|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » Star Trek (2009 film) » User review

Star Trek Poster

J.J. Abrams reboot/prequel to the "Star Trek" film franchise.

< read all 43 reviews

Trek is back!

  • May 20, 2009
  • by
Rating:
+5
I remember vividly the first time I watched Star Trek as a young boy. It was the movie "Generations" and it was utterly bewildering. I had watched "Star Wars" some time before that and in comparison Trek seemed artificial, a bit dull and just plain weird. But the series eventually grew on me with its infectious optimism about the future, its vision of human potential and-for a TV series anyway-its outstanding visual effects. My brother and I would get into bitter arguments over which was cooler, Trek or Wars. I sided with Trek even though I liked both series immensely. Its universe was just so much more complex and suggestive. George Lucas is an immensely talented director but as a writer he leaves much to be desired. Star Trek attracted some of the top science fiction writers of the day to articulate its vision, and as a result instead of just innovative FX and wild alien creatures it also got intriguing, multi-dimensional characters with terrific dramatic possibilities. The original Trek may have brought viewers back to see which new world the starship Enterprise would explore that week. But they also came back to see the unfolding and testing of a remarkable friendship, among characters who could not be more different: the swashbuckling, womanizing yet wise Captain James T. Kirk, the logical Commander Spock and cynical, earthy Leonard 'Bones' McKoy. Their leadership triumvirate, with the balancing out of each other's character flaws and amplification of their mutual strengths, made the series as compelling as it was and led the way for four spin-off series and ten motion pictures.

The movies have always suffered in comparison to the series as well as other cinematic science fiction. With a couple of exceptions (Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek: First Contact) they didn't have the best stories, the characters were under-utilized and the directors couldn't seem to translate a TV vision of the future onto the big screen. The FX, while competent, were never spectacular. After the flop that was "Star Trek: Nemesis" I pretty much gave up and stopped hoping for a truly cinematic Trek experience.

What a marvel it is then that J.J. Abrams has managed to pull together all the elements that made Star Trek so loved-the character interaction, the exotic, optimistic setting-and put them on screen in the grandest possible fashion, with special FX that can genuinely be called cinematic. I'm so pleased to report that the new Trek has got it all: dazzling space cinematography, heart-stopping action, plausible humor, tear-jerking drama and a fascinating storyline which, while in some respects contrived and implausible, serves its primary purpose admirably well: to get the characters we know and love together again, and show how they became the tight-knit crew that we would see in the series.

Indeed, any other faults it might have had as a movie would be forgiven just on the success of its handling of the characters. All the elements fell into place: superb casting, smart dialog and situations which we are familiar with from other Trek episodes (a seemingly no-win scenario, intense personal loss, bravery in the face of certain death) and which distill the essence of these characters to all its primal purity. All the leads are wonders to behold. They do not try to simply imitate the mannerisms of their predecessors (though Karl Urban comes closest with his evocation of DeForrest Kelley's cynical grumpiness) but give fresh, authentic interpretations of them that nevertheless allow you to instantly identify them as their Original Series counterparts (my Dad just watched the movie last night and said he thought that the ghost of William Shatner must have been hovering over Chris Pine's head, so convincing was his performance). Long-time Trek fans will likely get goosebumps as they see old friends brought to life again with such passion and integrity.

And despite the fact that this movie can perfectly well be enjoyed by a complete novice (and judging from the box office and glowing reviews, it has), it really is long-time Trek fans who will get the most out of it. There are so many delightful blink-and-you'll-miss-it moments that mark the first instance of a distinctive mannerism (like Spock's predilection for raising his eyebrow curiously in the face of a challenge) or phrase (McCoy's famous "I'm a doctor not a..." line, Spock's famous "Fascinating" or Scotty's "Cap'n, I'm giving'er all she's got!") that has come to define the Trek experience. The movie is chock-full of trivia, like McCoy's throwaway reference to Nurse Chapel (played by Majel Barrett Roddenberry in the Original Series) or

Of course there are some things that long-time Trek fans won't necessarily like so much. The writers do pull a pretty major stunt to re-start the timeline and give themselves the freedom to tell whatever stories they want to from now on. Many fans were not pleased with how the Enterprise was redesigned (personally I had no problem with it). I'm sure others on this forum will name other pet peeves.

For this long-time fan, though, this movie had it all. It brought beloved characters back to life in a respectful but innovative way, it was true to the spirit of the original Trek in its futuristic optimism and emphasis on bravery and self-sacrifice, it was funny, touching, thrilling and left me panting for more. Trek is back, folks, and hopefully here to stay for many sequels. May it live long and prosper.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
15
Thought-Provoking
5
Fun to Read
8
Well-Organized
4
Post a Comment
July 01, 2009
Great, Great Review!  I loved how much detail you went into, this was a very well organized review!  I liked Urban as Bones the best as well, I thought that he was just brilliant!  You might also enjoy the sequel to Transformers, Revenge of the Fallen.  I also wanted to let you know that you can now Share your reviews on social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook using the Share box at the top of your review.  Again, amazing review :)  
 
May 27, 2009
I wrote a review, too. Good write-up!
 
May 20, 2009
One of the main reasons I always liked the old Star Trek series over Star Wars is that I found Star Wars to be "campy." I guess it was what made it work because the series seemed to lessen the campiness in the newer trilogy and succeeded in being a lot more boring.
May 27, 2009
True to a degree. The TV series, especially Deep Space Nine, was well made, though, especially seasons two and three.
May 27, 2009
Never saw that incarnation of Trek so I can't voice any opinion. One of the reasons that Star Trek was so good was that Roddenbury used alot of Science Fiction writers to either write scripts or to consult on scripts. The Arena episode comes immediately to mind.
 
1
More Star Trek (2009 film) reviews
review by . March 23
What was your first impression? Very negative        Plot summary? A new cast of the characters having the same name is introduced with a new storyline. Kirk and Spock forge a friendship under fire.        What's the bottom line?      There are some bad moments that will turn off many long-term Star Trek fans but if that happens, watch it a few more times and concentrate on the relationships between the main characters. 
review by . December 12, 2010
Let's just be clear, I am not a trekkie nor have I ever been a trekkie, and this film did not make me a trekkie, but that didn't stop me from enjoying this reboot of the franchise. The acting was great, the special effects were great, the story was great, and I recently found out that this was the only Star Trek film to win an Oscar (best makeup). It did tend to drag/ be too talky and sometimes hard to follow in some scenes, but for the most part, the movie worked.      …
review by . May 03, 2009
Star Trek Poster
Just as a warning, this review is going to be very spoilerific, so if you hate spoilers don't read this, but I just can't help myself. Now then, may I just say that this might be the BEST Star Trek Film ever?! And that's not comparing it to The Wrath of Khan or First Contact. This Trek film stand alone among all of the other ones. When J.J. Abrams set off to make a Trek film that was accessible to both non-fans and fans, he apparently knew just what he was doing. This film was also an ensemble piece. …
review by . February 27, 2011
posted in SF Signal
How is it that a film that has been so anticipated, has had so much money and hype devoted to it ends up on the screen with a continuity error in the first half-hour? I refer to the scene in which McCoy is sneaking Kirk onto the shuttle to the Enterprise: Kirk enters the shuttle wearing a red cadet's uniform and then appears on the Enterprise wearing a black uniform. I won't even go into McCoy's breaking the 'do no harm' mantra of the medical profession... Yes, I'm probably …
review by . August 26, 2010
To be honest, I didn't think it could be done. I'm one of those old-time fans. I grew up on episodes of Star Trek in syndication. I cheered the return of the original cast to the movies. I followed closely -- at times more with a sense of loyalty than enthusiasm -- the various series set within the Next Generation, and I even stepped back in time to the early days of Enterprise. But when Hollywood chatter turned to rebooting the saga from the start, placing new actors in the roles of …
review by . December 07, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
I was never a big Star Trek fan.  I had moments where I watched the original and where I watched Next Generation but for the most part I found the series to be well... boring.  Some of it was the science fiction stuff, others was because sometimes it seemed as though Star Trek could never get to the point.  That's not to say I hated Star Trek or couldn't stand it.  There were certain episodes of the original series that I rather enjoyed.  Some parts of …
review by . December 03, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
I’ll get the obvious out of the way immediately:  Were Star Trek (XI) a standalone piece of space-set science fiction entertainment, it would probably be one of the finest to come out off Hollywood in years.  The visuals are stunning, the acting top notch, the Michael Giacchino sound score flawless, and even JJ Abrams’ direction (which is often criticized for being jumpy and dependent upon effects) is quite appropriate.  So why then a very mediocre review score?  …
review by . May 25, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
movie poster
"…To BOLDLY go where No Man had Gone Before.".. …or something like that. The immortal tagline of the operatic TV franchise that had gone on for many generations. First off, let me tell you that I am a casual fan and more of a "Next Generation" kind'a guy, although my favorite Star Trek movie is still "The Wrath of Khan". After the failed box-office outings of recent ‘Star Trek" films ("Nemesis" for one) and the less than dominating …
review by . December 02, 2009
Quite Possibly the Best Home Video Release of All Time!
The Blu-ray for J.J. Abram's Star Trek is just plain cool!  There's really no other word to describe it.  What makes Trek on Blu-ray so cool?  Well obviously the movie itself and then the endless amount of awesome special features the second disc has to offer.  There are some people who don't really care for special features, but having watched them all, I can tell you that you're going to want to sit down and watch all of them!  While most DVD and Blu-ray releases come …
review by . September 10, 2010
I grew up with "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Since I didn't have cable, I rarely got the chance to watch the original Star Trek series. As I grew older, however, I got to watch TOS and found myself preferring it to TNG. It didn't matter how many new incarnations of Star Trek hit the television or the big screen, so long as no one messed with the original characters and the actors who portrayed them, I was fine. Then comes along J.J. Abrams. I have to admit that I followed the developments of …
About the reviewer
J.D. Walters ()
Ranked #851
Member Since: Apr 23, 2009
Last Login: Nov 12, 2012 02:15 AM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
heyzeus7
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
Recent reviews by heyzeus7
About this movie

Wiki


 Star Trek
tells the story of James T. Kirk, Spock and the rest of the Enterprise crew, following their time together at Starfleet Academy as well as their first mission together.

Cast:
  • Chris Pine as James T. Kirk
  • Zachery Quinto as Spock
  • Leonard Nimoy as Spock Prime
  • Bruce Greenwood as Captn. Christopher Pike
  • Karl Urban as Leonard "Bones" McCoy
  • Zoe Saldana as Uhura
  • Simon Pegg as Scotty
  • John Cho as Hikaru Sulu
  • Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov
  • Eric Bana as Nero
  • Ben Cross as Sarek
  • Winona Ryder as Amanda Grayson

J.J. Abrams Star Trek represents the first time in sixteen years since Leonard Nimoy has played the character of Spock.

Originally, Star Trek was slated for a Christmas 2008 release, but it was decided that the film would fair better as a summer blockbuster.  It would also allow for more media coverage as well as more time to work on the films visual effects.

This Film also represents the last time that Majel Barrett Roddenberry played the voice of the Enterprise Computer.  She died shortly after she had finished her work on the film.

J.J. Abrams' 2009 feature film was billed as "not your father'sStar Trek," but your father will probably love it anyway. And what's not to love? It has enough action, emotional impact, humor, and sheer fun for any moviegoer, and Trekkers will enjoy plenty of insider references and a cast that seems ideally suited to portray the characters we know they'll become later. Both a ...
view wiki

Details

Director: J.J. Abrams
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi
Release Date: May 8th 2009
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
DVD Release Date: Unknown
Runtime: 126 minutes
Studio: Paramount Pictures, Bad Robot
Polls with this movie
Avatar

21st Century Sci-Fi Movies

by

Star Trek Poster

Best Star Trek Movies

by

© 2013 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists