|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » Hancock » User review

Hancock (Two-Disc Unrated Edition) (2008)

A movie directed by Peter Berg

< read all 18 reviews

The First Half Isn't So Bad... But the Second Half... What Happened?

  • Sep 2, 2009
Rating:
+2
Hancock takes a daring approach to the Super Hero mythos.  Where as most superheroes are actually quite heroic, doing what it takes to save those in danger and be all around good role models for kids... John Hancock throws all that out the window and instead opts for a surly, mean and careless superhero who has no charisma whatsoever.  Did I mention he's played by The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air? 

Yes, Will Smith plays the drunk, rude and quick to anger superhero.  He has super powers and is essentially the only one of his kind.  When Hancock saves the day, no one is concerned that he's saved lives, they're more concerned about all the property damage and whatnot that's he done.  This is demonstrated in the movies opening moments where he takes a vehicle full of bad guys and leaves the vehicle  on top of a skyscraper.  The damage is shown and he's berated on the news by a whole bunch of people for it. 

This is where Ray Embrey comes in, and he's played by Jason Batemen, who seems to be built specificially for these kind of parts.  He's a PR guy who ifinds himself in trouble.  Specifically he's about to be hit by a train.  That is until Hancock swoops in and saves him by stopping the train.  Of course, no one is concerned about Jason Batement.  Nope, they're pissed off that he destroyed a train.  That poor goddamn train!  Who can blame the crowd?  That train probably had a family.  Lots of cabooses and... you know what, I'll just say it... that really actually doesn't make any damn sense at all!  But the reason why it doesn't actually comes a little later on in the movie. 

Feeling like he's in debt to Hancock, Ray decides to help improve Hancock.  By turning him from a surly mean drunk into a respectable superhero.  When Ray introduces Hancock to the family, his wife, Mary (played by Charlize Theron) is not pleased at the project that the man has taken on.  Ray still persists in helping Hancock anyway.  He tells Hancock that he proabbly shouldn't swear, that he needs a wardrobe, and that he has to be careful with his take offs and landings ("Your landings are your handshake," he says).  First things first, Hancock has to agree to go to jail for all the damage he's caused... and stay there.  Hancock does this, and grudingly so.  The convicts don't like it because they're in jail because of him (but the people still feel worse for the goddamn train he destroyed).  But while Hancock is in jail crime skyrockets because there is no one there to stop it.  So they come to realize they need Hancock.

A situation takes place in which a man named Red Parker has gone to rob a bank with a bunch of other crooks and is holding some hostages.  Hancock is the only one who can stop the situation.  He manages to do so by being a bit more responsible.  HIs landing is soft, he defuses the situation with grace (sort of...) and saves all the hostages.  And he does it without causing too much property damage.  Suddenly everyone loves Hancock and Red Parker is put behind bars.

If only that was where the movie ended.  But if it did you'd realize you were only sitting in the theater for around 45 to 50 minutes (somewhere in there).  If the movie had actually went on this idea of a Superhero who needs to improve his image, that might've made for a good film.  Instead there has to be a secondary plot that explains so much more.  Suddenly it feels as though the film is just stacking things on in order to make sure they have a long enough film.  Ray's wife turns out to have the same powers as Hancock.  "Wow," I thought, "they could make her the villain."  But they don't exactly do that either.  Instead it goes deeper by giving us a sort of backstory on Hancock, a backstory on Mary and constantly stacking more things on that don't make too much sense.  Including a battle between Mary and Hancock in the middle of the streets in which a ton of buildings and property damage occurs but no one complains then.  So let me get this straight... Hancock destroys a train... that's bad.  Hancock and another super woman destroy an entire city block... that's fine.  Granted they're panicking, but no one says anything about it later (or comments that there's another woman out there just like Hancock).

But the worst part is that the Bank Robber... Red, who's only part in the film was to get his hand cut off, suddenly rallies up a bunch of guys in prison and decides to go after him.  It is unknown how they learn of Hancock's unusual weakness (I won't give it away here, but it's ridiculous), but what's more ridiculous is that they try to play Red off as being the main villain, but he hasn't played much of a role in the movie to be worried about being a threat.  In fact, you get the feeling the director just plucked him off the street and said, "You're the bed guy..."  But unlike other villains we see in other films, we don't learn much of anything... he hardly even has a motive or anything like that.  It's a bad thing when you see a Superhero movie and the villain feels tacked on.  I'll admit it, I like to see the villain as much as I enjoy seeing the hero.  A Superhero is only as interesting as his adversaries are.  We like to see Batman do battle with the Joker, for example.  We enjoy seeing Spider-Man battle Dr. Octopus or the Green Goblin.  But we enjoy seeing the villains because they seem diabolical and daring.  Hancock's villain just feels like he was thrown in there so that Hancock could battle someone.  The only real danger is that Hancock is losing his powers for one of the most absurd reasons any Superher could lose his powers.

