|
Movies •Books •Music •Food •Tv Shows •Technology •Politics •Video Games •Parenting •Fashion •Green Living •more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » The Three Musketeers » User review

The Three Musketeers
The Three Musketeers

A movie directed by Paul W.S. Anderson

< read all 2 reviews

I Don't Think Dumas Had Airships in Mind

  • Oct 22, 2011
Rating:
+3
Star Rating:


The Three Musketeers plays less like an adaptation of Alexandre Dumas’ original novel and more like a test drive for a new historical video game. Indeed, it was directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, whose career is in part defined by films based on video games (Mortal Kombat, Alien vs. Predator, the first and third Resident Evil films with another one on the way). It’s not the deviations that bother me; I truly could not care less how unfaithful a film is from its source so long as I’m being entertained. What bothers me is the simple-mindedness with which the story is told. This new The Three Musketeers – with its exaggerated stunt work, silly steampunk special effects, and awful twenty-first century dialogue – is an adequate film for fifteen-year-old gamers who have not seen any previous adaptation, never read the novel, and barely glanced at the CliffNotes.
 
The film has been shot and released in 3D. Perhaps it depends on the theater, but in my particular case, viewing it that way required a projection filter that dimmed the picture substantially, more so than for any film I’ve seen in 3D. The colors were faded and muddy. The bright scenes looked hazy, as if I was viewing them through a scrim. The dark scenes were just shy of unwatchable. On top of all that, the 3D is itself not all that immersive. If you see it in traditional 2D (and I strongly suggest you do), you may actually appreciate how good the film looks. The costumes are ornate, the sets are opulent, and although inappropriate from a narrative and historical standpoint, the computer graphics are detailed and convincing. If only an effort had been made with the screenplay and some of the casting choices; maybe then the film could have worked as escapist fun, irrespective of the fact that Dumas never conceived of cannon-blasting airships planned by Leonardo Da Vinci, secret passages that open with hidden switches, and concealed vaults booby trapped with darts.

                                               
                                                 
Aspects of the plot should be familiar by now. Taking place in the seventeenth century, we meet the Three Musketeers – Athos (Matthew Macfayden), Porthos (Ray Stevenson), and Aramis (Luke Evans) – a fighting company for the French monarchy. Once the pride of their country, their last mission was a failure, and they were forced to disband. Athos is drunk who, since being betrayed by his lover, doesn’t believe in anything anymore. Porthos is broke and is occasionally slipped some money by wealthy women. Aramis, a clergyman, remains a man of God but has separated himself from the Church. Into their lives enters a young peasant named D’Artagnan (Logan Lerman), who travels to Paris to become a Musketeer, like his father once was. Headstrong and quick-tempered, he isn’t chivalrous so much as cocky, challenging dangerous people to duels. Such a person is Captain Rochefort (Mads Mikkelson), who made the impertinent gesture of insulting D’Artagnan’s horse.
 
In due time, all four of them become embroiled in a case of international intrigue. It begins with the self-serving Milady de Winter (Milla Jovovich), who broke Athos’ heart by double crossing the Musketeers and selling the airship blueprints they stole from Venice to England’s Duke of Buckingham (Orlando Bloom). She’s now in league with Cardinal Richelieu (Christoph Waltz), who plots to manufacture a war between France and England and take control away from the sniveling, foppish King Louis XIII (Freddie Fox). This will involve stealing a necklace from Louis’ young wife, Queen Anne (Juno Temple). It’s up to the Musketeers and D’Artagnan to retrieve the necklace before France is plunged into chaos.

                                               
                                                 
It’s not so much an issue of plot, although a cannonball fight in the clouds is admittedly ridiculous, as is an impossibly elaborate swordfight on the rooftops and buttresses of Notre Dame Cathedral. It’s more a matter of dialogue and characterization, which were thoughtlessly handled. King Louis, with his overplayed eye for fashion and hilariously unconvincing attraction to his wife, is a desperately broad caricature that serves as nothing other than comedy relief. Milady could have been intriguing were it not for the miscasting of Jovovich; she’s not a bad actress, and she certainly looks sexy enough, but she lacks the sophistication (and the accent) necessary for this role. The Musketeers themselves are decent enough, but there’s something off about D’Artagnan, and again, I think it’s a matter of casting. Lerman, fresh-faced though he may be, brings no passion to the role. He comes off as impudent, reckless, and, despite some well-choreographed swordfights, not at all heroic.
 
During certain action scenes, Anderson relies on a technique that made his previous film, Resident Evil: Afterlife, very annoying. He has specific shots of stunt work play in slow motion, presumably in an effort to make them more dramatic – and, of course, to enhance the 3D process, since they’re often superimposed with images of flying objects, mostly swords. It’s a reasonable idea, but the way he handles it, it comes off as a gimmick. Also consider a shot in which Athos fires a cannonball; the camera follows up close it as it flies through the air; we can even see the fuse sparkling away. Does Anderson really want us to scrutinize these kinds of details? Or is he merely satisfying his desire for mindless action and special effects? Maybe I’m asking for too much, but I believe that even a dumbed-down, revisionist version of The Three Musketeers deserves more than that.

                                                    

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
6
Thought-Provoking
6
Fun to Read
6
Well-Organized
6
Post a Comment
October 23, 2011
I saw scenes and previews of this at Wondercon with a discussion with the stars and director. They have their heart in the right place, but I agree -- the fancy martial arts-style fighting would never have been seen in 17th century France! Good review.
October 23, 2011
Thanks for the comment. In all honesty, I wouldn't have minded the fanciful story enhancements if the casting had been better and the writers had made more of an effort with dialogue. Oh, what bad dialogue this movie has.
 
October 22, 2011
Anderson always knew how to make popcorn action scene and I love Milla....still on the fence on this one since I heard it was intended for 3D (to enhance the experience) and I really don't want to shell out the extra $$. I mean, I know Anderson would never execute a intricately coherent plot. I'll see if I have time, but I'd rather see 50/50....
October 23, 2011
I need to see 50/50 myself (so many films I missed in the hospital). You should definitely save your money and see The Three Musketeers in 2D. I'm just repeating myself here, but the 3D projection I saw was unbelievably dim. If you're going to see it, you deserve a bright picture.
 
1
More The Three Musketeers reviews
Quick Tip by . November 24, 2012
posted in Movie Hype
Caption
I finally got a chance to see this on bluray the other night. I have to admit that while it wasn't a terrible movie, it sure wasn't good either. If you've seen "The Musketeer", the core plot feels very familiar albeit minus the airships.      The film behaved liked a video game and may have influences from Japanese anime with the way the fights, the devices and elements were introduced. The story had horrible plot holes and while the special …
see all The Three Musketeers reviews (2)
About the reviewer
Chris Pandolfi ()
Ranked #7
Growing up a shy kid in a quiet suburb of Los Angeles, Chris Pandolfi knows all about the imagination. Pretend games were always the most fun for him, especially on the school playground; he and his … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Chris_Pandolfi
Your ratings:
National Treasure: Book of Secrets
National Treasure: Book o …
Bigger, Stronger, Faster* (2008)
Bigger, Stronger, Faster* …
Dying Breed
Dying Breed (2008 movie)
Dinner for Schmucks
Dinner for Schmucks
rate more to improve this
Recent reviews by Chris_Pandolfi
Argo
A Fake Movie, a Real Rescue Mission
a review of Argo
War of the Buttons
Pergaud's Turf War Gets the WWII Treatment
a review of War of the Buttons
Atlas Shrugged: Part II
Rand to Her Readers: "You're on Your Own"
a review of Atlas Shrugged: Part II
see more reviews
About this movie

Wiki

Add wiki

Tags

Movies
see all

Details

Director: Paul W.S. Anderson
Genre: Action, Adventure, Romance
Release Date: 21 October 2011 (USA)
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Andrew Davies, Alex Litvak
see all (7)
First to Review

"I Don't Think Dumas Had Airships in Mind"
© 2013 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists