|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 » User review

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

The second part of the two-part finale to the Harry Potter franchise released in 2011.

< read all 18 reviews

It All Ends...UNDERWHELMINGLY.

  • Jul 17, 2011
Rating:
+2
               


                Okay. I’m going to start with the pre-Potter party details. I bought two tickets to the midnight showing a month in advance. I then went out to buy a Gryffindor tie and scarf the week of and dressed up on Thursday. I even decked out the office with Harry Potter galore, buying themed food, drinks, and decorations. I am a rabid fan. So did I have stratospheric expectations for the final film? No, just exceedingly high expectations. Well, sadly, the film was nothing but exceedingly disappointing.

                To say I was underwhelmed is an understatement. With each passing scene, I could not stop shaking my head at the utter failure to capitalize on the many opportunities to truly deliver on the tagline, “It all ends.” I can certainly understand sacrificing minor details and accuracies for the sake of time and efficiency of story-telling—it would be neither here nor there to be distraught over the exclusion of, say, the extrapolated history between Dumbledore and Grindewald (albeit, I personally would have loved to see even just a clip of a young Dumbledore and Grindewald holding hands or looking into one another’s eyes with endearment). However, what Yates decided to do was completely ignore the grandiosity of scale and epic climax. How many moments of comic relief do we really need throughout the film? Especially when they’re far from humorous or tasteful? I cannot express the sheer feeling of embarrassment I felt when Professor McGonagall said excitedly, “I always wanted to use that spell!” I’m sorry? When has the stern, steadfast, and resolute McGonagall ever diminish to that of a peppy teenager? Moreover, she has never outwardly expressed fear of Snape while he was Headmaster, so for her to be seen with her head down as he is threatening the students and staff in the Great Hall is laughable. Not only were these such poor characterization choices, they weakened the gravity of the entire plot. Another example of character failing was Neville’s reaction to seeing Harry. Nothing but a calmness that would give anyone the impression that Harry had not been gone for months, rumored to be on the run, or else, dead.

                These are just a few of the offensively many characterization flaws wrought throughout the film, but perhaps the most heinous interpretations (throughout all of Yates’ films) are those of Voldemort and Dumbledore. These two characters are the most powerful and awed wizards of all time. The books have never failed to demonstrate with absolute detail and clarity the immensity of their status as such. In essence, both are akin to God and the devil, elevated to a higher sphere without the anthropomorphism. Yet, we are led to believe that both are somehow more human than they really are. The entire point and appeal of their characters is that they’re so powerful and fantastic. But what do we see in the films? Returning back to speaking specifically about this film, we have a progressively weakening Voldemort. If the film were faithful to the book, it would have shown that destroying horcruxes has no direct effect on Voldemort, but we are shown that it does, consequently crippling his power. In fact, it weakens him so much that we are treated to a 10-minute final battle where he is actually dueling Harry. Not only is the idea infinitely absurd, it downright betrays the very nature of Voldemort’s character. There is not a universe that exists in which Harry could possibly duel Voldemort!

                This brings me now to the action sequences in the film. If I thought Yates committed a deafening crime in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince by excluding the final battle in the castle leading up to Dumbledore’s demise, then I was in for a surprise because the lackluster execution of the final dueling and battling scenes swept it from memory. I was shocked that they remembered to include the brief duel between McGonagall and Snape. Unfortunately, they couldn’t even get that right either.

Professor McGonagall moved faster than Harry could have believed. Her wand slashed through the air and for a split second Harry thought that Snape must crumple, unconscious, but the swiftness of his Shield Charm was such that McGonagall was thrown off balance. She brandished her wand at a torch on the wall and it flew out of its bracket…the descending flames, which became a ring of fire that filled the corridor and flew like a lasso at Snape.

Then it was no longer fire, but a great black serpent that McGonagall blasted to smoke, which re-formed and solidified in seconds to become a swarm of pursuing daggers. Snape avoided them only by forcing the suit of armor in front of him, and with echoing clangs the daggers sank, one after another, into its breast.

                Why is it that, when presented with an abundance of detail, Yates constantly ignores gold and offers rusted copper? Did the animators just get lazy? Doubtful. So, instead, we get consecutive fire spells from McGonagall at Snape until he finally retreats.

                One awesome duel averted. Shall we do the same to the final battle with Voldemort? Why, of course. In place of the aforementioned battle between Harry and Voldemort, we could have had McGonagall, Kingsley, and Slughorn dueling Voldemort at the same time, just as it is in the book because, as I said, to believe that Harry alone could duel Voldemort is preposterous. Three of the highest skilled wizards and witches against Voldermort—the spell-casting would have been spectacular. But why enjoy that when we could just watch Harry feebly attempt to thwart Voldemort by dodging, shielding, and being owned?

                Speaking of things we could have enjoyed: the music.  In an interview with Film Music Magazine, Desplat stated that scoring Part 2 is "a great challenge" and that he has "a lot of expectations to fulfill and a great deal of work" ahead of him. So he at least acknowledged the amount of consideration and care expected of him. Though, regretfully, it was worse than his previous score. Not only was the score sparse, it was uninspiring and, at times, sounded quite lazy. The only redeeming facet was the reprise of John Williams’ music, and how incredibly wonderful those few moments were. I actually feel sorry that Desplat’s score had to be punctuated (and thoroughly out-shone) by Williams’ mastery. Oh, if only the past five films could be re-scored. Some might say that Williams’ aesthetic is not appropriate for the later films because of their darker tone and storylines. I would tell those folks to listen to his scores for Minority Report, A.I., War of the Worlds, Memoirs of a Geisha, and, oh yes, Schindler’s List, just to name a few, and tell me again that he would not have written superb music apt for the later films.

                The only praise I can give this film is its treatment of Snape’s memories in the pensieve. This sequence was perhaps the only portion of the film that was almost entirely inclusive of the book’s material to which I attribute its success on screen. If only the same could be said for the rest of the film—imagine how brilliant it would be.

                Part I did well to ramp up tension and drama. Part II did well to waste that tension and drama. The characterization flops, weak music, and pathetic deliverance of action all contributed to the cinematic carcass. Needless to say, the film leaves so, so much to be desired. It certainly ranks as one of the most over-hyped and supremely disappointing films and finales of all time. And I know J.K. Rowling is wishing she could use Avada Kedavra on a certain director. 

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
18
Thought-Provoking
18
Fun to Read
15
Well-Organized
18
Post a Comment
July 25, 2011
It's interesting that you infer that Rowling is or was disappointed with the film and the director. On her website she sites Yates and "Deathly Hallows" as being the high marks of the film series.
July 26, 2011
If a director helped make millions of profit for me, I sure as heck wouldn't criticize or chastise her or him for it, =]
July 26, 2011
She was already the richest woman in Europe. She could buy Yates, so I don't think that's it.
 
July 21, 2011
What a great review. I agree with all your points, especially the poor director and music. I felt very cheated with this movie.
July 21, 2011
Thanks for reading! Perhaps the video games will be more satisfying? =]
 
July 19, 2011
Oooooh, that's disappointing to hear. Great review, though!
July 19, 2011
Thanks!
 
July 18, 2011
wow, maybe I should just wait for it to come on netflix.
July 18, 2011
Neither do I. My qualms with the film are not that it excluded things from the book, but rather it could have been an infinitely better film if it had relied more on the book's material. I never said my favorite scenes were left out. And you're right, the special effects and acting (by the real adults) were spot on. But, I think we've seen how these two aspects alone can't salvage a film from certain disappointment.
 
July 17, 2011
Great review!! I feel your disappointment there. I think as with any other director, Yates had the issue of time constraints, budget and the limitations established by the other films in the series (as with mood and tone); and as with any other book adaptation, it is all left to the visualization of the scripter and the writer. Comic book movies are often watered down to appease the general audience. It appears that this series was the same.

Scripting a movie is very different from scripting a book. In a movie, you have to establish your central focus, then devices and what you need to express to get to the crux of the story. Yates did a good job in maintaining focus...which was Harry and his friends. In a book, you can be as descriptive as you can and allow the reader to interpret it as they wish. Movies tend to express through action and pictures while books are driven by imagination. But I hear yah, I always thought this was a mixed series.

I had my own issues with it, I gave it a 4/5 but I just put it into that "I wasn't its target audience" and I accpeted the movie for what it was intended. For me, this was the best in the series, but not even close to my favorite films list.  Now if I was to direct this movie, then doubtless it wouldn't be for teens and young adults...it'll be so much darker and it may be rated R. Ok, I am rambling....LOL
July 17, 2011
Thanks! The failings I mentioned in my review have little relevance to the preservation of focus in the film. Improving upon them would not be a hindrance to the focus of the protagonists and, in fact, would actually enhance the quality of film altogether.
July 17, 2011
Yeah, I know. I am pretty sure while it would've made the movie more complex and more exciting, some viewers (those who didn't read the books) would've gotten lost since the last two movies are a part of the series, and to show a more careful hand can be a risky change in tone and mood. The thing is, they should've done that approach from the very first movie; I know the movie had issues, it is just that I think Yates did the best he could do to follow the groundwork in the other movies. I dunno if I said that right. How many directors has this series had? I have no idea myself....

Oh, don't get me wrong, Tu, I agree with you 100 %, but sometimes, we get what we get....I do need to write that article why oftentimes adaptations don't work. LOL!
 
1
More Harry Potter and the Deathly H... reviews
review by . July 16, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
The Endgame To The Harry Potter Saga Presents A Bittersweet Close....
For me, the “Harry Potter” movie franchise has been more or less a hit or a miss. I liked its main premise of the introductions of a boy into the world of wizardry that results into the character’s maturity and finally realizing that such a beginning could only end in an epic tale of heroism, of commitment to peace even under the shadow of war. I was never a fan of the “Harry Potter” saga (though I saw each and every movie), and I began to like the franchise after the …
review by . July 17, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
After all these years its finally over, what started out all those years ago with three akward little kids ended with three matured adults. I grew up reading these books, dragging my mom to barnes and noble at midnight to wait in a long line just to get my hands on the newest addition to the series. I was excited when the first movie came out because it was so perfect and closer to the text than the majority of books turned movies are. Around the third film i was starting to loose faith in the movie …
review by . September 28, 2011
posted in Potter Junkies
Not having seen all the Harry Potters I went to see this on opening weekend with friends who updated me on part 1 to bring me up to date.     If you have not seen Deathly Hallows part 1, or the previous Potters here is what you need to know. Harry Potter, young wizard with friends, gets into trouble (again) and uses magic to get out (again). Mortal enemy Voldemort intends to get him and rule the magical world with his evil powers. He must be stopped before it's too late. His …
review by . July 14, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
It All Ends. With little doubt the most appropriate tag line of the franchise. After seven books and eight films the epic series of the boy wizard comes to a glorious end. The people in front and behind the camera know the expectations are high from the fans. With pressure coming from muggles everywhere the cast and crew bring their A game and provide us with a brilliant end to a wonderful series.      In front of a packed theater of Harry Potter faithful, you would expect the …
review by . July 14, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
'Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2' 'Two Jews On Film' One Gives It A Standing 'O' (Video)
         'Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows-Part 2 is the final adventure in the 'Harry Potter' series. The film is directed brilliantly by David Yates and cleverly adapted for the screen by Steve Klos.      This is not only the last film in the franchise, but it is the best.       From the first shot...where we see Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) holding his sword up to the darkened sky, followed …
review by . July 19, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
   The final chapter to this fantasy phenomena served justice to both fans of the series and simple moviegoers. I see a pattern lately with Return of the King, Toy Story 3, Deathly Hallows Part 2 and probably The Dark Knight Rises where the last movies in the franchise might also become the best in the franchise. It's definitely an era where you have people putting a lot of effort into delivering that perfect ending to a story. The Harry Potter movies were always a hit or a miss. There's …
review by . July 16, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Star Rating:         It’s never easy saying goodbye. I can’t say that I grew up with the Harry Potter films – I was eighteen years old when the first was one released – but they have been a part of my life for ten years, and after that amount of time, anyone is libel to grow attached to what they’re used to seeing. Alas, we have reached the end. But I should not make this an elegiac fanboy essay. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part …
review by . July 20, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Well, it's finally over
Part 2 starts at the moment Part 1 ended with Voldemort getting Dumbledore's wand and Harry grieving at Dobby's grave. Still in search of horcruxes, Harry and his pals' journey takes them to Gringott's Bank and finally back to Hogwarts, which is now under Death Eater control and a grim place, indeed.      This movie is exactly like the book, so I knew what to expect and wasn't surprised or disappointed, just not particularly entertained. This director …
review by . July 16, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
It ends but does it end well?
HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART TWO   Written by Steve Kloves   Directed by David Yates   Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman and Ralph Fiennes       Harry Potter: Is this all real or is it just happening in my head?   Professor Albus Dumbledore: Of course it’s all in your head but that doesn’t mean it isn’t real.       As you may or may not already …
review by . July 26, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Swish And Edit! Harry's Farewell Hits And Misses.
   I really enjoyed Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One.  I felt that it was a very nice nod to fans of the book series of HP.  Of all of director David Yates' Potter flicks, Hallows Part One was my favorite.  Part Two, despite being very good, appears to be a bigger nod to fans of the film series instead.      With that stated, I'm not saying that the film is bad.  There are many differences in the book and the film, particularly …
About the reviewer
Tu Nguyen ()
Ranked #113
Member Since: Aug 27, 2010
Last Login: Nov 30, 2012 05:23 PM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
zephyr2050
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 is a 2011 epic fantasy film directed by David Yates and the second of two films based on the novel of the same name by J. K. Rowling. It is the eighth and final installment in the Harry Potter film series, written by Steve Kloves and produced by David Heyman, David Barron and Rowling. The story continues to follow Harry Potter on a quest to find and destroy Lord Voldemort's remaining Horcruxes. The film stars Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter, alongside Rupert Grint and Emma Watson as Harry's best friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. The supporting cast features Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman, Helena Bonham Carter and Maggie Smith.

Principal photography began on 19 February 2009 and was completed on 12 June 2010, with the final day of reshoots taking place on 21 December 2010 marking the series' closure of ten years of filming. Part 2 was released in both 2D and 3D cinemas worldwide on 15 July 2011. It was also screened in IMAX cinemas from the same date.

view wiki

Details

Director: David Yates
Genre: Adventure, Drama, Fantasy
Release Date: July 15, 2011
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Steve Kloves
Runtime: 130 minutes
Studio: Heyday Films, Warner Bros. Pictures
Polls with this movie
First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists