Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » About a Boy (movie) » User review

About a Boy

A 2002 movie directed by Christ Weitz and Paul Weitz.

< read all 4 reviews

If nothing else is handy

  • Mar 27, 2008
Pros: Small twist on an over used plot

Cons: Over used plot

The Bottom Line: Not terrible. And really not much of anything, but it didn't totally suck. If it comes on as you flip through, it's worth watching.

Plot Details: This opinion reveals minor details about the movie''s plot.

About a Boy at first flush seems like a fluff film that isn’t even really a chick-flick. I had it sent because of Toni Collette. I have a list of favorite actors/actresses (more of the female variety usually) and I add their films to my Netflix list pretty much without regard to what it is. I had some pause before adding About a Boy because 1) at first flush it is a fluff film and 2) Hugh Grant is in it. (As an example of something very rare for me, I couldn’t finish Love Actually specifically because of Hugh Grant. So I gritted my metaphorical and real teeth and pushed play.

I didn’t hate it.

I’m ashamed.

Cineastes, I think by and large, are viewed as a pretentious lot. I think this is true of all of us at one time or another (by this I mean everyone, but you can point to cineastes in particular if you like). We eschew the predictable unless there is or are some truly great performances or other compelling reason. One of us going to About a Boy would look about the same as the men who used to go with upturned camel hair collars into the so-called “art films.”

Yes the film is predictable. Yes Hugh Grant is the usual fop. Other than that, the film takes a different tack and it is just different enough to rescue it from any trash bin.

The aptly named Will Freeman (Mr. Grant) lives entirely off the royalties of a schmaltzy Christmas song his father had written decades previously. He does literally nothing. He divides his desultory days into units of 30 minutes so that he can feel that he is doing something. He is a vacuous one-night-stand expert. He realizes, soon and by accident that single women with children are starved for all sorts of attention, so he invents a child and starts wooing just such a woman. In the meantime he meets Marcus (Nicholas Hoult) who is a misfit to the point that event the misfits shun him. Upon returning Marcus home, Will sees that Marcus’s mother Fiona (Ms. Collette) has attempted suicide. Literally for entirely invented reasons, Marcus insinuates himself into Will’s days. This continues on and on in a relatively predictable way throughout the remainder of the film.

The question is whether it is worth the 100 minutes. The answer is a qualified yes. The analysis will explain the reasons for caution.

First, Will narrates his inner thoughts; Marcus narrates his own. I have always considered this to be weak writing and/or acting. Mr. Hoult plays the almost hyper-vigilant never fit in kid which is the butter to this story; Mr. Grant provides the predictable toast for this story. I’ve never been a fan of the “show don’t tell” command given writers (there are far too many decent and great authors who dispense with this rule altogether); however, for movies you have the option of allowing the actors to indicate what is going on without the intrusive narration. One or two voices-overs are fine, but throughout . . .? It is consistent, but that is the best that can be said.

Mr. Hoult plays a poor analog of Haley Joe Osment (interestingly enough, Marcus mentions him in one of Marcus’s early scenes). He, like Mr. Osment is trying either to care for or behave in a way that is un-childlike for their mother (played by Ms. Collette in both films). This is just another piece of “seen it before.” The difference here is that Fiona is not Lynn. Lynn was trying to understand her son where Fiona is lost in deep depression and Marcus is the one doing all the work (not just some as with The Sixth Sense). Despite not having the strength of Mr. Osment, Mr. Hoult does not totally disappoint.

Mr. Grant . . . Fop, I think, was a word waiting for one person to point to; once Hugh Grant started being a fop, the word needed look no further for a poster boy. The oblivious and blinking mostly fool is the same here as in all other movies (minus Impromptu unless my memory fails me there). He is rescued by the performances of those around him.

Even still, it is not a bad feel-good movie. If you can handle a mostly predictable plot, what I think is excessive narration, and Hugh Grant, you won’t be disappointed. I still have to wonder whether you will be more than just mildly entertained.


What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
More About a Boy (movie) reviews
review by . March 29, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
This one of the funnier movies I've seen in a while - and believe me, I've suffered through hundreds of pathetic comedies.About a Boy is really about two boys: Hugh Grant, a rich, lazy heir, and Nicholas Hoult, the son of a suicidal single mom. It has its serious moments, but overall it's a great laugh. I love the way the movie reads into the minds of Grant and Hoult - it adds a whole new layer of comedy, allowing the characters to add sarcasm to the scene without making the movie unrealistic. The …
review by . April 24, 2003
Hugh Grant is one of my favorite film performers. Notice I don't say "actor." He doesn't really act, per se, since he's always riffing on basically the same character...usually with varying degrees of charming, slightly goofy befuddlement (NOTTING HILL, 9 MONTHS) or charm barely concealing nastiness (BRIDGET JONES). In a film such as EXTREME MEASURES, where he played a doctor turned amateur sleuth, he just wasn't convincing.So much of his success lies with his ability to pick roles tailor made for …
review by . January 16, 2003
Just when you think that every Hugh Grant movie is from a template too thinly worn, up pops ABOUT A BOY. With a fine script, excellent direction and supporting cast this is Hugh Grant's finest hour. Yes, he still maintains than British aloof gentleman aura, but here he allows us to see the shallow void of his character and then invites us to explore his self-evaluation and and salvation in getting on the trail of becoming a man with a meaningful life. The cast is excellent - Toni Collette, Rachel …
About the reviewer
Paul Savage ()
Ranked #56
I name and describe everything and classify most things. If 'it' already had a name, the one I just gave it is better.
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


A box-office smash in England,About a Boywent on to charm the world as another fine adaptation (followingHigh Fidelity) of a popular Nick Hornby novel. WhileHigh Fidelitytransplanted its London charm to Chicago, this irresistible comedy was directed by Americans Chris and Paul Weitz (American Pie) with its British pedigree intact. Better yet, Hugh Grant is perfectly cast as Will, a self-absorbed trust-fund slacker who tries to improve his romantic odds by preying on desperate single mothers. His cynical strategy backfires when he recruits the misfit son (Nicholas Hoult) of a suicidal mother (Toni Collette) to pose as his own son, thus proving his parental prowess to his latest single-mom target (Rachel Weisz). The kid has a warming effect on this ultimate cad, and what could have been a sappy tearjerker turns into a subtle, frequently hilarious portrait of familial quirks and elevated self-esteem. From start to finish, it's a genuine treat.--Jeff Shannon
view wiki


Director: Chris Weitz, Paul Weitz
Genre: Comedy
Release Date: May 17, 2002
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Chris Weitz, Paul Weitz
DVD Release Date: January 14, 2003
Runtime: 1hr 40min
Studio: Universal Studios
First to Review

"A Fine Surprise"
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since