Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » Rise of the Planet of the Apes » User review

Rise of the Planet of the Apes

A 2011 reboot of the popular science fiction film franchise.

< read all 10 reviews

Who Are the Real Animals?

  • Aug 6, 2011
Star Rating:

It’s tempting to judge Rise of the Planet of the Apes on the basis of the several marketing adjectives that have been applied to it. I’ve heard it referred to as a remake, a reboot, a revamp, a reimagining, and a prequel; it may in fact be all those things, but to be perfectly frank, I don’t see how that matters in the slightest. The best way to approach this film, I think, is to judge it on its own terms. And on its own terms, it’s a first-rate science fiction thriller. It’s founded on an engaging premise, it contains several great performances, it employs a wealth of astonishingly realistic creature effects, it depicts action that hasn’t been reduced to the level of goofy macho stunts, and it actually has something to say about broad topics like science, society, the division between man and animal, and tolerance. It exemplifies a healthier attitude in which a movie can be just as stimulating to the mind as it is to the eyes.
To be sure, director Rupert Wyatt and writers Amanda Silver and Rick Jaffa were decent enough to placate fans of the original series with several insider references, not the least of which is the immortal line, “Take your stinking paw off me, you damn dirty ape!” But I warn you: If you spend all your time combing the film for throwbacks, if you spend your allotted two hours to just make comparisons to the old series, you will in all likelihood miss out on what this film and this film alone has to offer. Take, for instance, the casting of James Franco, who, after a miserable turn in the God-awful Your Highness, returns in top form. He plays Will Rodman, a San Francisco scientist dedicated to finding a cure for Alzheimer’s disease. He may have latched onto something with a virus that not only repairs damaged brain cells, but also boosts intelligence. His test subjects have been chimpanzees, most notably a female dubbed Bright Eyes. She meets an unfortunate end, but not before giving birth to a baby boy.

Executive Steve Jacobs (David Oyelowo), who sees Rodman’s research not as legitimate science but merely as a way to turn a profit, orders that all the chimps be put down. Rodman cannot bring himself to kill the baby chimp and instead takes him home. Rodman’s father (John Lithgow), who suffers from Alzheimer’s disease, indirectly names the chimp Caesar. He has clearly inherited his mother’s intelligence, and the older he gets, the faster he learns. He is, for example, capable of speaking sign language by the age of three, and it seems he can understand Rodman just by listening to his voice. By the age of eight, he has become aware that he’s treated differently from the other people in Rodman’s life – more like a pet than a child. As is the case with real life chimps, an increase in size leads to an increase in strength and aggression; after a bad encounter with Rodman’s neighbor, Caesar is forced into a primate facility run by an uncaring man (Brian Cox) and his sadistic son (Tom Felton).
Caesar is given a crash course in the social order of primates, and in no time at all, he uses his intelligence to upset that balance. Now aware of his status as a second-class citizen, he uses his wits to lead an uprising against the human population, one that culminates with a final confrontation on the Golden Gate Bridge. All throughout the film, we’re continuously forced to ponder the riddle of who the real animals are; the battle on the bridge, an action-packed sequence that wisely avoids cheap thrills, only makes it that much harder to solve. Both species have the capacity for heartless brutality, and we see this in no uncertain terms. The obvious argument is that humans are the enemy, for they’re the ones that invaded natural ape habitats and captured and transported them to zoos and laboratories. Yes, but cruelty goes both ways. Would it not send a stronger message to demand justice peacefully?

Short of casting real apes and relying on their trainers for the perfect shot, there aren’t too many ways to bring these creatures to life in the movies. You can build an anamatronic puppet. You can do what they did in the original films and the 2001 remake, namely cast real actors and bury them under makeup. Or you can create them entirely on a computer. To bring the apes to life, Wyatt and his team combined the last two methods; they cast human actors and, through performance capture animation, digitally constructed characters around their movements. The results are uncannily convincing. Caesar in particular benefits from a body performance by Andy Serkis, who, thanks to director Peter Jackson, is no stranger to this kind of filmmaking. His gift for physicality, especially in his face, allows genuine emotions to shine through the pixels. We don’t see a computer generated image, but a creature with feelings.
It’s easy to make films that are entertaining. It’s quite a bit harder to keep audiences entertained while at the same time get them to think. Rise of the Planet of the Apes successfully manages both, making it a rarity amongst action thrillers. If there is anything to complain about, it would be the filmmakers relying too heavily on references to the earlier films; one or two are acceptable, but anything more than that and you’re liable to alienate a sizeable audience. What I responded to wasn’t its association with an old film franchise. Rather, I responded to the intelligent plot, the well-developed characters – especially Serkis’ – and the style with which Wyatt applied to them. Of all the films released during the 2011 summer blockbuster season, this is one of the few worthy of praise.


What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
August 11, 2011
The apes in these shots have  real personalities.
August 10, 2011
I agree about judging it on its own terms. I knew nothing about this particular movie at all when I went into theaters and expected it to follow after the 2001 one, but really soon after, it became apparent that it had nothing to do with that one, or the other ones, so I just sat back and enjoyed it as it is. And it was so good! Thanks for sharing the great review, Chris :)
August 06, 2011
Nice review! I liked this one also, I thought the set ups were cliche and some characters were underdeveloped, but I liked certain areas to its story. It was almost like "if Romero directed an Ape movie" kind of deal....I feel that this one has an unrated cut coming since I felt that some areas were heavily edited and it needed to be longer.
August 07, 2011
I've seen so few Romero movies, so I really wouldn't be able to make that comparison. Regardless, I enjoyed the action, the special effects, and the social critique.
More Rise of the Planet of the Apes reviews
review by . August 06, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Remakes, prequels, re-boots, re-issues and re-imaginings often fall under one creative and narrative flaw. No matter how good a film is or tries to be, it always feels rather predictable. It is rather difficult to really judge the newest injection to the “Planet of Apes” franchise as director Rupert Wyatt tries his hand to re-boot and re-issue the core premise of the classic saga. Originally titled “Caesar and the Rise of the Apes”, “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” …
review by . January 22, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
I was surprised that this is actually a pretty good film and a lot stronger reworking of the original storyline that that Wahlberg film a few years back. James Franco works in a lab and is trying to come up with a cure for Alzheimer's. He experiments on chimps and one shows a lot of promise. When a mistake leads to the chimp being killed and the project shut down, there is a slight wrinkle. The chimp in question was pregnant and was only protecting her newborn.    Franco takes …
review by . August 04, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
'Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes' 'Two Jews On Film' Cheer This SciFi Cautionary Tale (Video)
         What makes 'Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes' so unique is that it's the first live-action film to be told from the point of view of a sentient animal -- A chimpanzee--named Caesar...brilliantly portrayed by Andy Serkis, the world's foremost  performance capture actor.  Andy infuses Caesar with nuance, wisdom and most importantly... heart.        'Rise Of The Planets Of The Apes' …
review by . August 15, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Now that the summer’s coming to a close, a focus is returning to the more idea and character-driven stories that signal the Fall Movie Season. Rise of the Planet of the Apes definitely feels like one of those slower films that works far better when it’s working on constructing an idea than when it’s trying to deliver on blockbuster action film. In the end though it’s still a emotionally dominant and technologically remarkable film that shouldn’t be missed. The film …
review by . September 25, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
      Rise of the Apes (as I like to call this movie because the title is too long and stupid) is probably the best "what-if" movie of the year. The so-called prequel to the original Planet of the Apes surely delivers the expected and probably exceeds our expectations. I wasn't sold at the beginning in Wyatt's talent as a director but now I'm convinced. He managed to reinvent this franchise by giving it exactly what it needs: a good story with a good amount …
review by . August 17, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
12A - 105mins - Action/Drama/Sci-Fi - 11th August 2011   It's been 10 years since the last Planet of the Apes film and looking back, it is fair to say that the years have not treated it too well- the ape costumes are verging on amusing rather than scary. This latest reboot brings us an origins story painting a picture of the beginning of the end for the human race and the start of dominance for the apes on Earth. They have brought back this franchise again with a movie that isn't …
Quick Tip by . August 16, 2011
This is my favorite of the series, by far. The reason: it's the most believable...well, except for Freida Pinto whose character really didn't add anything to the story. James Franco has quickly become one of my favorite actors ever since I saw him in Milk, Howl, 127 Hours and add this one to the list. He does a great job of balancing love for his pseudo-chimp child but, treating him like a pet and the dedicated scientist who is desperate to find a cure for Alzheimers. John Lithgow doesn't get the …
Quick Tip by . September 08, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
the preview pretty much summed up what I saw and it was a way better film than the last planet of the apes and the thought of a sequel to this makes it even better,, def worth a watch
Quick Tip by . August 08, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
This movie was so friggin' cool! Even more cool that it's based in my native San Francisco. I had no idea what to expect, only watching it because I saw positive ratings and because I had liked a previous Planet of the Apes film. This did not disappoint. The visuals are astounding and the plot just makes you think. This is one of those movies that you'll have to catch while it's on the big screen.
About the reviewer
Chris Pandolfi ()
Ranked #5
Growing up a shy kid in a quiet suburb of Los Angeles, Chris Pandolfi knows all about the imagination. Pretend games were always the most fun for him, especially on the school playground; he and his … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie



Director: Rupert Wyatt
Genre: Action, Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Release Date: August 5, 2011
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Pierre Boulle, Rick Jaffa
Studio: 20th Century Fox
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since