|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » 2012 Movies » Reviews » The Bourne Legacy (2012 film) » User review

The Bourne Legacy (2012 film)

A movie directed by Tony Gilroy

< read all 5 reviews

The Superspy Torch Has Been Passed

  • Aug 20, 2012
Rating:
+4
Star Rating:


The Bourne Legacy is a competent and satisfying spy action thriller, although I suspect it will be problematic for those unfamiliar with the first three Bourne films. This fourth chapter isn’t quite the start of a new trilogy, as some of the ads have suggested; the events of the previous installment, The Bourne Ultimatum, are heavily referenced, as are bits and pieces running through all the films, most notably the Treadstone and Blackbriar programs. It’s never fair, having to catch up on ancient history before delving into a new installment, which should always be allowed to stand on its own. Still, if you can get past the intricate details, you may find that the film is engaging. It benefits strongly from the presence of Jeremy Renner, who takes the reins from Matt Damon as the next superspy-gone-rogue, whose name is Aaron Cross. With a fresh character at the helm, the series doesn’t seem so repetitive.
 
Although there is unfinished business with the original trilogy, which were based on novels by the late Robert Ludlum, this film behaves as if the story were staring all over again. This means that it’s less about the plot and more about the craft of a spy thriller; scenarios are manufactured primarily so that Cross can employ his superior skills, not the least of which is his ability to engage in hand-to-hand combat. As the film progresses, the action will only get more elaborate and occur more frequently. It all culminates with a rather spectacular motorcycle chase on the surface streets and highways of Manila, at which point Cross is being pursued relentlessly by both an assassin and the entire police force. Does any of this mean anything? I’m hard pressed to say. But I sure enjoyed watching it. And the fact that the final shot is a boat riding off into the sunset suggests the filmmakers knew to not take the film so seriously.

                                               
                                                 
The film opens with Cross, a specially trained agent for a CIA offshoot called Outcome, roughing it in the snowy wilderness of Alaska. At precise intervals, he takes a dwindling supply of blue and green pills, which are later revealed to enhance mental and physical abilities. His unexpected encounter with another Outcome agent (Oscar Isaac) is cut short when a guided missile destroys the latter’s cabin. He goes into pure survival mode; as he’s being shot at by unmanned fighter planes, he removes a tracking device from under the skin of his stomach and forces a wolf to swallow it. It seems Cross is being hunted, although he doesn’t know why. Fortunately, we in the audience do. Here enters Eric Byer (Edward Norton), a CIA official who has made it his mission to have the remaining Outcome agents assassinated. This comes on the heels of Jason Bourne’s personal quest for the truth, which in turn led to the Treadstone and Blackbriar programs being publically exposed.
 
Meanwhile, we meet Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz), a genetic scientist for Outcome. A series of unforeseen events, kick-started by her trusted colleague’s inexplicable shooting spree, bring Shearing into Cross’ life, the latter saving her life from CIA agents sent to assassinate her. We, of course, are not supposed to question the ease and speed with which Cross is able to make his way from Alaska all the way to Virginia – or perhaps it was Maryland, although I don’t think it matters in the slightest. That’s just how it happens in stories like this. Anyway, after fleeing the scene of a burning house, Shearing tells Cross that it’s possible to make the side effects of his medications permanent. He only needs to be injected with a very specific type of virus. Trouble is, this can only be done at a pill factory in Manila. And so they board a plane for the Philippines, unaware that the CIA is tracking them down.

                                               
                                                 
The Rachel Weisz character is developed on a somewhat more advanced level than the Franka Potente character from the first two Bourne films. Shearing’s profession, for one thing, has some bearing on the plot, which is to say that her actions can actually advance it. And because she understands the science behind the medications Cross has been taken, she does double duty as a provider of exposition. Having said that, her inclusion is still largely out of obligation for a female sidekick. This becomes especially apparent during the final act, at which point the pace dramatically picks up and we’re inundated with stunts and special effects. It’s strongly hinted that she will become his love interest, which should come as a surprise to no one. I have a feeling their relationship will be much less open to interpretation once the next film is released.
 
I sound like I’m complaining, but really, this movie gave me everything I expected and actually wanted. It’s not a great film by any means, and it certainly doesn’t try for anything original as far as spy thrillers are concerned, but it sticks to its established formula well, and the cast was engaging. I don’t think we’re meant to delve too deeply into stories like this; they exist primarily as escapist entertainment, giving us plenty in the way of structure and spectacle but not so much in the way of meaning. I knew The Bourne Legacy was intended to be mindless fun when I saw a shot of Jeremy Renner scaling the walls of a house with the impossible speed and fluidity of Spider-Man. I watch these films convinced that there’s no more mileage for a sequel to cover, and every time I’m proven wrong. This either means these films are genuinely good or I’ve become lazy. I prefer the former explanation.

                                                     

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
3
Thought-Provoking
3
Fun to Read
3
Well-Organized
3
Post a Comment
September 09, 2012
I wanted to love this one, but it just feels a little....well, nothing different. Renner is arguably a better action hero than Damon though. It was a treat to see this one filmed in my native land.
September 16, 2012
You're probably right, although for me, it had been so long since the previous chapter that I was willing to accept it for what it was.
 
1
More The Bourne Legacy (2012 film) reviews
review by . August 03, 2013
posted in Movie Hype
This movie takes place at the same time that the story for The Bourne Ultimatum takes place and I would suggest seeing that film first before seeing this one.  Having said that, we find out that the Treadstone project was but one of many covert operations led by some unnamed branch of the US Government's espionage side.  Another project involves giving operatives meds (it is the explained what they are about but I do not want to put too many spoilers in this) of varying colors.   …
review by . August 14, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Promoted as a sequel but “The Bourne Legacy” actually feels more like a spin-off. I really enjoyed the “Bourne Trilogy” with Matt Damon in the lead role. The first three movies were smart, exciting and action-driven which made full use of the character created by Robert Ludlum. This new movie takes place about the same time as the events of “Bourne Ultimatum” and has a new character in the lead played by Jeremy Renner.      In this sequel, …
Quick Tip by . September 28, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Has Matt Damon given up the Bourne movies? He excelled as Jason Bourne and is a hard act to follow. Bourne Legacy is less of a sequel, and more of a spin off.    Certainly elements of it work very well. Jeremy Renner brings his own brand of intensity to the role, and I like Rachel Weisz as the doctor with whom he goes on the run. I loved the way the scene in her house unfolded with all its twists and turns.    Renner plays a character not named Bourne, but …
Quick Tip by . September 08, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Slooooooooooooow to start and leave audience with no idea what exactly is happening. One could guess but it didn't make it fun for viewers. Can skip 1st hour if you are busy!     Worse, without Matt Damon, I doubt I'll be going for a sequel if they are planning for one!
About the reviewer
Chris Pandolfi ()
Ranked #5
Growing up a shy kid in a quiet suburb of Los Angeles, Chris Pandolfi knows all about the imagination. Pretend games were always the most fun for him, especially on the school playground; he and his … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Chris_Pandolfi
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this topic
First to Review

""Bourne" Unnecessary"
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists