Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

movie poster

Gus Van San'ts 1998 remake of the Hitchcock film.

< read all 2 reviews

A Quick Tip by Butterfly1961

  • Jun 7, 2010
  • by
A lame remake - the original was much better.
Was this helpful?
Post a Comment
October 22, 2010
The original is classic, this was alright.
More Psycho (1998 remake) reviews
review by . August 10, 2009
Psycho was an unnecessary remake of the classic Hitchcock horror film. I don't even have the foggiest idea why the director thought it would be a cool idea to try and remake the original. Not only did he do it ineptly but he did a scene by scene re-shoot of it. Sometimes people just don't know when to either say no to a bad idea or they just don't care. Perhaps it's a little from column A and a little from Column B in this case. One major thing that stands out is how the filmmakers changed the tones …
About the reviewer
Brenda ()
Ranked #70
I love to read mysteries and thrillers; I am addicted to scary psychological thrillers and horror movies; "The Exorcist" and "Silence of the Lambs" being 2 of my favorites. I love … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


1998 remake of the 1960 horror classic.

Cinematography was done by Christopher Doyle.
view wiki


Director: Gus Van Sant
Genre: Horror
Release Date: December 4, 1998
MPAA Rating: R
Screen Writer: Joseph Stefano
Runtime: 105 minutes
Studio: Universal Pictures
First to Review

"Psycho: Redux"
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since