Where No Website Has Gone Before
Where No Website Has Gone Before
A lunch.com community for the world of Star Trek
Star Trek Poster

J.J. Abrams reboot/prequel to the "Star Trek" film franchise.

< read all 39 reviews

The Franchise Lives on With this (somewhat) Strong Undertaking (Spoilers)

  • May 10, 2009
  • by
Pros: Stellar special effects; okay plot-line

Cons: Some plot holes, of course; not enough character development.

The Bottom Line: The movie is a fun, exhilarating, fresh body of entertainment

The Star Trek franchise has been alive for over forty-five years and through all of the various incarnations: Star Trek The Next Generation, Star Trek Deep Space Nice, Star Trek Voyager, Star Trek: Enterprise, as well as nine motion pictures, I have been an eager and loyal fan.    

But the new century has not been as kind to the world dreamed up by the late Gene Roddenberry.  The latest Star Trek spin-off, Star Trek: Enterprise only lasted a short while before being canceled due to low ratings in 2005 and Paramount needed to jumpstart concept lest it fade from American popular culture.  Enter Star Trek directed by adrenaline junky JJ Abrams and staring a cast of (virtual) young unknowns.         

The Story-Line

This Star Trek the movie once again explores the oft-misunderstood and frequently filmed world of time travel.  The movie explores the birth of the legend that will become James T. Kirk in the Star Trek universe.   The baddies are once again the Romulans, or in this case one Romulan in particular, named Nero portrayed by Eric Bana (Troy, Munich, The Other Boleyn Girl).  Nero, who captains an advanced mining ship, is out to avenge the destruction of his home world Romulus some 129 years in the future.  The Spock of the future portrayed by Leonard Nimoy, promised to stop said destruction by a super nova by using a substance called red matter, but he was too late, the planet was destroyed and Nero blames Spock.        

Meanwhile, a 25-year old James T. Kirk is convinced-rather easily if you ask me-to join Star Fleet by Captain Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood - St. Elsewhere, Knots Landing, John from Cincinnati) who knew his father before he perished at the hands of Nero.   Spock the younger (Zackary Quinto - 24, Heroes) also joins Star Fleet and the two along with Dr. McCoy, Scotty, Sulu, Checkov and a lovely Lt. Uhura (Zoe Saldana (Six Degrees) are all trusted together onboard the Federations newest flagship, the U.S.S. Enterprise N.C.C. 1701 on a mission to save the Federation.   

My Thoughts
There is not much to dislike in the re-boot of the classic series.  The movie is well acted with stellar special effects and a credible enough plot-line.  There were of course liberties taken with the story, but the look and feel of Star Trek is as authentic as one is liable to expect.  For instance the depiction of the Enterprise's engine room as one filled with machinery large and small, and pipes snaking hither and yon, would put a smile on any sailor's lips, especially those referred to a snipes (engine room personnel). 

Screen writer's Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman penned a genuinely (mostly) smart script. Woven throughout Star Trek are little nuggets of the past designed to draw in old fans like myself, yet appeal to a whole new generation of viewers. 

Both Orci and Kurtzman seem to know the classic series well enough to find the right tonal blend of drama, humor, and mockery. They know what to poke fun at, what to have fun with and what to pay reverence to.  So as each classic character-now young and vibrant-is introduced they deliver something fresh as well as something familiar to the viewer drawing all audiences.

There were notable holes in the script, however, like how a ship designed for mining in deep space is able to find off whole fleets of warships, Federation and Klingon and live to destroy whole planets. I did not like the cloak of invincibility ala the Borg.  Nor did I find it particularly believable that the Vulcan's would have proved unworthy of the task of protecting themselves.  Please!       

Abrams for his part, as he is wont to do, as is his trademark, keeps the action moving swiftly.  Star Trek packs more action and effects onto the screen than any previous endeavors.   But, this is where the move falls short of the mark.  So concerned is Abrams with moving at a oft-break-neck pace, and introducing all the familiar elements that there is scarce time for a real (human) story that conveyed any of the thoughtful ideas that creator Gene Roddenberry made such an integral part of the original series.

