|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Science Fiction » Reviews » Star Trek (2009) » User review

Star Trek Poster

J.J. Abrams reboot/prequel to the "Star Trek" film franchise.

< read all 41 reviews

Star Trek - To Infinity and Beyond!

  • Aug 8, 2010
  • by
Rating:
+5
Pros: Everything.

Cons: Only if you're a hardcore Trekkie that will pick everything apart (lighten up will you?).

The Bottom Line: It's a good time.  You should go watch it.  You know you want to.

Plot Details: This opinion reveals no details about the movie''s plot.

Usually I don't feel like I missed out on seeing a movie in theatres.  Sometimes I think, "Darn, that would have been fun to see on the big screen," and then move on with life.

This is not one of those movies.  I totally regret failing to see this on a massive screen with booming surround sound and an empty box of Junior Mints in my fist (since those would get eaten during the previews or at least the first 5 minutes of the movie).

Everyone said it was good.  Everyone said "You should go see it," or "You have to see it," or some variation thereof.  Point being, I should have seen it.

That's because everyone and their grandma was right.  This isn't just some lame-o Star Trek remake and it isn't some brand-spanking new Star Trek with stupid teen actors and excessive language and sex.  Instead, they took a bit of the old, a bit of the new (the good kind of new) and brought them both together in a lovely little symphony of movie making genius and delivered out something shiny and that you (and I) should have seen in theatres.

This, for once, will not be a movie I give a summary for.  I want you to go enjoy the movie and all its little twists and turns and surprises for yourself.  Let it unfold like a wrapped up Christmas package or origami crane.  Okay, so maybe I'm getting too poetic, but trust me, it's just more fun if you go see it without any knowledge beforehand of what you're getting into.  It'll all fall into place easily and you'll have a grand time in the process.

So why's it so great?  First, I give credit to the casting.  I don't know any of these people (okay, maybe like, three) and that's what's so great.  All the original characters that you knew and loved pop up in slightly younger form.  Chris Pine is just right for a young Kirk thrust into a difficult position.  Zachary Quinto as Spock is just on the button.  Zoe Saldana (you may remember her from Avatar) is Uhura, uber-smart, sassy, and with gorgeous hair. Karl Urban (Eomer from Lord of the Rings anyone?) totally surprised me as Leonard "Bones" McCoy and I still can't believe that hair worked on him.  John Cho is Sulu, with his flying abilities and some fencing skills.  Anton Yelchin is Chekov with his crazy-thick accent.  I didn't know any of these people, but now I do.  They passed with flying colors.

And of course you can't leave out Eric Bana as the evil (or is he?) Nero and Bruce Greenwood as Captain Christopher Pike (but what's he not been good in?).

The plotline is fresh, taking a new direction without getting too off course and making a few stops in all the right places.  The visuals are science fiction eye-candy, from planets in dire trouble to battling spacecraft.  All the colors and textures.  Joy.

J.J. Abrams was in charge of this whole party and even if you didn't like LOST, this will still entertain you until the cows come home and long after.  I also credit Abrams for bringing in Michael Giacchino for the soundtrack.  I don't have proof of this, but I recall giving Giacchino plenty of kudos for music in LOST even though it was barely there.  Enough for atmosphere, but he did it so well, that was all they needed.  But give that man a full orchestra with no limits and hoo boy.  Jackpot.

But I do have one gripe with this movie.  It won't affect your viewing in any way, I'm sure, but I just have to say it.  Simon Pegg as Scotty.  Now, no offence to Pegg.  He did a standup job and works in the role and I'm sure everyone enjoyed.  Even I did.  But.  Another man by the name of Paul McGillion was considered for the role, and that he didn't get chosen (with his authentic Scottish accent, by the way, Pegg's is totally fake) drives me up the wall.  They did give him a small part - he's the barracks leader that explains to Kirk why he wasn't assigned to a ship.  That's it.  I think it was to appease all the raving McGillion fans.  However, boys and girls, trust me on this, he would have made a fine, fine Scotty, and that would have made my day to see him get a role he deserves.  I guess a girl can't have everything in a movie.

But hey, it's still a fine movie.  Here's hoping the writers Abrams had can come up with a good sequel.  And extra cookies if you can guess my favorite part.

NT

Recommended:
Yes

Viewing Format: DVD
Video Occasion: Better than Watching TV

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
3
Thought-Provoking
3
Fun to Read
3
Well-Organized
3
Post a Comment
More Star Trek (2009) reviews
review by . March 23, 2013
What was your first impression? Very negative        Plot summary? A new cast of the characters having the same name is introduced with a new storyline. Kirk and Spock forge a friendship under fire.        What's the bottom line?      There are some bad moments that will turn off many long-term Star Trek fans but if that happens, watch it a few more times and concentrate on the relationships between the main characters. 
review by . December 12, 2010
Let's just be clear, I am not a trekkie nor have I ever been a trekkie, and this film did not make me a trekkie, but that didn't stop me from enjoying this reboot of the franchise. The acting was great, the special effects were great, the story was great, and I recently found out that this was the only Star Trek film to win an Oscar (best makeup). It did tend to drag/ be too talky and sometimes hard to follow in some scenes, but for the most part, the movie worked.      …
review by . May 03, 2009
Star Trek Poster
Just as a warning, this review is going to be very spoilerific, so if you hate spoilers don't read this, but I just can't help myself. Now then, may I just say that this might be the BEST Star Trek Film ever?! And that's not comparing it to The Wrath of Khan or First Contact. This Trek film stand alone among all of the other ones. When J.J. Abrams set off to make a Trek film that was accessible to both non-fans and fans, he apparently knew just what he was doing. This film was also an ensemble piece. …
review by . February 27, 2011
posted in SF Signal
How is it that a film that has been so anticipated, has had so much money and hype devoted to it ends up on the screen with a continuity error in the first half-hour? I refer to the scene in which McCoy is sneaking Kirk onto the shuttle to the Enterprise: Kirk enters the shuttle wearing a red cadet's uniform and then appears on the Enterprise wearing a black uniform. I won't even go into McCoy's breaking the 'do no harm' mantra of the medical profession... Yes, I'm probably …
review by . August 26, 2010
To be honest, I didn't think it could be done. I'm one of those old-time fans. I grew up on episodes of Star Trek in syndication. I cheered the return of the original cast to the movies. I followed closely -- at times more with a sense of loyalty than enthusiasm -- the various series set within the Next Generation, and I even stepped back in time to the early days of Enterprise. But when Hollywood chatter turned to rebooting the saga from the start, placing new actors in the roles of …
review by . December 07, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
I was never a big Star Trek fan.  I had moments where I watched the original and where I watched Next Generation but for the most part I found the series to be well... boring.  Some of it was the science fiction stuff, others was because sometimes it seemed as though Star Trek could never get to the point.  That's not to say I hated Star Trek or couldn't stand it.  There were certain episodes of the original series that I rather enjoyed.  Some parts of …
review by . December 03, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
I’ll get the obvious out of the way immediately:  Were Star Trek (XI) a standalone piece of space-set science fiction entertainment, it would probably be one of the finest to come out off Hollywood in years.  The visuals are stunning, the acting top notch, the Michael Giacchino sound score flawless, and even JJ Abrams’ direction (which is often criticized for being jumpy and dependent upon effects) is quite appropriate.  So why then a very mediocre review score?  …
review by . May 25, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
movie poster
"…To BOLDLY go where No Man had Gone Before.".. …or something like that. The immortal tagline of the operatic TV franchise that had gone on for many generations. First off, let me tell you that I am a casual fan and more of a "Next Generation" kind'a guy, although my favorite Star Trek movie is still "The Wrath of Khan". After the failed box-office outings of recent ‘Star Trek" films ("Nemesis" for one) and the less than dominating …
review by . December 02, 2009
Quite Possibly the Best Home Video Release of All Time!
The Blu-ray for J.J. Abram's Star Trek is just plain cool!  There's really no other word to describe it.  What makes Trek on Blu-ray so cool?  Well obviously the movie itself and then the endless amount of awesome special features the second disc has to offer.  There are some people who don't really care for special features, but having watched them all, I can tell you that you're going to want to sit down and watch all of them!  While most DVD and Blu-ray releases come …
review by . September 10, 2010
I grew up with "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Since I didn't have cable, I rarely got the chance to watch the original Star Trek series. As I grew older, however, I got to watch TOS and found myself preferring it to TNG. It didn't matter how many new incarnations of Star Trek hit the television or the big screen, so long as no one messed with the original characters and the actors who portrayed them, I was fine. Then comes along J.J. Abrams. I have to admit that I followed the developments of …
About the reviewer
Nicole ()
Ranked #166
Age: 27 Currently: Freelancing my butt off and querying my other novel, Blood for Wolves. Who likes seriously factured fairy tales? =D      Like books? Then take it from a real, live … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
ssjakira1
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki


 Star Trek
tells the story of James T. Kirk, Spock and the rest of the Enterprise crew, following their time together at Starfleet Academy as well as their first mission together.

Cast:
  • Chris Pine as James T. Kirk
  • Zachery Quinto as Spock
  • Leonard Nimoy as Spock Prime
  • Bruce Greenwood as Captn. Christopher Pike
  • Karl Urban as Leonard "Bones" McCoy
  • Zoe Saldana as Uhura
  • Simon Pegg as Scotty
  • John Cho as Hikaru Sulu
  • Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov
  • Eric Bana as Nero
  • Ben Cross as Sarek
  • Winona Ryder as Amanda Grayson

J.J. Abrams Star Trek represents the first time in sixteen years since Leonard Nimoy has played the character of Spock.

Originally, Star Trek was slated for a Christmas 2008 release, but it was decided that the film would fair better as a summer blockbuster.  It would also allow for more media coverage as well as more time to work on the films visual effects.

This Film also represents the last time that Majel Barrett Roddenberry played the voice of the Enterprise Computer.  She died shortly after she had finished her work on the film.

J.J. Abrams' 2009 feature film was billed as "not your father'sStar Trek," but your father will probably love it anyway. And what's not to love? It has enough action, emotional impact, humor, and sheer fun for any moviegoer, and Trekkers will enjoy plenty of insider references and a cast that seems ideally suited to portray the characters we know they'll become later. Both a ...
view wiki

Details

Director: J.J. Abrams
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi
Release Date: May 8th 2009
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
DVD Release Date: Unknown
Runtime: 126 minutes
Studio: Paramount Pictures, Bad Robot
Polls with this movie
Star Trek Poster

Best Star Trek Movies

by

© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists