Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012 film) » User review

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012 film)

The first part of Peter Jackson's three-part film adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's novel which is being shot in 3D.

< read all 8 reviews

So much internal conflict

  • Dec 26, 2012
  • by
Recently saw The Hobbit in 3D and walked away from it sadly conflicted. For one, I love Middle Earth and everything Tolkien. In fact, I love fantasy literature although I rarely dabble in it. Peter Jackson, who wonderfully adapted The Lord of the Rings series, falters with its prelude. My main issue with the movie was its length, which has never held me off of other Jackson-Tolkien films. The problem with The Hobbit is the tacked on bits, which do not appear in the book, are unnecessary and are not true to the nature of the book. While it's understandable for Jackson to want to recreate the grand, epic nature of  LOTR, The Hobbit doesn't need it. 

I can see the difficulty in pushing all of The Hobbit into one movie, but three movies? I'm assuming that much of the next two movies will deal with Sauron's back-story and to some extent, since this represents Jackson's last jaunt to Middle Earth, it makes sense. Still, it doesn't make for a very engaging first installment.

Things I loved about this movie:
Martin Freeman- fantastic casting all around but Freeman IS Bilbo Baggins; my one issue with the character has to do with the writing which gives Baggins a very shallow, and not quite in tune with the novel, nature
Thorin- who is kind of a jerk in the novel is fascinating in the movie, and undoubtedly, this is a solid choice by Jackson and one I can stand behind. Richard Armitage was captivating, sad, and weary. Beautiful.
The soundtrack- in my opinion, better than LOTR's (something I never imagined I'd ever say); listened to "Misty Mountains (Cold)" over and over and over once I got home
Gollum and Baggins Scene- hands down the best scene in the movie

Things I disliked about this movie:
The awkward and obligatory "bad guy"- Azog, completely unnecessary and added simply to create an arc for this installment. The Hobbit doesn't need this! Its strength lies within its innocence (which is a foil to LOTR and thus necessarily innocent) and simple storytelling.
Action sequences that just happen to the main characters
Saruman and the elves who are assholes for literally no reason (to be fair, they're meant to be this way)
That the movie ends and they still have MILES to go to reach The Lonely Mountain
So much internal conflict

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
October 31, 2013
More The Hobbit: An Unexpected Jour... reviews
review by . December 16, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Youthful and Lighter Than the Original Trilogy But Does Well as the First Movie in a New Trilogy
Peter Jackson’s “The Lord of the Rings trilogy” was ambitious, truly impressive in a technical sense and had a whopping over 9 hour combined runtime in movie theaters. Jackson found that the story even lacked several things that he made “platinum extended” editions of his trilogy that came to a near 12 hour runtime. Such an undertaking would have seemed audacious, but given the fact that the original material by J.R. R. Tolkien was a literary epic that had 1,200 pages, …
review by . December 21, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
In 2001, The Lord of the Rings kicked off what some say is the nerd takeover of Hollywood.  At that time the idea that you could turn J.R.R. Tolkein's books into films and have them be successful was pretty much a pipe dream.  Yet New Line Cinema bet on him anyway and it actually paid off.  The three films were incredibly successful, being some of the most influential of the decade and paving the way for more fantasy films to come.  Of course, there hasn't really been …
Quick Tip by . September 28, 2014
posted in Movie Hype
Clearly a money move. The Hobbit, by JRR Tolkien, was the book that was released before The Lord of the Rings trilogy and the book that set up Middle-Earth. The book is truly fantastic and worthy of a read. However, the reason the movie is a blatant gouge is because they're splitting the movie version into three parts, even though the book was nearly as long as any of The Lord of the Rings books. The movie is boring and contains a lot of complete bullshit scenes which are in there to pander to Rings …
review by . December 13, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey'...a 3D trip through Middle Earth at 48fps (Video)
They're back...the orcas, goblins, faires, dwarfs, dragons wizards and Mr. Hobbit, Bilboa Baggins (Martin Freeman) and a camero by Hobbit Frodo (Elijah Wood)      Shot in 48FPS, instead of the usual 24, as well as 3D, Peter Jackson has once again created a visually stunning, exciting, magical film that takes us on a journey through Middle Earth.      The film opens with an aged Frodo (Ian Holm) telling a story.  We are instantly transported to the …
review by . December 11, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Would somebody buy Peter Jackson Final Cut Pro? I am worried he doesn't have the readily accessible editing software that is the industry standard. That is the only rational explanation on how The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is being broken up into three different movies.       You may remember Jackson's last crack at the J.R.R. Tolkien books, The Lord of the Rings trilogy. The series was near-perfect, and while the last movie had eight different endings his hard …
Quick Tip by . May 30, 2011
The logo
To steal a phrase from another classic trilogy that was ruined by horrid prequels and the corporate greed of the director (which seems altogether appropriate), "I have a bad feeling about this."         So, here is my brief overview on The Hobbit film adaptation (including important events leading up to the conception of the film):      1937 - John Ronald Reuel Tolkien's mythopoeic children's novel The Hobbit is published to widespread …
About the reviewer

Ranked #1387
Member Since: Dec 26, 2012
Last Login: Jan 7, 2013 03:25 AM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


The Hobbit is an upcoming three-part film adaptation of the 1937 novel The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien and will serve as a prequel to The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. Peter Jackson, director of The Lord of the Rings film trilogy, is directing the film and also serves as producer and co-writer.

The film will star Martin Freeman, known for playing Tim Canterbury in the BBC comedy series The Office, as Bilbo Baggins and Richard Armitage, known for playing Lucas North in the BBC drama series Spooks, as Thorin Oakenshield. Several actors from Jackson's The Lord of the Rings film trilogy will reprise their roles, including Ian McKellen, Andy Serkis, Hugo Weaving, Cate Blanchett, Christopher Lee, Ian Holm, Elijah Wood, and Orlando Bloom. Additionally, composer Howard Shore, who wrote the score for The Lord of the Rings film trilogy, has confirmed his role in both parts of the film project.

The three parts, entitled The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug and The Hobbit: There And Back Again, are being filmed back to back and are currently in production in New Zealand; principal photography began on 21 March 2011. They will be released on December 14, 2012,  2013 and 2014, respectively.
view wiki
© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since