|
Movies Books Music Food Tv Shows Technology Politics Video Games Parenting Fashion Green Living more >

Lunch » Tags » Movies » Reviews » X-Men: The Last Stand » User review

X-Men: The Last Stand

Director Brett Ratner's 2006 film that marks the end of the first "X-Men" film trilogy.

< read all 13 reviews

Disappointing

  • Oct 9, 2006
Rating:
-2
My husband and I love the first two installments of X-Men. We were in a Stuff Mart over the weekend, and I suggested buying X-Men 3. My husband asked "Are you *sure*?" I replied "Well, we loved the first two installments. With Jean Grey returing as The Phoenix, it should be great!"

We watched it last night and were stunned. We were both silent--in shock--at the end of the movie.

SPOILER ALERT: Phoenix--resurrected Jean Grey--ends up killing Cyclops during a romantic tryst. You see, we weren't told something important in the first two installments: Xavier had to "split" Jean into two personalities to protect her from her own gifts. The purely instinctual, uncontrolled, subconscious part of her was "The Phoenix". The conscious, controlled, intellectual part was the Jean we knew from the first two movies.

If that isn't bad, she ends up disintegrating Xavier. Yes, the beloved Doctor and leader of the School for Gifted Youngsters goes out with a whimper.

Magneto takes this uncontrollable creature under his wings (?!). She mostly stands by looking blank (I think she was supposed to look menacing) until the final confrontation. After some of the mutants are neutralized with "the cure" (a serum derived from a mutant that reverses mutations) or destroyed--THEN Phoenix suddenly goes into action, disintegrating people and objects.

Wolverine says he's the only one that can stop her, because of his regenerative skills. Jean comes to her senses for a few seconds, and begs Wolverine to save her. Of course, he has to kill her to do so.

Storm--a lackluster Hallie Barry--ends up taking over the school and delivering a ho-hum eulogy.

There's so much wrong with this movie that I don't know where to start. I'll just mention a few:

1. Brett Ratner stinks as a director

2. Special effects, no matter how cool, are never a substitute for a strong plot and strong dialogue (unless you're just a mindless consumer of action flicks)

3. Magneto, played by Ian McKellan, wears his helmet almost the entire second half of the movie. If you recall, he wore this helmet to stop the thoughts of Xavier from infiltrating and influencing his mind. Why, then, did Magneto continue to wear his helmet after Xavier was annihilated?

4. If Xavier was going to die, he deserved a better send off than having his protege having a cosmic tantrum and destroying him

5. Why is Logan/Wolverine smiling up at the sky, school campus awash in sunshine and colorful flowers, when he's lost his father figure and had to kill the woman he loves--in effect losing her TWICE?

6. Bobby (Ice Boy) begins to get cozy with the Girl Who Can Walk Through Walls. There is little interaction between he and Rogue (poor Anna Paquin hardly gets any air time!)--and Rogue knows Bobby is cozy with the other chick. Yet, she takes the cure to rid her of her mutant powers so she can touch/kiss Bobby? Maybe--but GEEZ. Weren't enough mutants already killed or neutralized?!

So we have Mystique neutralized (she's a mere human), as is Magneto and Rogue. Xavier is dead, as is Jean Grey and Cyclops. Storm is in charge of the school, Wolverine is hunky dory with the way everything has turned out, and the mutants and humans are now united--living happily ever after.

For crying out loud!!

The only good thing about this movie was the special effects and some cool mutants like "Tin Man" (can't remember his real name), the blue fur guy, Juggernaut (very cool!), Angel Boy (also cool) and a kid who sprouts spikes.

However, that's not enough to save this movie. We were so disgusted that I'm going to list this movie on Amazon for sale right after I write this review. (We didn't even want to explore the extras or alternative endings!)

What a waste of EXCELLENT acting talent. (That is, Ian McKellan, Patrick Stewart, Hugh Jackman, and Anna Paquin.)

Whoever agreed to hand this debacle over to Brett Ratner should be excommunicated from Hollywood--as should Ratner himself and whoever wrote this lacklaster script.

What a way to sink an incredible, exciting movie franchise!

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
0
Thought-Provoking
0
Fun to Read
0
Well-Organized
0
Post a Comment
More X-Men: The Last Stand reviews
review by . May 02, 2011
one spoiler      I actually don't mind this film, contrary to the majority of the moviegoing population. Yes, there are a lot of things wrong with it, but so sue me, this is a guilty pleasure of mine. This was actually my introduction to the X-Men, and now I love the two first films better, but like I have a soft spot for Scream 3, I have a soft spot for X-Men 3. There are cons, but the movie is just entertaining enough to warrant a 60. However, the change in directors is …
review by . May 20, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
I've been pleased with the X-Men series overall, and X-Men United is a fitting end to the trilogy. The plot is a bit far-fetched - Jean Grey being an all-powerful super mutant - but it does up the ante (including one memorable death scene). My only complaint is that I wish it had been longer - it seems as if the film is rushed in only 100 minutes. Otherwise, if you liked the first two, you'll love this one.
Quick Tip by . August 05, 2010
Short changes it's characters in a bad way and introduces some we don't care about but does take the "mutant civil rights" issue onto the screen in a way that makes sense to be the analogy of real world issues that X Men is supposed to be.
review by . May 20, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
I've been pleased with the X-Men series overall, and X-Men United is a fitting end to the trilogy. The plot is a bit far-fetched - Jean Grey being an all-powerful super mutant - but it does up the ante (including one memorable death scene). My only complaint is that I wish it had been longer - it seems as if the film is rushed in only 100 minutes. Otherwise, if you liked the first two, you'll love this one.
review by . April 29, 2009
I have seen all the movies that have been put out by Marvel over the last 6 years or so and was never a big fan of the X-Men films though the first 2 were passable. This movie has way too many characters in it! Some of the characters are pathetic looking such as the Juggernaut and The Beast (who looks and sounds like they dyed a gorilla costume from the Planet of the Apes movies). They waited to the last installment to introduce The Beast and the Angel who were original X-Men in the comics (X-Men …
review by . September 07, 2007
This would be a good movie IF it were not called X-Men. They have completely sabotaged the X-Men storyline from the comics. They came up with new stories, which is sometimes ok, but not here. Jean Grey is barely used, Storm looks weak and undecisive, and Scott, why did they even have him there? THe movie left too many things unexplained, changed the X-men Universe and forgot to give some depth to the characters. This is just an action film and only that. Only Wolverine saves the day and the movie. …
review by . December 31, 2006
posted in Movie Hype
'X-men,' I thought reading reviews, would be like a high-tech sci-fi "Calvin Ball". That is I thought the evolution of the movie's rules and causality would change by whim. Instead, we get a "rock/ paper/ scissors" approach. Each superhero has their own connecting powers, like one has fire and another has ice. In this installment, the mutants find there is a cure for their powers, which some make into a crusade, others a curse. There is a societal divide; one that breaks out with signs and protestors, …
review by . December 27, 2006
I have seen all the movies that have been put out by Marvel over the last 6 years or so and was never a big fan of the X-Men films though the first 2 were passable. This movie has way too many characters in it! Some of the characters are pathetic looking such as the Juggernaut and The Beast (who looks and sounds like they dyed a gorilla costume from the Planet of the Apes movies). They waited to the last installment to introduce The Beast and the Angel who were original X-Men in the comics (X-Men …
review by . October 24, 2006
X-Men, The Last Stand is not a perfect movie, but it is better than the reviews led me to think it would be. The issue here is that a "cure" has been found for the mutations, but many of the mutants do not feel they need to be cured. Good things about the movie included some terrific interaction between Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan and a superb performance by Famke Jannsen, who had been underutilized in the previous films. Hugh Jackman and Halle Berry turn in their usual good performances. There …
review by . October 04, 2006
Never a fan of the comic book hero outings, this viewer watched X-MEN - THE LAST STAND with a bit of mental prejudice: action heroes capable of destroying everything in sight at the glance of a weird eye or the motion of a hand have just never seemed entertaining. But given that stance, watching this very colorful film was an art study in how far computer generated graphics have come in a relatively short time. And that makes the time spent on the non-story worthwhile.    Of …
About the reviewer
Janet Boyer ()
Ranked #214
Author of The Back in Time Tarot BookandTarot in Reverse. Co-creator of theSnowlandDeck. Amazon.com Hall ofFame/ VineReviewer; Freelance Writer/Reviewer; Blogger; Professional Tarot Reader/Teacher; Lover … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
JanetBoyer
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

X-Men: The Last Stand is the third installment in the popular superhero franchise, and it's an exciting one with a splash of fresh new characters. When a scientist named Warren Worthington II announces a "cure" for mutant powers, it raises an interesting philosophical question: is mutant power a disease that needs a cure, or is it a benefit thathomo superiorenjoys over "normal" human beings? No surprise that Magneto (Ian McKellen) and his Brotherhood of Evil Mutants resist the idea that they need to be cured, and declare war on the human race. But it's a little tougher for the X-Men, led by Professor X (Patrick Stewart), Cyclops (James Marsden), and Storm (Halle Berry). If you're Rogue (Anna Paquin), for example, your power means you can't even touch your boyfriend, Iceman (Shawn Ashmore). To compound matters, someone previously thought dead has returned, and might be either friend or foe.

With director Bryan Singer having moved on to Superman Returns, the franchise passes to the hands of Brett Ratner (Rush Hour), whose best work is done in the big action sequences such as a showdown between mutant armies. But it's difficult to manage the sheer volume of characters when adding longtime comic-book stalwarts such as Beast (Kelsey Grammer) and Angel (Ben Foster), and one character in particular deserved better than an off-screen dismissal. And fans of the original Dark Phoenix comic book story might be underwhelmed by...

view wiki
Polls with this movie
DVD front

Best Movies Based on Marvel Comics

by

DVD front

Comic book flicks

by

Australia poster

Hugh Jackman Movies

by

© 2013 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists