|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Fantasy » Reviews » Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time (2010) » User review

A Fun Desert Romp, But It's No 'Pirates'

  • May 29, 2010
Rating:
+3

Let me be honest. The only real reason I wanted to see Prince of Persia was to see Gemma Arterton in a role with more screen time than her character “Io” in this year’s Clash of the Titans. To my surprise, PoP: The Sands of Time actually had some depth to it… something I wasn’t expecting going into the movie. It should be mentioned that Persia had quite the uphill battle considering its roots in the videogame genre. Historically, videogame movies haven’t exactly garnered the best feedback. Haunting flashbacks of Angelina Jolie in Tomb Raider and Kristin Kreuk in Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li come to immediate memory. Has Jerry Bruckheimer & his Disney-backed studio learned the valuable lesson that it takes more than sexy actresses turned videogame vixens to create a successful videogame-based film? Perhaps, but I can safely say that with Prince of Persia hitting the silver screen this weekend, the niche genre as a whole is on the right track.
 


The movie starts off with a fairly risk-free origin story, one that takes no longer than a couple of minutes to become acquainted with Dastan’s (Jake Gyllenhaal) humble beginnings in the rough and tough streets of ancient Persia. The story then quickly jumps 15 years ahead to Dastan as a young adult prince in the company of his two royally bred brothers and uncle Nizam (Ben Kingsley), brother to the current king of Persia. Viewers are expected to accept the fact that skipping 15 years of character development is harmless to the story’s progression when in fact it may have been the one decision that broke the camel’s back—desert pun intended—for the entire first quarter of the movie. It would have been easier to sympathize with and root for Gyllenhaal’s Dastan had the plot not questionably avoided what seems to be integral points of character growth between his two brothers (the true blood heirs to the throne of Persia), himself, and their scheming uncle Nizam (who wants the kingship for himself). Instead, we’re flash-forwarded to a moment in time just before the epic invasion of the Holy City of Alamut when all the aforementioned family members are discussing battle strategies amongst their trustworthy selves.



Two problems gleam upon the shiny surface of this sword: one is the sketchy assumption that Prince Dastan’s two brothers are completely okay with the fact that their street rat brother has acquired an equal level of royal admiration and military authority to them, and have been for 15 transparent years; two is the mysterious absence of any sort of explanation as to why Alamut is being invaded—the presumption of the presence of illegal weapons doesn’t quite make the convincing cut, and we’re left scrambling to figure out just who the good guys and bad guys are between the two Persian parties. What results is a messy, albeit entertaining, battle sequence in which heroes and enemies accidentally overlap (both visually as well as plotwise) due to the rushed storytelling in the film’s opening sequence. Still, looming undertones of modern-day Iraqi invasion references and potholed plot pacing aside, the movie does manage to provide large doses of Parkour-packed action scenes with no foreseeable shortages of clanging sabers and whizzing arrows in sight. It’s classic popcorn-devouring, high-budget blockbuster goodness peppered with minute traces of humor and charm. What’s not to like, right?
 


The action sequences in particular are a creative joy to watch, but sometimes they feel a bit too fast-paced for their own good, especially in the beginning of the film. You see what’s happening but the movie speeds through the action with a shaky-cam dynamism not unlike the fight and car chase scenes in a Bourne-esque Paul Greengrass flick. While this heightens the sense of excitement, this particular style of shot tends to lose detail in the process and your mind is left to fill in the gaps with your own imagination rather than seeing every motion pan out on screen in front of you. Perhaps the only exceptions are the Parkour scenes, which are a sheer joy to watch as Prince Dastan effortlessly traverses his environment utilizing every ledge and obstacle to his advantage. I’m not the biggest fan of the jitter camera technique (I like to see every bit of action that plays out in an action movie, but that’s personal preference), but I’ll tolerate it in movies that make up for it with visual exhilaration. Fortunately for me, Persia does not disappoint in that respect either. The entire feature is a beautiful display of exotic desert scenery mixed with elaborate character costumes which are undoubtedly a direct result of the movie’s sky-high budget. Sweeping panoramas of a fantastical ancient Persia widen your eyes in wonderment, if only for a few brief seconds before you’re snapped out of the trance via awkwardly glitchy spots of slow-motion that resemble television soap opera flashbacks. Strange.



And then there’s the humor. PoP: The Sands of Time desperately wants to be as witty and charming as any one of the Pirates of the Caribbean films, but falls just short of the ledge. There are moments of tongue-in-cheek comedic timing between Dastan and Princess Tamina (Gemma Arterton) but they never really hit the mark. That’s not to say the writing is off, but you never really buy into the funniness of Gyllenhaal’s character like you do, say, Orlando Bloom’s “Will Turner” in Bruckheimer’s other period adventure. The same shouldn’t be said of Alfred Molina’s character, Sheikh Amar, however. His comedic presence is welcomed with open arms as soon as he appears in the movie, and there’s no awkward timing to his humor to suggest that Molina is anything short of Prince of Persia’s own Johnny “Jack Sparrow” Depp. Gyllenhaal and Arterton could take a few lessons from Sheikh Amar’s witty delivery, but then again, Molina’s comedic success probably has something to do with the fact that his role was precisely written to be comic relief and nothing more.
 


That Persia slows into its own comfortable pace midway into the movie is its saving grace. As soon as director Mike Newell hits the brakes a bit and focuses on steady story-telling rather than getting swept away by ambitions of saga-fueling grandeur, the film finally starts to get good. Its best moments are those that take a slight detour from the main tale: the peculiar Ostrich racing scene, any and all of the palpitating Parkour bits, or the countless situations in which Dastan and Tamina seem to unwillingly avoid their first kiss (to pass that off as romantic chemistry would be a fool's errand; unfortunately, it's M.I.A.). These movie gems combined with Alfred Molina’s charming representation of Sheikh Amar help Persia float along until its epic videogame finale. This is what we waited for, to experience moments that feel like they were stolen straight out of a videogame, situations where your skin crawls as you struggle with Prince Dastan to keep footing atop a flowing sea of sand and rubble. At last it all feels as epic as the trailer suggested, and for a brief moment at the film’s end we are introduced to an adventure that should have tornadoed through like this from the get-go. Had PoP: The Sands of Time not waited till it was too little too late, maybe it would have garnered a higher score. That said, it will sit comfortably in action/adventure mediocrity, but not without its fifteen seconds in the spotlight. For that quarter of a minute, Prince of Persia shines as a movie that will be enjoyed by fans and families for as long as air-conditioned theaters provide refuge from the summer season’s arid heat.

Nizam, Dastan & Tamina, Hooded prince.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
9
Thought-Provoking
9
Fun to Read
9
Well-Organized
9
Post a Comment
June 08, 2010
Thank you! I've gotten mixed reviews from family members on this and had resolved to see it anyway for the eye-candy factor alone. I'm glad that it's got a little more going for it as well. Definitely will see it while its still in theaters.
June 30, 2010
You're welcome; I'm glad my review helped you out in the decision-making process! ;P Did you end up catching it? If so, what did you think... Was I on or off mark?
 
May 29, 2010
wow! Nicely said and well-written review, Kenneth. I am impressed, I have very similar things to say about the film in my own review . (click on the blue text to see it) and we have rated it the same. This wasn't bad and more decent than other video game adaptations as you've said. I will spotlight this in tomorrow's newsletter. Way to make your debut in the community!
May 29, 2010
Thanks, William! I wanted to wait till after I wrote my review to read yours, just so I wouldn't be too influenced. I'm kind of excited to see how our reviews relate in similarity now, so I'll be clicking through. Anyway, thanks for the spotlight; I really appreciate it man! Here's to more movie reviews... *cheers*
June 02, 2010
Glad you're enjoying your stay. Oh, I will be featuring this review tomorrow in the community's homepage (I try to update them everyday) because it had now disappeared from view in the community homepage feed of new reviews.
June 03, 2010
I saw the feature, thanks for that man! ;D
 