While many consider Roddenberry's Star Trek an allegory for the myriad of problems plaguing 1960's America: racism, Vietnam, the Cold War, social unrest, and even environmental concerns, Abram's Star Trek is no allegory; it's an action movie complete with fist fights, blood, and lots and lots of loud explosions.  It would not be a stretch to state that Abrams Star Trek lacks the soul of the original, so in its own way it mirrors the contemporary society in which it was born.  Gone are the noble aspirations of "exploring new worlds and civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before," this is survival baby, this is war!  

No doubt if this were the first iteration of the (Star Trek) story on film it would not enjos the cult following of its 1960's namesake, but as a new edition to the existing well-established franchise, it is a fun, exhilarating, and fresh body of entertainment.


Movie Mood: Action Movie
Viewing Method: Studio Screening/Premiere
Film Completeness: A few glitches, but mostly complete.
Worst Part of this Film: Nothing

What did you think of this review?

Fun to Read
Post a Comment
More Star Trek (2009) reviews
review by . March 23, 2013
What was your first impression? Very negative        Plot summary? A new cast of the characters having the same name is introduced with a new storyline. Kirk and Spock forge a friendship under fire.        What's the bottom line?      There are some bad moments that will turn off many long-term Star Trek fans but if that happens, watch it a few more times and concentrate on the relationships between the main characters. 
review by . December 12, 2010
Let's just be clear, I am not a trekkie nor have I ever been a trekkie, and this film did not make me a trekkie, but that didn't stop me from enjoying this reboot of the franchise. The acting was great, the special effects were great, the story was great, and I recently found out that this was the only Star Trek film to win an Oscar (best makeup). It did tend to drag/ be too talky and sometimes hard to follow in some scenes, but for the most part, the movie worked.      …
review by . May 03, 2009
Star Trek Poster
Just as a warning, this review is going to be very spoilerific, so if you hate spoilers don't read this, but I just can't help myself. Now then, may I just say that this might be the BEST Star Trek Film ever?! And that's not comparing it to The Wrath of Khan or First Contact. This Trek film stand alone among all of the other ones. When J.J. Abrams set off to make a Trek film that was accessible to both non-fans and fans, he apparently knew just what he was doing. This film was also an ensemble piece. …
review by . February 27, 2011
posted in SF Signal
How is it that a film that has been so anticipated, has had so much money and hype devoted to it ends up on the screen with a continuity error in the first half-hour? I refer to the scene in which McCoy is sneaking Kirk onto the shuttle to the Enterprise: Kirk enters the shuttle wearing a red cadet's uniform and then appears on the Enterprise wearing a black uniform. I won't even go into McCoy's breaking the 'do no harm' mantra of the medical profession... Yes, I'm probably …
review by . August 26, 2010
To be honest, I didn't think it could be done. I'm one of those old-time fans. I grew up on episodes of Star Trek in syndication. I cheered the return of the original cast to the movies. I followed closely -- at times more with a sense of loyalty than enthusiasm -- the various series set within the Next Generation, and I even stepped back in time to the early days of Enterprise. But when Hollywood chatter turned to rebooting the saga from the start, placing new actors in the roles of …
review by . December 07, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
I was never a big Star Trek fan.  I had moments where I watched the original and where I watched Next Generation but for the most part I found the series to be well... boring.  Some of it was the science fiction stuff, others was because sometimes it seemed as though Star Trek could never get to the point.  That's not to say I hated Star Trek or couldn't stand it.  There were certain episodes of the original series that I rather enjoyed.  Some parts of …
review by . May 25, 2009
posted in Movie Hype
movie poster
"…To BOLDLY go where No Man had Gone Before.".. …or something like that. The immortal tagline of the operatic TV franchise that had gone on for many generations. First off, let me tell you that I am a casual fan and more of a "Next Generation" kind'a guy, although my favorite Star Trek movie is still "The Wrath of Khan". After the failed box-office outings of recent ‘Star Trek" films ("Nemesis" for one) and the less than dominating …
review by . September 10, 2010
I grew up with "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Since I didn't have cable, I rarely got the chance to watch the original Star Trek series. As I grew older, however, I got to watch TOS and found myself preferring it to TNG. It didn't matter how many new incarnations of Star Trek hit the television or the big screen, so long as no one messed with the original characters and the actors who portrayed them, I was fine. Then comes along J.J. Abrams. I have to admit that I followed the developments of …
review by . May 07, 2009
Honestly speaking, Star Trek is something I had never gotten into, though that slightly changed when an online friend of mine kept posting episode commentaries on the original TV series she was rewatching..     Of course, when I saw the trailer for the new movie in the cinemas, and seeing how amazing Zachary Quinto looked as Spock(I personally love Quinto), I knew it was a movie I had to see. The fact that J.J. Abrams was directing was a bonus.     After watching …
review by . December 01, 2009
Star Trek
It's 2233, and the USS Kelvin is researching a space anomaly. George Kirk (Chris Hemsworth) is left in charge of the ship when Nero (Eric Bana) orders Captain Richard Robau (Faran Tahir) to board his ship. When Robau tells Nero the star date, Nero kills Robau and attacks the USS Kelvin. When Kirk realizes that he cannot save the ship, he orders an evacuation or everyone else. His pregnant wife Winona (Jennifer Morrison) begins to give birth, and asks Kirk what he wants to name his son. Kirk decides …
About the reviewer
Vincent Martin ()
I am an IT Professional and have worked in the industry for over 20 years. I may be a computer geek, but I also like reading, writing, cooking, music, current events and regretfully, politics.
Consider the Source

Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.

Your ratings:
rate more to improve this
About this movie


 Star Trek
tells the story of James T. Kirk, Spock and the rest of the Enterprise crew, following their time together at Starfleet Academy as well as their first mission together.

  • Chris Pine as James T. Kirk
  • Zachery Quinto as Spock
  • Leonard Nimoy as Spock Prime
  • Bruce Greenwood as Captn. Christopher Pike
  • Karl Urban as Leonard "Bones" McCoy
  • Zoe Saldana as Uhura
  • Simon Pegg as Scotty
  • John Cho as Hikaru Sulu
  • Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov
  • Eric Bana as Nero
  • Ben Cross as Sarek
  • Winona Ryder as Amanda Grayson

J.J. Abrams Star Trek represents the first time in sixteen years since Leonard Nimoy has played the character of Spock.

Originally, Star Trek was slated for a Christmas 2008 release, but it was decided that the film would fair better as a summer blockbuster.  It would also allow for more media coverage as well as more time to work on the films visual effects.

This Film also represents the last time that Majel Barrett Roddenberry played the voice of the Enterprise Computer.  She died shortly after she had finished her work on the film.

J.J. Abrams' 2009 feature film was billed as "not your father'sStar Trek," but your father will probably love it anyway. And what's not to love? It has enough action, emotional impact, humor, and sheer fun for any moviegoer, and Trekkers will enjoy plenty of insider references and a cast that seems ideally suited to portray the characters we know they'll become later. Both a ...
view wiki


Director: J.J. Abrams
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi
Release Date: May 8th 2009
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Screen Writer: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
DVD Release Date: Unknown
Runtime: 126 minutes
Studio: Paramount Pictures, Bad Robot
Polls with this movie
Star Trek Poster

Best Star Trek Movies


© 2015 Lunch.com, LLC All Rights Reserved
Lunch.com - Relevant reviews by real people.
Where No Website Has Gone Before is part of the Lunch.com Network - Get this on your site
This is you!
Ranked #
Last login
Member since