For the underappreciated screen treasures you love
Avatar

James Cameron's epic sci-fi fantasy film released in 2009.

< read all 117 reviews

Nothing hurts more then a script swung by a heavy hand.

  • Feb 2, 2010
Rating:
+1
You take 12 years and what do you get?  James Cameron has given us a glossy and pretty looking movie that no matter how much sparkle is in the images, no matter how cool the visuals is nothing more a gussied up expy for the United State's involvement overseas and war in the Middle East.  Just watching the TRAILER for this told me the lowdown but I didn't feel justified in my passing judgement without seeing it, and lo and behold sometimes you really can judge a book by it's cover because you certainly can judge a ship by it's hull.

Heres the story:  Earth has landed on the aptly named Planet Pandora (a box that once you open releases nothing but problems) a beautiful world that is littered with Unobtanium (oil) that a greedy and thick headed corporation wants because Earth (US) has a weak economy and the military will use force to get it if the locals inhabitants (Arabs) seen as savages refuse to relocate so that the Unobtanium can be obtained.  Corporate weasels are in charge and talk thinly about how the inhabitants have been taught the english language and other Earth customs (Do I need to spell that out to ANYONE?) in an attempt to communicate they're intentions better.  A final measure brings in a crippled Marine to inhabit the body of a cloned alien via a computer so that he may interact better with the locals and go undercover.  His first mission out doesn't go smoothly and he becomes involved with a tribe of the locals and taught their ways.  While the Military sees this as an Anthroplogical goldmine, they don't see that the Marine is slowly slipping away from his roots and becomming one with the people.  Kinda like Dian Fossey from Gorilla's in the Mist which had Sigourney Weaver- and HEY there she is, playing a scientist who doesn't like her work perverted in the way that it is for the dummys in charge.  Refreshing.

I'm coming down on this movie cause it doesn't take half a brain to see what the movie is REALLY about and if it sounded like I was spoon feeding you, well thats what the movie is doing.  It's telling you, your too stupid to figure out the greater picture in either the movie or the real world so we'll dress it up for you.

Characters aren't even all that interesting or are type cast.  Stiff and gruff Sarge, dimwit corporate schill who only cares about money, the strict scientist, warrior girl, hell Wes Studi is the voice of the lead alien warrior.  Kinda like Last of the Mohicans, right?

So why not a lower score?  Simple, the movie LOOKS AMAZING!  Yes I am rating a movie that is Fern Gully, Dances with Wolves and current world events (read recycled) on a basis of the incredible visuals.  It looks great even in a regular movie theater.  I haven't seen it in IMAX or in 3D but even a regular theater looks spectacular.  I heard that this new 3D process is being a new format that Cameron is championing along with George Lucas for new film making techniques.  Something tells me that much like Lucas, Cameron took his eye off the ball and made sure the film looked phenominal with the story secondary.  That brings me to the next piece.

Why not a HIGHER score?  Even simpler, because this is JAMES CAMERON we're talking about.  The guy who has given us some of the most classic action movies, helped pioneer visual effects (and is doing that here) AND was able to write some subtle messages into his past movies with Aliens having one about corporate greed and Terminator 2 as an anti nuke/nuclear war warning isn't doing anything with his story this time that we haven't either seen before or said subtler elsewhere.  Really I came out of the movie saying: 
OKAY CAMERON, THE US DOESN'T BELONG IN THE MIDDLE EAST!!!  I GET IT!!!! 
WE ARE THE ALIENS TRESPASSING, GOT THAT TOO!!!!

Movies in the past have taken real world problems into space before to better analyse issues and to take a better look at them, hell my favorite Star Trek movie, The Undiscovered Country was an analog for the collapse of the cold war but THAT movie, at least didn't talk down to me and let me figure things out for myself.  Avatar looks wonderful but anyone with even the slightest grasp of sociology can make heads and tails of Avatar and it's message.


SERIOUSLY...unobtanium?!   Should just be called, "no oil for you."
Nothing hurts more then a script swung by a heavy hand.

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
16
Thought-Provoking
16
Fun to Read
17
Well-Organized
15
Post a Comment
November 17, 2010
Wonderful title, great review. I was thinking Pocahontas and Fern Gully while watching this.
November 18, 2010
Heres a piece of irony. For the anti America message I came away from with this movie, it sure didn't bother Cameron much to have just re-released this to make MORE money, the American way some could argue.
 
February 05, 2010
Haha, it should just be called "no oil for you!" I completely agree, although I think you give Cameron too much credit with this script. I don't think he was trying to give us a relatively timely message about the US in the Middle East, I think he is trying to give us a hippie-dippy "Hey, man, the US, like, shouldn't interfere with, like, other people, man!" I think he wants to cover every sin Western culture has committed from Columbus forward, and I see as much Manifest Destiny, Vietnam, French & Indian War, Spanish-American War, Korea and Panama as I do Iraq, which to me makes it even worse, he can't pick an analogy so lazily slaps a bunch of crises together. To me the only way it could have been worse would be if Cameron came on screen at the end to go over the bullet points and repeatedly say "Do you get? Huh, do you get it? This is important stuff!" This film is as subtle as a brick to the face; nothing ruins art more than pretentious posturing.
February 05, 2010
Yeah, I'd hate to say that my appreciation for Cameron went down with this movie but it did. 15 years ago he made True Lies where the US fights evil terrorists, now it almost feels he's inverted the characters. What a difference time makes. In all honesty even though he's on the bloodthirsty side, I LIKED Miles, the General in the movie and I hear people who don't like the movie side more with him. Looks like I'm not alone.
 
February 02, 2010
Nice review on the opposite side of the spectrum. Many of the points you brought up I had consider already, but I still enjoyed the movie. :)
February 02, 2010
I could have enjoyed it more if it wasn't so blatant in it's message and delivery. Thank you.
February 02, 2010
Yeah, but I think the general public isn't as smart as you or I (to be perfectly honest and hopefully not too rude/mean sounding). I have this theory about the intelligence of a mass/mob. If you don't spell things out plain and simple, they will never get the point.
 
February 02, 2010
In spite of its political undertones, I actually still enjoyed this a lot more.  I mean, it's pretty obvious and all... although if I had to be honest... Cameron was NEVER much of a gifted writer or one for originality, for that matter.  He had Terminator that was different and that was really about it on the whole.  But I still admired the action the visual effects and the fact that he at least didn't have much of anything to screw up.  But I didn't feel like it was preaching to me.  Even with the political undertones it at least didn't do what Family Guy does and just look at you and say, "You're an idiot if you think differently than I do!"
February 02, 2010
Thats how I practically summed up Family Guy when I wrote about it. It looked great but this movie would be better used as a launch pad for the new 3D filmmaking then a good story. A preachy movie isn't quite as bad as a pretentious one but it's still bad but in a different way.
 
1
More Avatar (2009 film) reviews
review by . March 09, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
test
   I was waiting to write this review for a while because I had only seen it in 3D. I was utterly amazed because it was the first 3D movie I had ever seen. I wanted to go straight home and write a review giving it a +5 rating. Upon talking with others who had seen the movie and reading various criticisms and analyzes of the film, I began to doubt my initial reaction. Was I letting the CGI effects and the 3D elements hype the movie to a level it didn't deserve? So, I was determined …
review by . February 23, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
James Cameron, it seems to me, creates wonderful dishware in which to place the most nourishing and satisfying of those things we humans crave. All those J. Cameron-imprinted tureens and goblets took rare imagination and meticulous craftsmanship to make. Just one piece can cost a Wall Street banker's annual bonus. They boggle. But look inside that tureen and there ain't no vichyssoise. Take Avatar.       This is one of the most beautiful movies you'll ever hope …
review by . January 30, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Fly me to the moon
              It’s when Adventure meets Art,  you’ve got the human spirit all throughout this film. The good, the bad.   Learning is a way of life. Innocence is inherent. Trust in the invisible and the unknown. The spirit within each living thing. Every day is an adventure. Entertainment at its summit!   A Dreamland. A Wonderful World. A Stunning Visual. An Incredible Imagination. A World beyond words …
review by . March 01, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Great Ride & Groundbreaking Movie!
Well, here goes nothing.  I've not really done movie reviews before, and honestly am intimidated to a degree by the major film buffs who are incredibly adept at breaking down plots, themes, and drawing parallels to other films.  This is simply my totally novice, average schmo-ette attempt to share my thoughts ... so please be kind : )      My main take-aways: This will be the Star Wars for my young daughter's generation. I wanted to BECOME one of …
review by . November 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
*** out of ****   James Cameron knows how to build hype. He also knows how to spend money very well. “Avatar” is the result of how Cameron spends his time and money, being a technical masterpiece but none the less a terribly familiar trip. Sure, it’s very engaging. Sure, it looks pretty. But when watching it, I noticed that everything Cameron shows or does is something that has been done before. Some of his choices often result in “Avatar” being very predictable …
review by . February 21, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Thats Right I Didn't like this movie
Avatar is your basic outsider/broken dude finds himself in a place he dosent belong/fit in. And after being there a while he finds himself and he's a new man. Avatar felt like a play it safe movie to me. It was predictable and we've literally seen movies like this a thousand times. The 3-D in my opinion didnt really add anything to the film. So after all that why am I giving this movie a 3 and a half? Because Avatar is one of the most awe-inspiring movies Ive seen in a long time. I loved …
review by . December 29, 2009
Avatar: relegates Lord of the Rings to 'old hat'
 I bow to our friend, who prefaced his astonished and profound appreciation of the Avatar movie with "It drives me nuts.." (that they have to include the dominator thing.....) "But...."      The conversation that ensued resulted in all 8 of us (4 couples) going to IMax for the experience (that one couple's second viewing). We came out of there with 'sea legs' and we're still re-orienting.      It's significant in my little Universe …
review by . December 21, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
4 ½ + Stars: Absorbing Fantasy Adventure and Thought-Povoking Themes Make This a Blockbuster!
             Let’s get one thing out of the way, James Cameron’s “AVATAR” is the most expensive film ever made; with a staggering budget of $ 230 million (there’s a rumor that they ended up spending $ 260 mil), expectations for the film is very high. Cameron had impressed me with “Aliens”, “The Abyss”, Terminator and T2: Judgment Day” but I decided to keep my expectations low. He won …
review by . December 18, 2009
The Greatest Science Fiction Epic of All Time!
James Cameron has outdone himself!  He may have actually outdone the whole entire film industry.  Never in my life have I seen a film so brilliant and beautiful that it made me rethink the whole way in which I look at film.  Avatar is what movies are all about; transporting you into the film and making you feel as if you're really there.  Mr. Cameron has accomplished that with they way in which he has revolutionized the 3D genre of filmmaking.  Avatar isn't just another …
review by . December 18, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
It's been years since James Cameron released a film.  The last movie we got from James Cameron was the mega-huge blockbuster Titanic way back in 1997.  When you make the biggest grossing film ever, you normally have to follow that up with something big.  For James Cameron it's Avatar.  An idea he's been tinkering with for over a decade (since before he even released Titanic, in fact).  This is the time when Cameron's film could finally be done.  When he first got the …
About the reviewer
John Nelson ()
Born in Wausau Wisconsin. Move at an early age to Ventura California and lived for 8 years. Growing up in a big city landscape didn't prepare me for my next move: Archbold Ohio with a population of … more
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
TheJohn
Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki

Avatar is a 2009 American science fiction epic film written and directed by James Cameron and starring Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Michelle Rodriguez and Stephen Lang. The film is set in the year 2154, when humans are mining a precious mineral called unobtanium on Pandora, a lush moon of a gas giant in the Alpha Centauri star system. The expansion of the mining colony threatens the continued existence of a local tribe of Na'vi—a sentient humanoid species indigenous to Pandora. The film's title refers to the genetically engineered Na'vi and human hybrid bodies used by several human characters to interact with the natives of Pandora.


Development on Avatar began in 1994, when Cameron wrote an 80-page scriptment for the film. Filming was supposed to take place after the completion of Cameron's 1997 film Titanic, for a planned release in 1999, but according to Cameron, the necessary technology was not yet available to achieve his vision of the film. Work on the language for the film's extraterrestrial beings began in summer 2005, and Cameron began developing the screenplay and fictional universe in early 2006.

Avatar was officially budgeted at US$237 million. Other estimates put the cost between $280 million and $310 million for production, and at $150 million for promotion. The film was released for traditional two-dimensional projectors, as well as in 3-D, using the RealD 3D, Dolby 3D, XpanD 3D and IMAX 3D formats, and also in ...

view wiki

Details

Director: James Cameron
Genre: Action, Adventure, Drama, Fantasy, Sci-Fi
Release Date: December 18, 2009
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: James Cameron
Runtime: 162 minutes
Studio: 20th Century Fox
First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Screen Gems is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists