha ha!
August 22, 2009
Couldn' t pass up the opportunity to tease you about that one, Woop!
August 22, 2009
LOL! I do appreciate you bringing it to my attention. You know how it is sometimes, you don't see your errors because you wrote the review, and it's like your mind reads it before your eyes can send the data...ha ha!
August 22, 2009
I'm on "Asoka" tonight...wish me luck.
August 22, 2009
I'm the world record holder on typos that survive proofing, I know what you mean. Hang in there and have a good time with ASOKA. I hope you enjoy the anachronistic sound of the music as much as I did.
August 23, 2009
Just saw it last Friday night. I would rate it 3.5 stars, but unfortunately I don't think I have knowledge of its source material to make a good viewpoint. It had quite a few lingering plot holes as to how it left some questions unexplored; mother's death and the two women, and the spread of Buddhism weren't fully fleshed out. Some parts of it were also unnecessary, yet some patches were brilliant. I liked Arya's (?) death sequence, and I thought some parts of the choreography/soundtrack were a little too modern for a period flick (but maybe I'm just not used to it). Time for "Hey Ram"...
August 23, 2009
That's a pretty strong rating coming from you, although maybe the exra half star was to spare my feelings. It was criticized for exactly the points you brought up. But the song and dance sequences are pure Bollywood. JODHAA AKBAR (which I liked ever more) got around the music problems and had a limited number of them too. I think the spread of Buddhism was such a well known thing in its original land that it didn't need to be done in anything other than the afterword and the forward. Most of the choreography though is based on folk dance movements, the music almost always will have a pop sound to it. You may well like HEY RAM more, but I still think ASOKA is far more representative of Bollywod films which is why I wanted you to see it. (Actually though very few of them these days are period pictures. Most of them are modern stories.)
August 23, 2009
I was entertained by "Asoka" which is why I would rate it 3.5, but probably rounded down, I was going to make a draft for a review but I don't feel confident enough to break down its historical signifance and Bollywood style; my friend really liked it though. I'll see if I can re-watch it, because sometimes some movies get better interpreted/better the 2nd time. I will try to check out Jodhaa Akbar and I do have high hopes for HEY RAM. After all, Bollywood is part of Asian Cinema, so what would I be I don't expose myself to something new and even different?
August 23, 2009
It's so completely different in every way from both Japanese, Korean, and Chinese action films you're used to. How did the pacing feel to you? ASOKA was the first Bollywood film stocked in stores like Blockbuster because American audiences in general were able to connect with it better than some of the others at the time. It opened the doors. When you watch HEY RAM, take special note of all the kissing between husband and wife--it turned off a lot of it's native audience, who found it vulgar. There's something you hardly ever see in a Bollywood flick, kissing. There's a lot of very passionate eye contact and nuzzling though. Remember the big deal when Richard Gere grabbed an Indian actress and gave her several kisses on the neck at a public event? People were very offended. He was burned in effigy across the country. You'd think he'd have known better.
August 27, 2009
I will. Thank you for the added details...
About the reviewer
William ()
Ranked #1
Please "Like" Film and Movies and Keep the Economy strong....LOL!!      My Interests: Movies, Anime, History, Martial Arts, Comics, Entertainment,Cooking, Things I don't … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since