For the underappreciated screen treasures you love

While not lacking entertainment, Iron Man 2 fails to be what Iron Man was

  • Mar 31, 2011
Rating:
-1
The United States government is now demanding of Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) that he hand over his advanced armor technology to the military. Stark publically refuses in a fashion that gets him a lot of negative attention. Though one day Stark is attacked by a man named Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke) who has technology of his own that might be on its way to being able to defeat Stark. Vanko now possibly has the technology to make a suit even stronger, and more advanced than Stark's. Meanwhile, Stark's body is being poisoned, and he is slowly dying. So Nicky Fury, (Samuel L. Jackson) member of SHIELD, tries to offer help to Stark, revealing new technology that can save Stark's life. And Stark must team up with Lt. Col. James 'Rhodey' Rhodes (Don Cheadle) to defeat their new, and powerful enemies.


To be honest, Iron Man 2 just did not work for me. I know right off I will receive a lot of negative comments and votes for this review, but I really did not care for this film that much. To start with, I did not like the first film near as much as everyone else did, I thought it was a really good film, but all of the 100 and 90 ratings were too high for me. But what Iron Man had that Iron Man 2 didn't was a decent story. The story in Iron Man 2 fails to keep a consistent tone. At one point Stark is battling Ivan Vanko and trying to keep his technology, and another involves a whole different story about the "Avengers Initiative". I admit this was not a very big part of the story, but I thought Iron Man 2 really lost itself in that time, which really hurt the film in my book.


Also, I honestly felt as if I was watching a comedy. Iron Man perfectly mixed humor and action, all while still keeping the film dramatic when it needed to be. Iron man 2 does not at all do this. The character of Tony Stark in this one was really annoying at times, and it just didn't work for me. The party scene where Robert Downey Jr. and Don Cheadle face off was just plain stupid in my opinion. I did find the film funny at times but, by the climax when the audience is supposed to be at the edge of their seat wondering what will happen, I honestly just didn't care. It was way too predictable, the ending was obvious the whole time, and there was absolutely nothing at all for the audience to worry about. Which realy just did not sit well with me, this film may have worked for some, but it just did not live up to the first for me.


However, I did give the film as high as a 50 for a reason. There were definitely good parts to it. For one, the acting was almost as good as it was in the first. Robert Downey Jr. is as funny as ever, and still, even though I had problems with a character, did a very good job with his performance. He really plays the part of a funny, not very serious action hero very well. But my biggest issue with the cast was Don Cheadle taking the place of Terrence Howard. Don Cheadle may be a talented actor, but I don't really care for him. On other hand I do enjoy Terrence Howard, and thought he did a much better job playing Lt. Col. James 'Rhodey' Rhodes. Even though Cheadle's performance was good, I really preferred Howard in this one. I respect Mickey Rourke as an actor, and he was funny at times, but I cannot say too much about his acting here, especially after Jeff Bridges played the bad guy in the first film. And of course I never have any complaints for Samuel L. Jackson, even if he wasn't in the film very much.


Iron Man 2 also had fantastic visual effects going for it. I am not usually one for explosions and mindless action in films, but at least I can say they made it look good. It was nominated for an Oscar here, and it really was well deserving. All of the action sequences involving the suit are very well done, so that really made the film more enjoyable for me.


Overall, Iron Man 2 has its good points, and has its bad points. Unfortunately, the bad points were extremely hard for me to get over them, and it really hurt the film in my eyes. The series may be known for its over the top characters, mainly in that of Tony Stark, but in Iron Man 2 I think it was just too much for me. There is obviously good points, in the acting and the effects. I don't have a lot to criticise for the actors, most everyone did a good job here, and the visual effects were top notch. But in the end this film may work for a lot of people, but for me it just didn't.



  

What did you think of this review?

Helpful
6
Thought-Provoking
6
Fun to Read
6
Well-Organized
6
Post a Comment
May 07, 2011
Yeah the first one was much better, great review.
 
March 31, 2011
Excellent review! I somewhat tolerated this movie the first time I saw it, it had some good points as you've said, but I dunno, it just didn't sit well with me and felt too Hollywood-ish to me. I liked the first movie, but honestly while it was a good start for shellhead, I have major problems to its characterization. Hey, this one had Scarlet LOL! Thanks for posting this review to our community! I hope you saw the newsletter...
March 31, 2011
Thanks! Good to see someone else noticed some of the same things I did :) and yeah, I saw it!
 
1
More Iron Man 2 reviews
review by . February 11, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
*** out of ****     The sequel to Jon Favreau's near-perfect "Iron Man" turns out to be pretty darn good, mostly thanks to the directorial talents of Mr. Favreau himself. Since it's nigh impossible to make a sequel to "Iron Man" and make it nearly as impressive and refreshing as the original film, Favreau decides to use what he's got. And he presents "Iron Man 2", in all its star-studded, CGI-happy glory, in the most passionate way possible. If you've heard that "Iron Man 2" …
review by . May 07, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
3 ½ + Stars: Shellhead Gets a
   …well, not exactly, although “Iron Man 2” is definitely your Hollywood fare that relies on being loud, “spiffy”, brisk popcorn entertainment but it does do it well; its uninspired plot mechanics render this sequel a step backward. The first film (personally that was NOT the Tony Stark I remember) while not perfect had better plot development and didn’t rely on being “spiffy” too much but focused more on characterization. …
review by . May 09, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Superhero movies have a strange formula to them that, for the most part, has served it well for the past decade.  The first movie spends quite a bit of time on the origin of the hero and thus it's usually not quite as interesting as the first sequel.  Once we get to the first sequel we've passed the "how" someone became a hero and usually the "why," so the bigger focus is usually on a nemesis to the hero and perhaps digging a little deeper into the hero's own story, …
review by . May 09, 2010
Lacking in Iron
IRON MAN 2 Written by Justin Theroux Directed by Jon Favreau Starring Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Dona Cheadle, Scarlett Johansson, Sam Rockwell and Mickey Rourke      Ivan Vanko: If you could make God bleed, people would cease to believe in him.      When the lights went down at the sold out opening night screening of IRON MAN 2 that I attended, there was a particular energy in the air.  It was that moment when you realize that what you’ve …
review by . May 07, 2010
Would
Forgive the parlance, but I can't think of a better name for an irresponsible man who gets loaded, straps on a suit of destructive armor and starts using his laser beams to trick shoot fruit and vases in a crowded room full of people.  Tony may have seen the error of his ways in the first movie but with those troubles behind him theres plenty of room for his fast lifestyle and inner jerk to come out in this one.      Iron Man 2 is THE most anticipated Summer movie of …
review by . May 15, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Iron Man 2 takes off at a thounsand miles per hour and doesn't slow down.....
When "Iron Man" was released  in the early summer of 2008 it took the box-office and critics for a ride they would soon never forget, its huge critical and commercial success  and Robert Downey Jr.'s natural charm and appeal as the hero Tony Stark  landed this  larger than life comic book adaptation amongst the ranks  of greats such as Tim Burton's "Batman" and "Batman Returns", Christopher Nolan's "Batman reboot "Batman …
review by . May 12, 2010
posted in Movie Hype
Sequels have a tendency to be on the mixed reaction of results. In the case of Marvel films (Spider-Man, X-Men, Fantastic 4, Hulk), it's a hit or miss. Regardless, we still love those comic book heroes in their adaptations. As with all comic book adaptations, they all loosely follow the comics per panel.      Iron Man 2 continues the origin story of Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) as he continues to rise and protect the world from evil in his armor powered suit. Now that he has …
review by . August 15, 2011
posted in Movie Hype
Plenty of action. Plenty of drama, partying, flirting. But it lacked the heart of the first film (pardon the pun) and felt more choppy and predictable. There was one very satisfying relational moment, but other than that, I felt pretty indifferent and glad I didn’t hand over the moulah to see it in the theater. I’d suggest trying before buying.     
review by . May 07, 2010
If the turnout tonight is any indication of how popular Iron Man is this movie is in no danger of flopping. Iron Man was a comic book I picked up to try to get into something long ago as a kid. I wasn't completely familiar with the whole story, but that's what these movies are really designed to do. Initiate the public into the fantastic and interesting worlds of the comic books.      Most everyone already knows what this movie will entail from the previews. Mickey Rourke? Check. …
review by . May 13, 2010
Not as bad as you think.
      Your right its not as good as the first, but it aint that bad.          I think most people didnt like Ironman 2 beacause this movie although called Ironman focused mainly on Tony Stark. The stress from the US Government, the stress of being Ironman and running Stark Industries, and lets not forget The Arc reactor in his chest is killing him. But even through all this we still got a bunch of action and lots of laughs. Ironman 2 was a great …
About the reviewer
Matt Stewart ()
Basically all anyone would need to know about me is I love movies. I watch movies, review them, and I can always enjoy a good, long talk about the art of film making.
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

You
Moviesfan
Your ratings:
9 DVD
9
rate more to improve this
About this movie

Wiki



Iron Man 2 is a 2010 American superhero film based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name from Marvel Studios and Paramount Pictures. It is the sequel to 2008's Iron Man, and the second film in a planned trilogy.  Directed by Jon Favreau, the film stars Robert Downey Jr., reprising his role as Tony Stark.

Tony Stark has revealed his identity as Iron Man and is resisting calls by the United States Government to hand over the technology. Ivan Vanko has also duplicated the technology and built weapons of his own, creating new challenges for Stark.

The film held its red carpet premiere in Los Angeles, California, on April 26, 2010 and in France on April 28, 2010. It was released in the United States on May 7, 2010.





After the high-flying adventures of the firstIron Manpicture, the billionaire arms manufacturer and irrepressible bon vivant Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) finds himself nursing a hangover. But not like any hangover he's had before: this one is toxic, a potentially deadly condition resulting from heavy metals (or something) bleeding out of the hardware he's installed in the middle of his chest. This is the problem Stark needs to solve inIron Man 2, not to mention the threat from resentful Russian science whiz Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke), whose father helped create the Iron Man technology. There's an even bigger problem for the film: the need to set up a future Marvel Comics movie universe in which a variety of veteran ...
view wiki

Details

Director: Jon Favreau
Genre: Action, Adventure
Release Date: May 7th, 2010
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Studio: Marvel Studios, Paramount Pictures
First to Review
© 2014 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Screen Gems is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
()
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since
reviews
comments
ratings
questions
compliments
lists