Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » The Avengers (2012) » User review

'The Avengers' Directed By Joss Whedon

A movie Directed by Joss Whedon

< read all 23 reviews

The Avengers is gold entertainment that only suffers from being over-hyped...

  • May 5, 2012

"He who saves one life saves the world entire..."

Isn't it a bit awkward using one of the best one-liners in cinema history to start my review, especially for this movie? It probably is and you're probably wondering what was I smoking while writing this. Well, at the moment, nothing but terrible ideas for writing a review I guess. But to be honest, that quote serves a purpose because it tells a personal story. The Avengers may have not saved one life because hundreds of thousands of people lost their lives during these colossal action scenes that left New York in ruins but Joss Whedon saved my life after last night's screening. He saved my life because I was this close to die during this movie due to the boredom the first act of the film inflicted upon me. Thank God there are in each decent film these second and third acts that can revive us once in a while.

For me personally, The Avengers represents a clear example of why sometimes you should not judge something based only on appearance. Almost all the trailers and TV clips released during the marketing of this film left me with the idea that this movie will be a disaster dressed up in the stuffy clothes of a TV movie. My pessimism started to literally grind my insights.

The Avengers is based on a common story in which cliches keep their veracity and the denouement is a predictable one. The villain who threats our planet with massive destruction and total slavery, the rise of one or more superheroes against this evil, and this bulgy dialogue, all are ingredients of this film. All these though are to be expected when you have to deal with a movie in which you have a sea of characters that need to be nurtured and controlled. Joss Whedon's merit is not really in the story, even though it is not bad at all. There's this equipoise between all the dramatic and comedic moments and the explosive action sequences. Of course there are always exaggerations and arguments could be made regarding the limits that could have been passed at one point but all these happen during a pretty fast and stable narrative unrolling process. Nevertheless, we do have a minus here when the movie is split in two distinct parts that don't really complete one another. You have the first part in which we meet Loki (Tom Hiddleston) and we get to know his intentions, and we get to meet Nick Fury (Samuel L Jackson) and his plan to overcome this evil threat by bringing all the superheroes together under one big "guardianship" named The Avengers Initiative. This first part moves so campy and slow that it becomes irritating to follow. Happily, we have the second part of the film that rewards the audience with a set of explosive delights and facetious moments that will push you on the edge of your seat and will force you to taste this piece of entertainment. Whedon's magic though is not really represented within the story's theme or the story's central arc but within the almost perfect equilibrium he managed to set between all these diverse characters. There is this fluently and pleasant way of molding these heroes. This fair balance between the heroes' potential in fight showing each one of them getting their highlight on screen living few filler moments.

Of course, there are arguments here as well that could be made about Thor (Chris Hemsworth) being softly portrayed and not showing his true value or that Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) could have well made the movie as a simple waitress. Aside of that there was a really good execution of all these characters. Captain America (Chris Evans) as the on-field dedicated strategist, Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) as the smart heroic act or Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) as a stiff master of precision. The star of The Avengers is, as expected, Hulk (Mark Ruffalo) and not really his human alias Bruce Banner because I don't consider Ruffalo's performance that much big of a deal. Hulk had probably 80% of all the memorable scenes in this movie. It is a great mixture of animated series humor and a showcase of brute force. Speaking of acting, we have two good performances from Tom Hiddleston as the garrulous and childish Loki and Robert Downey Jr. as the flamboyant and quizzical Tony Stark. I want to add some things regarding Hiddleston's performance. Many dared to compare his performance with Heath Ledger's performance as The Joker. This seems to me to be a really outlandish and ridiculous statement. It's aberrant because the dynamic and the uniqueness of these performance are so different they're not even comparable. As for Hiddleston's strict performance, it's not his fault that the villain wasn't believable, that Loki never made you fear him or that he was too feminine in his behavior and gestures, both physical and figuratively. That's how this character is. He's childish and he acts like one. He likes show-off only when his superiority is clear. Tom did what he could with this character and he proved me he was a good choice for it.

There's also this one thing that scared me during the marketing of this movie and it really made me have low expectations for this: the visual style. I was afraid the quality of the cinematography will very much be TV-like, the texture would be too cartoonish or that the action scenes will have no sense of geography. Even though it isn't really the case, the movie could have looked so much better since there is this huge discrepancy between the great and the really grotesque technical traits. Technically it is a very unstable piece of filmmaking and the minuses can be overlooked only during the movie due to the explosiveness and diversity of the scenes. However, the visual effects are impressive, basically the best technical achievement. The huge disappointment comes from Alan Silvestri who's guilty for not providing this classic amalgam of heroes a great musical presentation. There's no feelings in the music, no emotion, no excitement. It's a piece of music that is brutal to me and it reminded me of the early 90s mediocre action films that had this chaotic and over the top score. Hopefully, the producers will consider taking someone else and go for something different, something really worthy of such a good Marvel displayment.

Overall, The Avengers is a good example of pure entertainment in which there's a good balance not only between the characters and their actions but also between all the dramatic and comedic scenes and the well-handled action scenes. Even though it's technically really unstable, the film compensates with a decent script, good performances, and memorable scenes which veils this movie in this exciting tumult. The Avengers only suffers from being too easily forgiven for all the flaws it has and for being really over-hyped and even overrated, especially when it comes down to the general aspects of filmmaking.

Storyline/Dialogue: 8.0
Acting: 7.5
Technical Execution: 7.6
Replay Value: 9.0
Overall: 7.7

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
May 11, 2012
Great stuff -seconded!
May 06, 2012
great stuff. I did like this movie and I was a little disappointed that I did not love it. Then again, there are just so many formula comic book adaptations out there now. thanks for the review!
More The Avengers (2012) reviews
review by . May 05, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Avengers Assemble! Joss Whedon Assembles Marvel's Mightiest Heroes!
With all the recent films that brought Marvel characters to life, almost every comic book fan was excited for the coming of an “Avengers” movie. I have read the “The Avengers” comic books ever since I was a very young child and even read them during this time of my adult life. I even managed to possess many of the issues that came before I was born. I guess you may say that I am an “Avengers” geek; I have seen the evolution of the team from something that leaned …
review by . May 05, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
It's been four years that Marvel has been planning and building to this.  If they failed, it would be hysterical.  Such a build up, such a hype with such a failure?  Oh yeah it would be epic.  Ever since Iron Man in 2008 have seeds and build up been planned.  All the movies that followed would have something to do with this film be it plot points, characters or even sly hints for fanboys to giggle at when they wink at them across the screen.      …
review by . May 04, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
The Avengers is pretty much a summer blockbuster through and through.  If there were a rule book for summer blockbusters, The Avengers would've written it.  Cheesy one liners?  Check.  Dumb plot?  Check.  Flat characters?  Sort of check (they're not that flat, but this is assuming you've seen their respective films).  Tons of stupid, mindless explosions?  Check.  Pointless strange deus ex machina that comes out of nowhere?  Check.  …
review by . May 12, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
*** out of ****    It would appear that Marvel's "The Avengers" has a little something for every movie-goer. The Joss Whedon fan, the comic book/Marvel geek, and the action movie aficionado can all safely rejoice under the comforting roof of a single film. It's been in development for quite some time, and perhaps teased and spoken of for even longer periods of time; but it's finally here, and it pretty much kicks ass. I guess I'll begin by saying that upon first glance, I didn't …
review by . May 09, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
'The Avengers' Is Spectacularly Good, But Not Great
What amazes me about the latest epic 'Marvel' Comics movie is how many things go right. With the ensemble of so many superheroes placed on one screen: [Captain America, (Evans); Black Widow, (Johansson); Iron Man, (Downey, Jr.); The Incredible Hulk, (Ruffalo); Thor, (Hemsworth); and The Archer, (Renner)]; the results could have easily been a cluttered mess. Instead, nearly all the necessary elements are properly placed. First of all, the menace of Thor's brother, Loki (Hiddleston), and …
review by . May 26, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
This is the best Marvel film since the first Iron Man film. Just like that film, the best part of this film was Robert Downey Jr. as the wise cracking Tony Stark. Loki has made a deal with an alien race that if he helps them get to Earth, they will conquer the planet and let Loki be the king (right). Loki must pave the way so they can get there and this involves stealing the Cosmic Cube (introduced in Captain America) and using to power a beam to open a passage through space.    To …
review by . May 15, 2012
Every bit as fun as you would expect.
From the day I walked out of that theatre after watching Captain America I was hyped, hyped for the Avengers. As much as I was hyped I got even more excited when I found out that Joss Whendon was directing.  Ever since I started watching Superhero movies I’ve been dying for a film featuring a crossover of different characters from different comic books. While the Avengers technically are their own comic book (Marvel vs. DC is what I had in mind) it’s still something I’m excited …
review by . April 29, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Something to Marvel at
Comic book movies or superhero movies or whatever you want to call them, all inherently have a very difficult task to accomplish. They all have to cater to a notoriously picky niche market, made up of detail oriented fanboys, while still remaining broad enough to appeal to the masses. They cost a fortune so they cannot afford not to attract the widest audience possible, but if they play it too broad, the fanatics will denounce the film and ruin any chance it has of making any money back. THE AVENGERS …
review by . May 03, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
        For those of you who are not in the know about The Avengers where have you been?  Seriously not only have there been two recent movies featuring The Hulk and Iron Man, but last year Paramount obviously rushed through production of Thor and Captain America to get the public ready for what could be a record breaking opening.  And while these two movies were nothing all that special, they both lay the ground work and have important …
review by . May 03, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Riding a massive wave of anticipation, hype, and phenomenal fanboy expectations, the mega-budget film version of Marvel Comics’ “The Avengers”, has arrived thanks to the vision of Director Joss Whedon (who also helped craft the story), and a $220 million plus budget. The film connects previous Marvel films such as “Thor”, “Captain America: The First Avenger”, “The Hulk”, and “Iron Man” and “Iron Man 2″, but can easily …
About the reviewer
Julian Left ()
Ranked #84
Member Since: Nov 4, 2010
Last Login: Mar 2, 2013 02:52 PM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


The Avengers is the title planned for an American superhero film yet to be produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Pictures. It was announced in April 2005 and is to be based upon the Marvel Comics superhero team of the same name. The film is intended to be part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe which crosses over several Marvel superhero films including Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, Thor and Captain America: The First Avenger. Chris Evans, Robert Downey, Jr., Chris Hemsworth and Mark Ruffalo are under contract to star, with Joss Whedon attached to direct a script written by Zak Penn and himself. The Avengers has an announced release date of May 4, 2012 in 3-D
view wiki


Director: Joss Whedon
Genre: Action, Adventure
Release Date: May 4 2012
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Joss Whedon
Studio: Walt Disney Pictures, Paramount Pictures, Marvel Studios
First to Review

"Something to Marvel at"
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since