The first half of the movie was actually pretty good.  If the entire film had been played on this angle of Hancock trying to improve his image as a hero... then it might've actually been "different" for a Superhero movie.  But when it suddenly devolves into being the same basic Superhero film... it doesn't actually do a good job at all.  A tacked on villain, a sloppy backstory for our two super powered people... the second half feels like a mess.  But I guess in order to get a good length they had to do something with it.  

At the very least Will Smith gives a good performance.  So does Jason Batemen.  In fact, much of the cast does a good job... if they're not throwaway characters.  Some of the special effects are also pretty good.  There's hardly much to complain about in terms of the films special effects and cinematography.  Most of the production values are pretty good.  It's the story and script that are fumbled here.

The first half is very good.  In the end, however, the first half is only there to set us up for the disappointing and nonsensical second half.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
6
Thought-Provoking
6
Fun to Read
6
Well-Organized
6
Post a Comment
January 02, 2011
I pretty much agree with you here, but I did like it a tad more than you did. Nice review
 
1
More Hancock reviews
review by . January 22, 2011
Call me crazy, but I just don't think Will Smith is that great an actor. I mean, I like him in movies like this and Men in Black, but I don't like his dramatic roles and I think he's just trying to grub for Oscars. I hated him in the Pursuit of Happyness, I hated him in Seven Pounds, but I love him in this because this is exactly the type of movie he's good at. Hancock is a very good entertaining movie and Will Smith's second best movie (first being Men in Black). It was fairly …
review by . February 20, 2011
Call me crazy, but I just don't think Will Smith is that great an actor. I mean, I like him in movies like this and Men in Black, but I don't like his dramatic roles and I think he's just trying to grub for Oscars. I hated him in the Pursuit of Happyness, I hated him in Seven Pounds, but I love him in this because this is exactly the type of movie he's good at. Hancock is a very good entertaining movie and Will Smith's second best movie (first being Men in Black). It was fairly …
review by . July 13, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
The movie was a good watch and humorous in general. Will Smith was awesome as always, and the other actors were pretty great too. The plot actually felt flowed pretty well, and I really enjoyed the kick plot twist. The wholesome idea of the movie, but the coordination of scenes and progression of events was somewhat hard to follow. Also, the plot about the guys trying to kill hancock was undercut way to much for its significance in the final scene. The camerawork was the horrible. It really was …
Quick Tip by . July 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
A constantly drunk and slovenly superhero was a refreshing take on superhero movies. Will Smith and Charlize Theron both had very strong performances. I personally liked the surprise twist.
Quick Tip by . July 20, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
It's really sad because the first 35 minutes of this film are witty and charming, then it just goes downhill from there with plot twists and, well, just a disaster.
Quick Tip by . July 13, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Hey H'wood: just because Will Smith's movies make money doesn't mean they're any good. Give it a rest.
Quick Tip by . July 10, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
A good non generic super hero movie. I suggest watching it.
review by . January 08, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
Dvd cover
Superman was raised by a kindly couple and taught the decent way to live and respect life. Thor is the God of thunder who was exiled from his home of eternal Asgard to live on Earth as a mortal so that he may learn humility. Spider-man required personal tragedy so he could realize the responsibility of having powers--Batman deals with his tragedy in a very different way, for him he does what he does for vengeance. All comic book "super-heroes" have their stories of the "why's", …
review by . April 12, 2009
Will Smith's jaded superhero vehicle Hancock starts out well enough - albeit with a premise not a million miles away from Pixar's The Incredibles, but the screenplay leaks coherence as it goes on, and by its conclusion has virtually none left.     There was just too much in the plot arc for it to have much hope of hanging together: the plot twists significantly and starts off in quite different directions on more than one occasion, and in its final act where you might expect …
review by . March 07, 2009
  I knew nothing about the storyline in Hancock other than he was a superhero with a seriously bad attitude. I rented it just because we are compelled to watch all the superhero movies.      What I knew was definitely true. Everyone hates him. His first heroic act in the movie began with a little boy shaking him out of his drunken stupor. He then flew off and created millions of dollars in damage.      In spite of the cursing, which there is quite …
About the reviewer
Sean A. Rhodes ()
Ranked #6
I'm a more analytical person. I believe that the purpose of the review is not for me to give you my opinion but for me to give you an analysis and help you decide if you want to get it. If you reading … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Sean_Rhodes
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie
First to Review

"Super Fixer-Upper"
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists