Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » Terminator Salvation » User review

Terminator Salvation (Director's Cut) (2009)

A movie directed by Joseph McGinty

< read all 13 reviews

This Franchise Should Be Terminated

  • Feb 27, 2011
Be forewarned - I didn't like it.

Why - we'll get to in a minute but first:

I don't hate all movies. I don't even hate all "modern" science fiction" movies.? But since I hated Charlies Angels, its probably safe to say that I do hate all MCG movies.

I like a good science fiction film. I'll even give props to SF films that aren't 100% good; in fact, considering some of the flicks I do like, my standards are pretty low. But not so low as to include this abomination.

I know its partly me: I'm stuck in an earlier era, one in which we were taught (both theoretically and by way of example on the big screen) that a good movie had - acting, plot, continuity, intelligible dialogue and, in the case of science fiction film - science that makes sense, technology that makes sense and reactions/plot points that reacted sensibly to both (come to think of it: why don't light sabers ever run out of power in the middle of a duel...)

Obviously it is my opinion that T:S had little to none of the aforementioned.

Low points: Christian Bale should have been wearing a mask and a cape; I wonder if anyone ever told him that he was acting in T4, not B3.

But perhaps I should back off a bit and hit things more globally before criticizing particular points.

One of the conceits that I always enjoyed about the previous T movies was the4 conceit that since we were playing with time travel, there was no reason to write a different plot for later incarnations. All you really have to do is take the various scenes from the first film (arrival, car chase, stumbling-injured-chase, seizure of police vehicles ("get out"), female lead comes into her own and such, mix them up, shove the new faces and new effects into them and viola - T2, T3.

By presenting the sequels in this fashion, it was possible to maintain the fiction throughout all three that they are all realities that were squeezed off into their own time-loop, doomed to repeat essentially the same sequence over and over, because out world avoided Judgment Day the moment that Kyle Reese and Sarah Connor conceived John.

(Somehow the whole time-travel paradox concept - understated as it was in the first film - has gotten lost, perhaps the filmmakers consider it too complex a concept for general audiences to understand but here it is in a nutshell: Reese travels to the past and conceives John Connor - the very person who would send him into the past to be conceived. John Connor, leader of the human resistance, only exists because there has been a Judgment Day - rendering the entire Terminator universe one parallel to our own, and one that only shares histories up to that conception point.)

Unlike Star Trek, in which the confusion between time travel and parallel universes muddles the entire plot, the set-up from the original Terminator film begins the franchise with the ability to play with alternate realities in any manner desired, since we're already in an alternate reality and have already introduced time travel and paradoxes, the plot is free to go wherever it wishes to.

So, instead of playing with the timelines, the BIG TWIST in T4 is: "hey - how about instead of people and machines traveling from the future to the past, we have a man/machine travel from the past into the future...?"

I'm beginning to think that we need Congress to enact a Science Fiction Film Law: anyone planning on producing a science fiction film must first submit their plot to a panel of science fiction writers, artists, futurists and editors (and a select group of successful SF film producers/directors, living or dead with success NOT measured by box office receipts) before the project can be financed.

I'm growing as bored of writing this review as I was while watching the film. I swear to god I almost fell asleep a couple of times. The so-called action sequences left me dizzy, with no real sense of who was fighting whom or what the outcome of the battle was; the camera shook too much, the perspective was way too close to the action and the cuts were MTV-quick style. I was honestly surprised that we didn't get flashed to a shot of a midget riding a tricycle, or 99 red balloons floating up to the sky.

I felt no sympathy for any of the characters; the future-retro look of Skynets machinery left me yawning and pissed off: the bikes and hydrobots were way too sophisticated when compared to the almost-steampunk-like giant terminators - but I totally lost it when, in a scene not too long after the young Kyle Reese explains that it's best to move around during the day because Skynet uses infrared, everyone is sitting around camp fires in the middle of the night.

Adding insult to injury - the executed felon turned terminator rips out his own control chip in order to defy his programming.

Nice to see Arnold in the cameo - he looked 25 years younger. They could have done the same for Shatner and Nimoy in Star Trek.

So far, the 2009 SF film season has been a major downer, box office receipts notwithstanding. If this is what we get from big budget, hyped up franchises, I say its time to go back to low-budget, no prior history, stories that rely on story, SF films.

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
More Terminator Salvation reviews
review by . May 23, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
movie poster
Hollywood has a habit of rebooting successful franchises, and it seems like the next one on the list is James Cameron's "Terminator" franchise. I have always wondered how the futuristic apocalyptic world of this sci-fi franchise would look like and as to how humans are able to survive and keep a "resistance". Having the rare distinction of being both a prequel and a sequel, "TERMINATOR SALVATION" attempts to give us that vision. The film pretty much takes off after …
Quick Tip by . July 12, 2010
i thaught that it was a good movie. full of suppence and action. i think the end was the best part.
Quick Tip by . July 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
This movie had more heart than the others in the series. The end is the best part to me.
Quick Tip by . July 10, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Unfortunately it was not the final terminator movies, but oddly enough it was almost a prequel to the others.
review by . December 21, 2009
I wouldn't hate this film as much if it didn't follow on the heels of two of the best films ever made. I'll admit that a couple of the early publicity photos piqued my interest, like this one...            ... which seemed to indicate some thought had gone into what Future War actually looks like. But then I reminded myself that this is directed by someone who calls himself "McG" (passport and drivers license, please) and whose string of directing …
review by . May 22, 2009
I'm really surprised to see how the Terminator franchise continually gets trashed by different directors. James Cameron's original premise sets up one of the greatest movie villains of all time against a hero with one of the biggest challenges of all time, and never lets go of its audience, creating a suspenseful sci-fi/horror story that's really second to none. Yet after the first two films, it's gone downhill from there.  Undoubtedly the special effects are the star of this film, with …
Quick Tip by . February 19, 2010
I thought everyone was killed at the end of Terminator 3. Oh well, I guess not. Good action w/ an actual plot. Go w/ me if you want to live.
review by . June 03, 2009
Terminator Salvation T888 poster
There are going to be a lot of purists for the original films who are not going to have a lot of good things to say about this film...including James Cameron.  As much as I am a "child of the times" and enjoy originals just the way they are, reboots are a great thing to re-ignite some dying franchises.  Part of what makes Terminator so great is all of its time paradoxes.  You can do anything with this great franchise, something that late Sarah Connor Chronicles proved.  What …
Quick Tip by . December 14, 2009
I generally enjoyed this movie. But I don't understand why the Terminators throw humans instead of smashing their heads. Poor programming?
review by . November 29, 2009
A good idea and set up gone sour by bad production values...
While T-3 nearly failed at giving a  good look at the near-end of Humanity by SKYNET It did succeed, barely, and that is saying something. McG's "Terminator Salvation"  delivers the beginning of the end of the war for  Earth  and the survival of mankind. But while this is what Terminator fans have been waiting for for almost twenty-five years  it falters on many levels and  almost falls flat on it's face when it needs to stand strong, but none the less  …
About the reviewer
Steve Davidson ()
Ranked #479
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


Terminator Salvationrestores some of the balance of huge freakin' explosions and emotionally compelling plot to theTerminatorseries. Set entirely after the nuclear assault that left the computer system Skynet in control of the world,Terminator Salvationfollows John Connor (Christian Bale) as he grapples with both murderous robots and his superiors in the resistance, who aren't sure they believe the prophecies that Connor is destined to save humanity. Into the midst of this struggle tumbles Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington, who would later star in James Cameron'sAvatar); the last thing he remembers was being executed in prison decades before. Baffled, he falls into company with Kyle Reese (Anton Yelchin,Star Trek) and a mute little girl, who soon get captured--but Wright then meets and bonds with Blair Williams (Moon Bloodgood,Eight Below), a resistance fighter who remains loyal to the confused Wright even though Connor suspects he's not what he seems--or what he believes himself to be.Terminator Salvationisn't the astonishing synthesis of action and feeling that eitherThe TerminatororT2were; the plot threads are poorly woven and fray completely in the last third of the movie. Despite this,Terminator Salvationhas at least two skillfully orchestrated action sequences that will get your heart racing, and Worthington’s beguiling mixture of toughness and vulnerability gives his relationship with Bloodgood a genuine pulse. It's imperfect, but compared ...
view wiki


Director: McG
DVD Release Date: December 1, 2009
Runtime: 117 minutes
Studio: Warner Home Video
First to Review
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since