|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » The Wages of Fear » User review

Wages of Fear: More suspenseful than a first date

  • Jun 8, 2012
  • by
Rating:
+5



Imagine going to see a movie with someone on what might be a first date. The uncertainty about whether this is anything more than two new friends getting together is compounded by not knowing much about the person you're with. Is she a saint? Is he a psycho? The movie would have to be compelling to divert your attention from those concerns.

The almost-flawless Wages of Fear could do that. The movie (aka Le Salaire de la Peur; 1953; in French with English subtitles; directed by Henri-Georges Clouzot; starring Yves Montand and Charles Vanel; Best Film at the Cannes Film Festival, where Vanel was named Best Actor) is so gripping that you could easily forget you're with someone, even if you're in a crowded theatre. The film's suspense rivets so completely that you could even forget there are other people in the world besides you and those on the screen.

Director Henri-George Clouzot, who also directed the original Diabolique (Les Diaboliques, 1955), paces his extended opening slowly so that the audience has time to get to know the central characters. Then Clouzot exploits our familiarity by plunging them into a series of extreme dangers, which he presents with mastery that transfers much of the characters' intense anxiety to us. The experience is so enthralling and exhausting that the movie's end brings with it some surprise that it was just a movie. Part thrill ride, part nightmare and part masterpiece, Wages of Fear seems so much more.

The movie follows four men stuck in a remote Latin American village who are desperate to earn a little money. They drive trucks loaded with volatile nitroglycerine across terrain that is bumpy in its best spots and seemingly impassable in the rest. The oil company that hires them needs the nitro to blow up a well that is consumed by fire, but the company's pressing need doesn't make it generous. The men risk their lives for a relative pittance.

The audience goes through every bit of their ordeals with them. We hold our breath every time the road jostles their trucks. We breathe when things calm down, but stop breathing again when a new danger threatens. The movie's power can leave viewers frozen. It does not make sense, but you might find yourself afraid to move in case something you do triggers an explosion.

Wages of Fear grips strongly because of the richly drawn characters and the complex relationships among them. One is a thug, but his early dominance gives way to something almost touching. Another looks Aryan, which makes his presence in post-World War II Latin America suspicious, but those suspicions turn out to be off the mark, at least in part. These vague references are intended to suggest some of the skillful nuance with which the characters are presented.

Yves Montand's assured and virile performance made him a star. Charles Vanel and Peter van Cyck invest their portrayals with impressive shading and energy. Folco Lulli brings to his performance as the fourth driver much more than the simple comic relief into which his character could have slipped.

If there is a weak performance, it reflects more on the script than on the actor involved. Vera Clouzot has the thankless task of being unyielding in her devotion to Montand's character despite his dismissive mistreatment of her. He treats her so badly that anyone who knows that Vera was married to director George-Henri Clouzot could be tempted to wonder if their off-screen relationship was a happy one. Vera Clouzot comes across much better in her husband's Diabolique, in which she plays a villain.

There is one mistake in Wages of Fear that is difficult to overlook. The ending has one of the main characters behaving in a way that betrays all that has come before. It completely contradicts everything we have seen him do and have heard him say. Evidently we are intended to accept that he acts recklessly in defiance of the extreme caution that was demanded of him, but it goes beyond that into absurdity. Because there is no way to reconcile his final actions with his earlier ones, it is best to forget the ending entirely.

Or skip it. If you stop watching when someone falls to the ground with an inferno in the near background, you'll end the movie with an image so striking and ambiguous that it reflects deftly all the subtlety and power that has preceded it. Otherwise, you end up with a final 60 seconds or so that mar what is in all other respects a masterpiece.
Wages of Fear: More suspenseful than a first date Wages of Fear: More suspenseful than a first date Wages of Fear: More suspenseful than a first date

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
3
Thought-Provoking
3
Fun to Read
3
Well-Organized
3
Post a Comment
June 09, 2012
This sounds interesting. I do tend to like classic movies and TV shows, I just have this issue about needing to be in the right mood to watch them. However, hook me up with a Twilight Zone marathon and I'm a happy camper. Great review, and thanks for the recommendation! :)
 
1
More The Wages of Fear reviews
review by . March 14, 2011
Nerve-wracking and magnificent, and the anti-American oil stuff now just seems quaint
The Wages of Fear is a magnificent thriller, the last hour-and-a-half of which will have you chewing your nails up to your wrists.        Las Piedras is a tiny South American town that reeks of poverty and bakes in the steaming sun. You can smell the squalor. Children with sores, tired donkeys and mangy dogs fill the dirt streets. It's the final stop for down-and-outers whose only hope is to find work with the Southern Oil Company (you can infer SOC easily is a …
review by . July 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
What Pompted You to write a Review?   This is a film where I could see the French Existential philosophy in action.     How was the Plot, Acting, Direction?      The plot of this film was about truckers hauling very explosive nitroglycerin through the South American jungle to a mining camp.  This was very dangerous work as just one bump could lead to the tanker truck exploding. However, instead of writing this as a suspense drama, this film was …
Quick Tip by . July 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
One of the best examples of the French existentialist movement in movies.
About the reviewer

Ranked #187
Member Since: Mar 17, 2012
Last Login: Jun 22, 2012 03:59 AM UTC
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
peterww
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

Remade by William Friedkin as "The Sorcerer".

Several scenes were cut for the US releases.  The deleted scenes were accused of being "anti-American".

The first film to win the Golden Palm (Cannes Film Festival) and The Golden Bear (Berlin Film Festival).
view wiki

Details

Genre: Action, Drama, Adventure
Release Date: April 22, 1953
MPAA Rating: Unrated
Screen Writer: Henri-Georges Clouzot
Runtime: 148 minutes
Studio: CICC
First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists