The following movie is a "girl falls for vampire" love flick. It consists of some action, and few scenes, particularly with leaping and superspeed running, that was almost had me laughing with how ridiculous it looked on screen, however I did enjoy it, for what it is.
I never read the book, but after seeing this movie, I immediately decided to buy the series via amazon to read during my leisure. It was not so much the fact that the story, in general, was that amazing. However, consistently throughout the movie, it seemed to hint at a much more complete character setup for each of the characters. The movie only teased us with all of these deep, meaningful characters and ideas, yet many of these characters only seemed to have a couple lines in the movie, which just did not fit the depth that the movie suggested these characters had. Had the movie been lord of the rings long, it might have had more time to fill in the gaps I am missing from the character development. However, these teasers are enough to encourage me to want to read the books to determine more about the characters and to continue the storyline where it leaves off.
Overall, the movie was a bit cheesy, and while its "romanticism" might be enough for teenage girls, there were many points in it where I had to roll my eyes and go "oh geese". The story felt incomplete, which leaves me wondering how much was left out from the book that would add to the intriguing story. I felt some of the special effects were not done well, and seemed almost comical when placed on screen in the manner that they were. I also felt that in the beginning, the sense of time was really off. It was very hard to tell when days, weeks, or months have gone by in the movie at any given part. The movie did manage to get you to really like the collin family, and care about the characters and their development. I think this was done well, particularly the baseball scene.
So a decent movie, if you are willing to forgive that it has a lot of depth it simply can't place into a movie from a book without making it impossibly long. If you are someone who can't forgive that fact, then this movie may seem confusing to you if haven't read the book, or a disappointment if you have.
Twilight is another movie I had no intention of seeing but watched it anyway and actually ended up absorbed in the story. Not in love, not necessarily recommending it, but absorbed. I've not read the books. Not that I don't want to, I do. But I've been told that I'll need to set aside time because once I start I won't want to stop. I've seen a few vampire movies. As far as Twilight in the vampire department...the gore is minimal as is the horror. Its there, bubbling under … more
Director Catherine Hardwicke ("Thirteen," "Lords of Dogtown (Unrated Extended Cut)," and "The Nativity Story") has a special affinity with the subject of most of her films; she captures the inner angst of the adolescent from seemingly a personal vantage point that puts each member of her audience right smack in the cauldron of raging hormones, inferiority complexes and the necessity of rebellion that makes up the teen universe no matter what the generation. In her 2008 film "Twilight" she departs … more
I loved this movie. Most of the time I am disappointed when a movie is based on a book. Most movies can't live up to a books standards. That's my personal opinion. I was very pleased with the Twilight movie. I still think that the book was better but the movie was awesome. Bella moves to the small town of Forks to live with her father. On her first day at school she sees Edward. Edward is mysteriously sexy and Bella feels drawn to him. But Edward has a secret. He's a vampire.
Bella Swan can only hope that her boyfriend can keep from draining her of her blood. That might sound a bit goofy, but in Bella's "Twilight" world, it's just another day. "Twilight" is based on the enormously popular book series by Stephenie Meyer. It is a book series which I have yet to read, so I will only offer my review of the film as is and not against the book. In the film, Bella (Kristen Stewart) has just moved to little Forks, WA, to be with … more
I like writing reviews and hearing people's opinions. I am a biologist at a local college in Milwaukee. I have a wife. I have 1 son who is currently two and another son who recently passed away from … more
Consider the Source
Use Trust Points to see how much you can rely on this review.
The big-screen adaptation ofTwilight, Stephenie Meyer's bestselling vampire romance, is aimed squarely at its key demographic: teen girls whose idea of Prince Charming is a brooding, pale, undead teen who could kill you instantly at any moment. Such a prince is more fascinating than frightening to new girl Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart), who moves to the rainy-gray town of Forks, Wash., to live with her dad (Billy Burke), the local sheriff who's puzzled by a series of "animal attacks." On her first day at school, Bella appears to (visibly) nauseate her lab partner, Edward (Robert Pattinson). Turns out the scent of her blood is this vampire's "brand of heroin," and his struggle not to kill her causes an irresistible pull toward her. Whether he's attracted for the normal reasons or because she smells especially sweet to him is vague in the book and even less clear on-screen; nonetheless, Bella falls hopelessly in love with Edward, which sets her on a dangerous path when a few nomad vampires show up in town, one particularly keen on tracking the human. Directed by Catherine Hardwicke (Thirteen),Twilightis full of funny moments--not all of which are intentional--and the casting, from Stewart to Bella's self-absorbed friend Jessica (Anna Kendrick) is spot-on. The weakest link, unfortunately, is Pattinson. While he certainly looks the part, his Edward could have used an extra injection of testosterone (Pattinson, who is British, used James Dean as a model for his American accent). In...