1
More Prince of Persia: The Sands of... reviews
review by . November 24, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
They sure had some nice dentists back in Persia
Prince of Persia could be the start of another genre series of high action, special effect laden romps in the some vein as Disney's Pirates of the Caribbean films.  You got old tales of yore, colorful supporting casts, hissable villains and attractive leads in the heroes.  You also got some light entertainment that isn't too demanding of a story to entertain you, maybe it's too light.      A young boy names Datsun is taken in one day by the King of Persia …
review by . January 03, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
*1/2 out of ****      Disney needs to realize two things. One of those things is that they haven't came out with a good swashbuckling actioner since the "Pirates of the Caribbean" trilogy gave up the gun. The other thing they need to realize is that in 2010, the "Clash of the Titans" remake released, rendering the existence of "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time" nearly useless. I'm guessing you know what I mean by all of that: "Clash …
review by . January 22, 2011
We all know the history of videogame-to-movie adaptations, especially those made by the infamous Uwe Boll. Pretty much every single one of them has sucked, except this one. Prince of Persia is definitely the best videogame movie ever made, but that's not saying much, so I tend not to judge it as a videogame movie but instead as a popcorn movie. It definitely succeeded in what it was meant to do also because the few people that were in the theatre looked happy.      In terms …
review by . November 29, 2013
posted in Movie Hype
Before seeing PRINCE OF PERSIA: THE SANDS OF TIME for the first time, I was already somewhat familiar with the general premise of the story because I had played a couple of video games the movie is based upon. The movie follows prince Dastan (Jake Gyllenhall), the adopted son of King Sharaman (Ronald Pickup). In the aftermath of the invasion of an enemy city, Dastan takes a strange dagger filled with sand as spoils of the war and the city's princess Tamina (Gemma Arterton) is captured. Shortly …
review by . May 29, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Action-Adventure In the Sands of CGI Eye Candy!
   Video game to film adaptations. We all know such efforts are always found wanting and video games are hardly ever given the respect they deserve. So why do we still always have high expectations for films that are based on video games? I think it is because of the hope that we may see our favorite video game characters come to life in a credible motion picture. Well, producer Jerry Bruckheimer and his “Pirates of the Caribbean” crew have recruited director Mike Newell to …
review by . June 01, 2010
Long ago in the mystical land of Persia there is a story told of a man, a man who is said to be destined to be a hero, a man would save his kingdom from an evil underhanded force that threatens to undone all that is good. This man is destined to become royalty but he is not born of royal blood this man is destined to become a hero. A hero known as The Prince of Persia "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time" is a visually stunning and grand special effects extravaganza  that  is …
Quick Tip by . November 24, 2010
Far out fantasy in the Middle East where a Prince and Princess keep an artifact out of hands of the evil that is Ben Kingsley. Decent enough and I've sat through worse.
Quick Tip by . December 04, 2010
A film celebrating Persians but played by actors all with British accents? Don't look for ANY historical accuracy here!
Quick Tip by . November 02, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
its got nothing on the game but hey i liked it anyway. the only bad thing about it is it reminds me a little to much of the pirates movies and the national treasure films...but the CGI omg! worth the watch.
Quick Tip by . September 28, 2010
Again a video game-inspired film proves to be entirely predictable and wholly unsatisfying as a piece of storytelling. This being a Jerry Bruckheimer production, I knew that style would overtake substance, but still I hoped that there would be some form of characterization here. Alas, not so much. The plot is mess and fails to explain itself at times while at other times it allows for the characters to make logical jumps that are ludicrous. There are plotholes big enough for an ostrich and a camel …
About the reviewer
Kenneth Arias Azurin ()
Ranked #251
I'm a UCI graduate in my late-twenties working as a marketing ninjaneer while I search for what I believe to be my calling in the advertising business. I aspire to be the best ad copywriter there … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
theKENnection
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

Set in medieval Persia, the story of an adventurous prince who teams up with a rival princess to stop an angry ruler from unleashing a sandstorm that could destroy the world. Which is why after the prince was tricked by a dying Vizier to unleash the Sands of Time that turns out to destroy a kingdom and transforms its populace into ferocious demons. In his effort to save his own kingdom and redeem his fatal mistake, it's up to the prince and the princess to return the sands to the hourglass by using the Dagger of Time, which also gives him a limited control over the flow of time.
view wiki

Details

Director: Mike Newell
Genre: Action, Adventure
Release Date: May 28th, 2010
MPAA Rating: PG-13
DVD Release Date: September 14, 2010
Runtime: 116 minutes
Studio: Walt Disney Pictures, Jerry Bruckheimer Films
First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists